 | Ivo H. Daalder, James M. Lindsay - 2003 - 286 pages
...war doctrines of deterrence and containment were no longer a sufficient basis for defending America. "Deterrence — the promise of massive retaliation...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies." The United States could not rely on treaties signed by tyrants. And while homeland and missile defense... | |
 | Jeffrey T. Bergner - 2003 - 236 pages
...the prime aggressors we faced had a specific face and address. As President Bush said at West Point: "Deterrence, the promise of massive retaliation against...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies." Indeed, the identity of all those responsible even for September 1 1 remains unknown. Among them were... | |
 | Nancy Snow - 2003 - 180 pages
...also require new thinking. Deterrence—the promise of massive retaliation against nations—means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with no...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies... the war on terror will not be won on the defensive. We must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his... | |
 | Robert J. Art - 2003 - 352 pages
..."Deterrence — the promise of massive retaliation against nations — means nothing against shadowy networks with no nation or citizens to defend. Containment...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies." Both at <www.whitehouse.gov>. 9. For critiques of primacy, see Robert Jervis, "International Primacy:... | |
 | Seyom Brown - 2004 - 220 pages
...with the world's most destructive weapons." Full text in The Ncw York Times, January 20, 2002. tors with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies. . . . Homeland defense and missile defense are a part of stronger security, and they're essential priorities... | |
 | Philip Gordon, Jeremy Shapiro - 2004 - 274 pages
...cadets, Bush described a "threat with no precedent" that "required new thinking." He said, "Deterrence means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with...defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. ... If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long." Bush thus promised... | |
 | Elaine C. Hagopian - 2004 - 340 pages
...massive retaliation against nations — means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with no nations or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies ... If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long. Despite the fact that... | |
 | Sam Pender - 2004 - 414 pages
...Speaking to the graduating class at the US Military Academy at West Point. New York, President Bush said "Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators...or secretly provide them to terrorist allies.... We have our best chance since the rise of the nation state in the 17th century to build a world where... | |
 | Sam Pender - 2004 - 532 pages
...Speaking to the graduating class at the US Military Academy at West Point, New York, President Bush said "Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators...or secretly provide them to terrorist allies.... We have our best chance since the rise of the nation state in the 17th century to build a world where... | |
 | Charles Tiefer - 2004 - 466 pages
...institutions would support. In announcing this new doctrine at West Point in June 2002, Bush said, "Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators...missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies.... [Since] the only path to safety is the path of action ... our security will require all Americans ...... | |
| |
Deterrence — the promise of massive retaliation against nations — means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with no nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver... 
