The Performance of Federal CIOs: How Do They Compare to CIOs in the Private Sector? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session, March 24, 2000U.S. Government Printing Office, 2001 - 87 pages |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
acquisitions administrative agency heads appointed approval areas authority budget Bureau of Information business needs central processing unit Chairman challenges CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICERS CIO models CIO position CIO reports CIO roles CIO's Clinger-Cohen Act commissioner of information committee credibility data processing Department director Doll DOUG OSE effective ensure equipment established executive management Federal agencies Federal CIO Council Federal Government Flyzik focus focused functions governmentwide Governor HORN human capital implement Information and Telecommunications information management Information Resources Management information systems Information technology governing information technology management information technology plan information technology resource Information Technology Services issues Knutson Koskinen leadership Leading Organizations MCCLURE measures NASIRE operational organizational performance personal computers personnel private sector programs REPRESENTING THE CHIEF Resources Management Commission responsibilities Rowe Companies senior skills South Dakota standards statewide STEPHEN HORN Sub-cabinet level technical Telecommunications Network TURNER
Fréquemment cités
Page 28 - I want to thank the Chairman and the other members of the Subcommittee for your continued support and encouragement toward the improvement of information technology performance and accountability in the Federal Government.
Page 50 - ... Secretary from persons nominated pursuant to §981.32, or, at the discretion of the Secretary, from other qualified persons, for a term of office beginning March 1. Members and alternates shall continue to serve until their respective successors are selected and qualified. (b) The term of office of members of the Board shall be for a period of three years beginning on March 1 of the years selected except where otherwise provided. However, for the initial eight members of the Board selected pursuant...
Page 23 - I would be happy to respond to any questions that you or Members of the Subcommittee may have. Contact and Acknowledgment For future contacts regarding this testimony, please contact John H.
Page 27 - Without your support we would not have been able to achieve the National success we have enjoyed with Y2K, the Internet and I ''-Government.
Page 12 - In January 2000. the White House released its National Plan for Information Systems Protection' as a first major element of a more comprehensive effort to protect the nation's information systems and critical assets from future attacks.
Page 62 - The dismissal, promotion, demotion, or [compensation] of any public employee, or the disciplining of such employee or investigating of charges against him, unless the employee affected shall have requested an open meeting. (b) The hiring of any person as a public employee. (c) Matters which, if discussed in public, would be likely to affect adversely the reputation of any person, other than a member of the body itself.
Page 53 - Ohio to communicate to the general assembly on the first day of each regular session thereof, an estimate of the aggregate amount of money necessary to be contributed by the state during the two years next ensuing as its proper portion of the state insurance fund.