Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, November 18, 1986U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - 707 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 6-10 sur 100
Page 76
... Federal law and Federal regulations , and that is to deter- mine the adequacy of emergency plans for the Massachusetts com- munities near Seabrook . Let me state at the outset something that should be obvious : Emergency plans do not ...
... Federal law and Federal regulations , and that is to deter- mine the adequacy of emergency plans for the Massachusetts com- munities near Seabrook . Let me state at the outset something that should be obvious : Emergency plans do not ...
Page 77
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can occur within 30 minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that radiation can reach a radius of 5 miles within 2 hours . Massachusetts ...
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can occur within 30 minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that radiation can reach a radius of 5 miles within 2 hours . Massachusetts ...
Page 83
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can take place thirty minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that the radiation can reach out to a radius of five miles within two hours ...
... Federal guidelines further instruct us that a major release of radiation can take place thirty minutes after the onset of an accident at a nuclear plant , and that the radiation can reach out to a radius of five miles within two hours ...
Page 85
... Federal regulations mean what they say , that emergency plans must be " adequate to protect the public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency . " We have looked hard at emergency planning for Seabrook . We do not ...
... Federal regulations mean what they say , that emergency plans must be " adequate to protect the public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency . " We have looked hard at emergency planning for Seabrook . We do not ...
Page 86
... federal regulators and then the federal courts that siting a nuclear power plant at Seabrook ignored considerations of public safety . Pointing to the proposed plant's proximity to the crowded beaches at the New Hampshire and ...
... federal regulators and then the federal courts that siting a nuclear power plant at Seabrook ignored considerations of public safety . Pointing to the proposed plant's proximity to the crowded beaches at the New Hampshire and ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
adequate Amesbury applicant assessment ATKINS beach Board of Selectmen Chairman Chernobyl Chernobyl accident Civil Defense communities concerning Conservation and Power containment decision Derrickson Dignan Director discuss documents emergency evacuation Emergency Planning Sensitivity emergency planning zone emergency preparedness emergency response plans Energy Conservation evacuation plan event exercise facility failure FEMA Governor Dukakis Hampshire Yankee health and safety hearing letter Licensing Board low-power testing MARKEY Massachusetts meeting Memo memorandum November 18 NRC staff NRC's nuclear plant nuclear power plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office offsite emergency operating participation planning and preparedness probabilistic risk assessment procedures protective action PSNH public health Public Service questions radiation radioactive Radiological Emergency Response reactor regarding regulations release Representative request RERP risk Seabrook nuclear power Seabrook plant Seabrook Station Shoreham source term SSPSA Update Stratham Subcommittee on Energy submitted Sununu technical Three Mile Island town utility VOLLMER Washington WINGO
Fréquemment cités
Page 221 - States that : (a) The development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security.
Page 221 - SECTION 1. DECLARATION. — Atomic energy is capable of application for peaceful as well as military purposes. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that— "a. the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security ; and "b.
Page 24 - TMI, we must not assume that an accident of this or greater seriousness cannot happen again, even if the changes we recommend are made. Therefore, in addition to doing everything to prevent such accidents, we must be fully prepared to minimize the potential impact of such an accident on public health and safety, should one occur in the future.
Page 152 - ... d. a program to encourage widespread participation in the development and utilization of atomic energy for peaceful purposes to the maximum extent consistent with the common defense and security and with the health and safety of the public; e.
Page 276 - The NRC will base its finding on a review of the FEMA findings and determinations as to whether State and local emergency plans are adequate and capable of being implemented, and on the NRC assessment as to whether the licensee's emergency plans are adequate and capable of being implemented.
Page 185 - the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.
Page 24 - Is that, given the present level of safety being achieved by the operating nuclear power plants In this country, we can expect to see a core meltdown accident within the next 20 years and it Is possible that such an accident could result in off-site releases of radiation which are as large as, or larger than, the releases estimated to have occurred at Chernobyl.
Page 147 - Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0396 (EPA 520/1-78-016), December 1978.
Page 474 - ... of the sum of prompt fatality risks resulting from other accidents to which members of the US population are generally exposed.
Page 285 - ... presumes that offslte Individuals may become contaminated with radioactive material or may be exposed to dangerous levels of radiation or perhaps both. Planning for emergencies 1s required as a prudent risk reduction measure for these Individuals. Since a range of accidents with widely differing offslte consequences can be postulated, the regulation does not depend on the assumption that a particular type of accident may or will occur. In fact, no specific accident sequences should be specified...