Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, November 18, 1986U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - 707 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 6-10 sur 64
Page 140
... Region I Director and the Chief of the Natural and Technological Hazardous Division that no such pressure took place . I do , however , wish to emphasize two important points relative to this issue . The first is that it is absolutely ...
... Region I Director and the Chief of the Natural and Technological Hazardous Division that no such pressure took place . I do , however , wish to emphasize two important points relative to this issue . The first is that it is absolutely ...
Page 146
... Region I personnel to ensure that the process was going forward in an expeditious and unbiased fashion . 6. The question of whether FEMA should proceed with the exercise of an emergency plan involving two States where one State was ...
... Region I personnel to ensure that the process was going forward in an expeditious and unbiased fashion . 6. The question of whether FEMA should proceed with the exercise of an emergency plan involving two States where one State was ...
Page 147
... Region I. 8. FEMA did conduct an exercise of the emergency plans submitted by the State of New Hampshire on February 26 , 1986 . I declare , under penalty of perjury , that the foregoing is true and correct . Executed on the 19 day of ...
... Region I. 8. FEMA did conduct an exercise of the emergency plans submitted by the State of New Hampshire on February 26 , 1986 . I declare , under penalty of perjury , that the foregoing is true and correct . Executed on the 19 day of ...
Page 149
... region's energy needs . I also believe that any source of future energy must be safe . I do not believe that we can guarantee the safety of our citizens if Seabrook is licensed to operate . Therefore , I am opposed to the licensing of ...
... region's energy needs . I also believe that any source of future energy must be safe . I do not believe that we can guarantee the safety of our citizens if Seabrook is licensed to operate . Therefore , I am opposed to the licensing of ...
Page 151
... region will suffer tremendous consequences unless Seabrook operates , let me say that a strong viable New England economy is dependent upon a reliable diverse energy supply deliv- ered at the lowest possible cost . Seabrook does not ...
... region will suffer tremendous consequences unless Seabrook operates , let me say that a strong viable New England economy is dependent upon a reliable diverse energy supply deliv- ered at the lowest possible cost . Seabrook does not ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
adequate Amesbury applicant assessment ATKINS beach Board of Selectmen Chairman Chernobyl Chernobyl accident Civil Defense communities concerning Conservation and Power containment decision Derrickson Dignan Director discuss documents emergency evacuation Emergency Planning Sensitivity emergency planning zone emergency preparedness emergency response plans Energy Conservation evacuation plan event exercise facility failure FEMA Governor Dukakis Hampshire Yankee health and safety hearing letter Licensing Board low-power testing MARKEY Massachusetts meeting Memo memorandum November 18 NRC staff NRC's nuclear plant nuclear power plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office offsite emergency operating participation planning and preparedness probabilistic risk assessment procedures protective action PSNH public health Public Service questions radiation radioactive Radiological Emergency Response reactor regarding regulations release Representative request RERP risk Seabrook nuclear power Seabrook plant Seabrook Station Shoreham source term SSPSA Update Stratham Subcommittee on Energy submitted Sununu technical Three Mile Island town utility VOLLMER Washington WINGO
Fréquemment cités
Page 221 - States that : (a) The development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security.
Page 221 - SECTION 1. DECLARATION. — Atomic energy is capable of application for peaceful as well as military purposes. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that— "a. the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security ; and "b.
Page 24 - TMI, we must not assume that an accident of this or greater seriousness cannot happen again, even if the changes we recommend are made. Therefore, in addition to doing everything to prevent such accidents, we must be fully prepared to minimize the potential impact of such an accident on public health and safety, should one occur in the future.
Page 152 - ... d. a program to encourage widespread participation in the development and utilization of atomic energy for peaceful purposes to the maximum extent consistent with the common defense and security and with the health and safety of the public; e.
Page 276 - The NRC will base its finding on a review of the FEMA findings and determinations as to whether State and local emergency plans are adequate and capable of being implemented, and on the NRC assessment as to whether the licensee's emergency plans are adequate and capable of being implemented.
Page 185 - the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.
Page 24 - Is that, given the present level of safety being achieved by the operating nuclear power plants In this country, we can expect to see a core meltdown accident within the next 20 years and it Is possible that such an accident could result in off-site releases of radiation which are as large as, or larger than, the releases estimated to have occurred at Chernobyl.
Page 147 - Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0396 (EPA 520/1-78-016), December 1978.
Page 474 - ... of the sum of prompt fatality risks resulting from other accidents to which members of the US population are generally exposed.
Page 285 - ... presumes that offslte Individuals may become contaminated with radioactive material or may be exposed to dangerous levels of radiation or perhaps both. Planning for emergencies 1s required as a prudent risk reduction measure for these Individuals. Since a range of accidents with widely differing offslte consequences can be postulated, the regulation does not depend on the assumption that a particular type of accident may or will occur. In fact, no specific accident sequences should be specified...