Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal year 1985: hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, on S. 2414 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984 - 4470 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 53
Page 2899
... mean the first one to deploy ? Dr. DELAUER . Yes . I used the question of deployment in a MIRV'ed , not on the ground . Senator COHEN . Are you saying we would get an ABM system in place before they could increase their MIRV capability ...
... mean the first one to deploy ? Dr. DELAUER . Yes . I used the question of deployment in a MIRV'ed , not on the ground . Senator COHEN . Are you saying we would get an ABM system in place before they could increase their MIRV capability ...
Page 2917
... mean that we recommended intensive efforts only on those tech- nical issues upon which the ultimate feasibility of an effective ballistic missile defense hinges . As a corollary to this , we recommended deferring development of well ...
... mean that we recommended intensive efforts only on those tech- nical issues upon which the ultimate feasibility of an effective ballistic missile defense hinges . As a corollary to this , we recommended deferring development of well ...
Page 2918
... mean that the program must be structured so that its manager can shift resources from less promising to more ... means to discrimi- nate between decoys and warheads ; we could not simultaneously manage thou- sands of engagements ...
... mean that the program must be structured so that its manager can shift resources from less promising to more ... means to discrimi- nate between decoys and warheads ; we could not simultaneously manage thou- sands of engagements ...
Page 2927
... means 200 or 300 American cities at least are destroyed . It seems to me we had better make it clear if the collateral benefits are to protect populations , that is one thing , but if the concept that we are striving for is population ...
... means 200 or 300 American cities at least are destroyed . It seems to me we had better make it clear if the collateral benefits are to protect populations , that is one thing , but if the concept that we are striving for is population ...
Page 2928
... mean that we should not go ahead with research in this field , but I think you people need to provide some cost estimates and come up with them pretty fast . This Congress is already talking about big cuts in the defense budget . I ...
... mean that we should not go ahead with research in this field , but I think you people need to provide some cost estimates and come up with them pretty fast . This Congress is already talking about big cuts in the defense budget . I ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Posture statement United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services Affichage du livre entier - 1982 |
Tactical warfare United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services Affichage du livre entier - 1982 |
Expressions et termes fréquents
ABM Treaty ABRAHAMSON ahead allies Ambassador SMITH arms control assistant to Senator attack ballistic missile defense battle management believe billion boost phase boosters Chairman chemical laser concept COOPER countermeasures cruise missiles decision decoys defense against ballistic defensive capability Defensive Technologies Study defensive transition DELAUER deleted deploy deployment deterrence directed energy weapons effective defense effort fiscal year 1985 Fletcher future GARWIN goal going ICBM IKLE intercept interceptors launch ment midcourse military MILLER near-term nology nuclear war nuclear weapons offensive forces options panel penetration aids post-boost potential President President's protect question radar reduce reentry vehicles research program retaliatory forces Secretary of Defense Senator BINGAMAN Senator COHEN Senator EXON Senator GOLDWATER Senator LEVIN Senator NUNN Senator QUAYLE Senator WARNER Senator WILSON sensors silos Soviet Union space space-based stability statement Strategic Defense Initiative surveillance survivability talking target tech technical tegic testimony threat United warheads
Fréquemment cités
Page 3115 - Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country.
Page 3115 - Treaty; (f) consider, as appropriate, possible proposals for further increasing the viability of this Treaty, including proposals for amendments in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty; (g) consider, as appropriate, proposals for further measures aimed at limiting strategic arms.
Page 3119 - To assure the viability and effectiveness of this Treaty, each Party undertakes not to transfer to other States, and not to deploy outside its national territory, ABM systems or their components limited by this Treaty.
Page 3118 - Treaty, each Party shall use national technical means of verification at its disposal in a manner consistent with generally recognized principles of international law.
Page 3115 - XVI 1. This Treaty shall be subject to ratification in accordance with the constitutional procedures of each Party.
Page 3118 - States Parties to the Treaty undertake not to place in orbit around the earth any objects carrying nuclear weapons or any other kinds of weapons of mass destruction, install such weapons on celestial bodies, or station such weapons in outer space in any other manner.
Page 3115 - Each Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of this Treaty have jeopardized its supreme interests.
Page 3115 - May 26, 1972, in two copies, each in the English and Russian languages, both texts being equally authentic.
Page 3084 - Let me share with you a vision of the future which offers hope. It is that we embark on a program to counter the awesome Soviet missile threat with measures that are defensive.
Page 3117 - XIV 1. Each Party may propose amendments to this Treaty. Agreed amendments shall enter into force in accordance with the procedures governing the entry into force of this Treaty.