H.R. 245 and Trans-Alaskan Pipeline System Tariffs: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on General Oversight and the Economy of the Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, Washington, DC, June 18, 1985U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - 274 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 48
Page 1
... ultimately on all consumers of oil . It is my hope that today's hearing will give all parties directly and indirectly affected by the tariffs an opportunity to express ( 1 ) their views so that we have a better understanding of.
... ultimately on all consumers of oil . It is my hope that today's hearing will give all parties directly and indirectly affected by the tariffs an opportunity to express ( 1 ) their views so that we have a better understanding of.
Page 6
... parties , it will be filed with the FERC on 1 / The agreement cannot become final until all of the papers required to be submitted under FERC Rule of Practice and Procedure 602 are presented to the Commission . Given the scope of this ...
... parties , it will be filed with the FERC on 1 / The agreement cannot become final until all of the papers required to be submitted under FERC Rule of Practice and Procedure 602 are presented to the Commission . Given the scope of this ...
Page 7
... parties to the proceeding and interested persons will have 20 days in which to file comments with the FERC . The impact of TAPS tariffs on the collection of federal tax receipts is one of several important concerns that have been taken ...
... parties to the proceeding and interested persons will have 20 days in which to file comments with the FERC . The impact of TAPS tariffs on the collection of federal tax receipts is one of several important concerns that have been taken ...
Page 13
... parties to these contracts have acknowledged that the TAPS tariffs are provisional in nature and that subsequent ad- justment in costs would be made based on the final TAPS tariffs . In addition , the Mandatory Petroleum Price ...
... parties to these contracts have acknowledged that the TAPS tariffs are provisional in nature and that subsequent ad- justment in costs would be made based on the final TAPS tariffs . In addition , the Mandatory Petroleum Price ...
Page 19
... parties who complained began a settlement negotia- tion with the Williams Brothers Pipeline . Williams Brothers said , " All right , it looks like we lost in the Court of Appeals , " tabled about $ 25- $ 27 million for the shippers ...
... parties who complained began a settlement negotia- tion with the Williams Brothers Pipeline . Williams Brothers said , " All right , it looks like we lost in the Court of Appeals , " tabled about $ 25- $ 27 million for the shippers ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
Alaska Pipeline Alaska Pipeline System ASRC barrel BATTESE BEDELL billion BLUM calculations capacity capital Capline Chairman common carrier competition consumers crude oil debt Department of Justice depreciated original cost deregulation dollars Energy Regulatory Commission equity Federal Energy Regulatory FERC FERC's filed gas pipelines hearing income taxes independent inflation Initial Decision interest investment issues June 18 litigation lower McGIMPSEY ment monopoly Nicholas Mavroules nonowners North Slope Offer of Settlement oil companies oil pipeline OLIN original cost methodology ownership percent petroleum Petroleum Marketers Association Phase Pipeline Company pipeline owners pipeline rates production proposed settlement Prudhoe Bay rate base rate of return refinery refunds regulation result revenue Settlement Agreement Settlement Offer shipped shippers SISISKY Sisk Sohio Subcommittee tanker TAPS Carriers TAPS owners TAPS proceeding TAPS rate TAPS tariffs tariff rates throughput Tosco Tosco Corporation Trans-Alaska Pipeline System transportation wellhead wellhead price Williams II windfall profits tax
Fréquemment cités
Page 46 - I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document upon all parties of record In this proceeding by mailing, postage prepaid (or by delivering In person) a copy to each such party.
Page 18 - Independent Oilmen's Association of New England Fuel Merchants Association of New Jersey New Mexico Petroleum Marketers Association Empire State Petroleum Association North Carolina Petroleum Marketers Association Northwest Petroleum Association Ohio Petroleum Marketers Association Oklahoma Oil Marketers Association Oregon Petroleum Marketers Association Pennsylvania Petroleum Association, Inc.
Page 102 - Under the statutory standard of "just and reasonable" it is the result reached not the method employed which is controlling. It is not theory but the impact of the rate order which counts. If the total effect of the rate order cannot be said to be unjust and unreasonable, judicial inquiry under the Act is at an end.
Page 18 - Association Northwest Petroleum Association Ohio Petroleum Marketers Association Oklahoma Oil Marketers Association Oregon Petroleum Marketers Association Pennsylvania Petroleum Association, Inc. South Carolina Oil Jobbers Association South Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association Tennessee Oil Marketers Association Texas...
Page 105 - ... to allow the relevant administrative agency to attempt for itself to build a viable modern precedent for use in future cases that not only reaches the right result, but does so by way of ratemaking criteria free of the problems that appear to exist in the ICC's approach.
Page 253 - If I can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely Daniel L.
Page 53 - Are there any further questions? If not, thank you very much, gentlemen, for all of your appearances here today.
Page 17 - Again, thank you for the opportunity to appear, and I will be happy to answer any questions.
Page 130 - Gulf's future requirements, Gulf would benefit by becoming an owner rather than a shipper, as a shipper would have to deal with several of the owners to obtain space and could not be assured of obtaining the required...
Page 101 - The adoption of present value of the utility's property as the rate base was urged in 1893 on behalf of the community, and it was adopted by the courts largely as a protection against inflated claims based on what were then deemed inflated prices of the past.