Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, November 18, 1986U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - 707 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 6-10 sur 100
Page 76
... Federal law and Federal regulations , and that is to deter- mine the adequacy of emergency plans for the Massachusetts com- munities near Seabrook . Let me state at the outset something that should be obvious : Emergency plans do not ...
... Federal law and Federal regulations , and that is to deter- mine the adequacy of emergency plans for the Massachusetts com- munities near Seabrook . Let me state at the outset something that should be obvious : Emergency plans do not ...
Page 77
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can occur within 30 minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that radiation can reach a radius of 5 miles within 2 hours . Massachusetts ...
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can occur within 30 minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that radiation can reach a radius of 5 miles within 2 hours . Massachusetts ...
Page 83
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can take place thirty minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that the radiation can reach out to a radius of five miles within two hours ...
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can take place thirty minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that the radiation can reach out to a radius of five miles within two hours ...
Page 85
... Federal regulations mean what they say , that emergency plans must be " adequate to protect the public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency . " We have looked hard at emergency planning for Seabrook . We do not ...
... Federal regulations mean what they say , that emergency plans must be " adequate to protect the public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency . " We have looked hard at emergency planning for Seabrook . We do not ...
Page 86
... federal regulators and then the federal courts that siting a nuclear power plant at Seabrook safety . Pointing to the proposed plant's proximity to the crowded beaches at the New Hampshire and Massachusetts border , the Attorney General ...
... federal regulators and then the federal courts that siting a nuclear power plant at Seabrook safety . Pointing to the proposed plant's proximity to the crowded beaches at the New Hampshire and Massachusetts border , the Attorney General ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
adequate Amesbury applicant assessment ATKINS beach Board of Selectmen Chairman Chernobyl Chernobyl accident Civil Defense communities concerning Conservation and Power containment decision Derrickson Dignan Director discuss documents emergency evacuation Emergency Planning Sensitivity emergency planning zone emergency preparedness emergency response plans Energy Conservation evacuation plan event exercise failure FEMA Governor Dukakis Hampshire Yankee health and safety hearing letter LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Licensing Board low-power testing MARKEY Massachusetts meeting Memo memorandum November 18 NRC staff NRC's nuclear plant nuclear power plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office offsite emergency operating participation planning and preparedness probabilistic risk assessment procedures protective action PSNH public health Public Service questions radiation radioactive Radiological Emergency Response reactor regarding regulations release Representative request RERP risk Seabrook nuclear power Seabrook plant Seabrook Station Shoreham source term SSPSA Update Stratham Subcommittee on Energy submitted Sununu technical Three Mile Island town utility VOLLMER WINGO
Fréquemment cités
Page 226 - ... b. the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to promote world peace, improve the general welfare, increase the standard of living, and strengthen free competition in private enterprise.
Page 226 - States that — a. the development, use, the control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security ; and, b.
Page 152 - Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0396 (EPA 520/1-78-016), December 1978.
Page 190 - the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.
Page 21 - Is that, given the present level of safety being achieved by the operating nuclear power plants In this country, we can expect to see a core meltdown accident within the next 20 years and it Is possible that such an accident could result in off-site releases of radiation which are as large as, or larger than, the releases estimated to have occurred at Chernobyl.
Page 281 - Agency (FEMA) findings and determinations as to whether State and local emergency plans are adequate and capable of being implemented...
Page 285 - No single specific accident sequence should be isolated as the one for which to plan because each accident could have different consequences, both in nature and degree. Further, the range of possible selection for a planning basis is very large, starting with a zero point of requiring no planning at all because significant offsite radiological accident consequences are unlikely to occur, to planning for the worst possible accident, regardless of its extremely low likelihood.
Page 704 - ... accidents" situation. This is not the case. Review of Table 1 on page 17 of the Report reveals the EPZ recommendations actually offer no answer to the detailed planning decisions that must be made. The plume exposure pathway EPZ Is given as "about 10 mile radius*" with the asterisked footnote as follows : "Judgment should be used in adopting this distance based upon considerations of local conditions such as demography, topography, land characteristics, access routes, and local jurisdictional...
Page 195 - OF A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY AT THE PLANT. HOWEVER, THE PROCESS DOES NOT END WITH THE INITIAL APPROVAL. THE STATE AND THE AFFECTED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MUST CONTINUE TO KEEP PLANS UPDATED- THEY MUST ALSO PARTICIPATE IN PERIODIC EXERCISES WITH THE UTILITY AS A CONDITION OF CONTINUED FEMA APPROVALFEMA AND NRC HAVE ALSO SIGNED A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU), MOST RECENTLY REVISED IN APRIL 1985.
Page 479 - ... of the sum of prompt fatality risks resulting from other accidents to which members of the US population are generally exposed.