State and Local Law Enforcement Wiretapping of Confidential Conversations, Including Those Between Criminal Defendants and Their Lawyers: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, First Session, December 18, 1989
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991 - 406 pages
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
action activities agencies allowed Amendment appears application approval Association attorney attorney-client authorized barracks calls cause civil clients command Commission Committee communications concerning conduct CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Connecticut consent constitutional conversations counsel court Crime criminal damages December defendants Department device directive Document effect electronic surveillance equipment established evidence exception expectation facilities fact federal fourth hearing illegal individuals interception involved issue judicial Justice KASTENMEIER law enforcement lawyer LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limited lines means monitoring MORRISON notice obtained officer oral party person plaintiffs police police departments police officers practice prison privileged probable problems procedures prohibition protection questions reasonable requirement response result rule situation specific standard statement statute suspects tape recording telephone telephone calls telephone conversations tion Title Troop United violation warrant wire wiretapping
Page 251 - It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception.
Page 374 - The presence of the seal provided for by this subsection, or a satisfactory explanation for the absence thereof, shall be a prerequisite for the use or disclosure of the contents of any wire or oral communication or evidence derived therefrom under subsection (3) of section 2517.
Page 147 - I, , do solemnly, swear (or affirm) that I will support and maintain the constitution and laws of the United States, and the constitution and laws of the state of...
Page 339 - ... (f ) where the application is for the extension of an order, a statement setting forth the results thus far obtained from the Interception, or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain such results.
Page 177 - The Government's activities in electronically listening to and recording the petitioner's words violated the privacy upon which he justifiably relied while using the telephone booth and thus constituted a "search and seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
Page 340 - ... showing of probable cause. The standards for the measurement of probable cause have often been explicated in the opinions of this Court; see, eg, United States v.
Page 91 - ... (b) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for an officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, In the normal course of his employment and in discharge of the monitoring responsibilities exercised by the Commission in the enforcement of chapter 5 of title 47 of the United States Code, to intercept a wire...
Page 372 - ... (8) (a) The contents of an v wire or oral communication intercepted by any means authorized by this chapter shall, if possible, be recorded on tape or wire or other comparable device.
Page 91 - ... by a station operating on an authorized frequency within the bands allocated to the amateur, citizens band, or general mobile radio services...