National Park Service's Draft Management Policies: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Parks of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Partie 2U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006 - 81 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-4 sur 4
Page 8
... removed a paragraph from existing policy that further clarified the Organic Act's inter- pretation by referring to court cases and what they've done . They didn't restore all of the court language , but they did summarize , to say it ...
... removed a paragraph from existing policy that further clarified the Organic Act's inter- pretation by referring to court cases and what they've done . They didn't restore all of the court language , but they did summarize , to say it ...
Page 11
... removed a paragraph that fur- ther clarified the Organic Act's interpretation by referring to court cases that de ... removal of harm . We raised strong concerns that the draft was not , in fact , appro- priately balanced , because it de ...
... removed a paragraph that fur- ther clarified the Organic Act's interpretation by referring to court cases that de ... removal of harm . We raised strong concerns that the draft was not , in fact , appro- priately balanced , because it de ...
Page 12
... removed from the new draft . Third Party Enforceability : We objected to the new provision that says that the policies do not create any enforceable benefit by a party in a suit against the United States . This provision remains in the ...
... removed from the new draft . Third Party Enforceability : We objected to the new provision that says that the policies do not create any enforceable benefit by a party in a suit against the United States . This provision remains in the ...
Page 13
... removing the offending new provisions . Natural Sounds : The Hoffman and October drafts removed the protection of " the atmosphere of peace and tranquility and natural soundscapes " from the criteria for unacceptable impacts . In fact ...
... removing the offending new provisions . Natural Sounds : The Hoffman and October drafts removed the protection of " the atmosphere of peace and tranquility and natural soundscapes " from the criteria for unacceptable impacts . In fact ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
1916 Organic Act agement policies American appropriate areas avoid harm believe Biscayne National Park changes clean air committee concerns conflict between conserving cooperative conservation CRAIG THOMAS cultural resources decisions document final rule harm to cultural hearing Hoffman and October impairment Intra-Coastal Waterway issue JEFF BINGAMAN June draft restores KEN SALAZAR Kiernan LAMAR ALEXANDER language management policies MEL MARTINEZ ment National Park Service National Park System National Parks Conservation NEPA analysis NPCA NPS employees October drafts park management park resources Park Service employees park superintendent Parks Conservation Association personal watercraft predominant PREPARED STATEMENT previous drafts PWC ban PWIA revised draft policies ROBERT MENENDEZ Secretary Kempthorne Senator Akaka Senator ALEXANDER Senator Salazar Senator THOMAS servation snow machines soundscapes Steve Martin subcommittee testified Thank tion tional Park traditionally associated groups U.S. SENATOR unacceptable impacts unimpaired for future values of traditionally wilderness
Fréquemment cités
Page 7 - The service thus established shall promote and regulate the use of the Federal areas known as national parks, monuments, and reservations hereinafter specified by such means and measures as conform to . the fundamental purpose of the said parks, monuments, and reservations, which purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment...
Page 9 - First, that the national parks must be maintained in absolutely unimpaired form for the use of future generations as well as those of our own time ; second, that they are set apart for the use, observation, health, and pleasure of the people; and third, that the national interest must dictate all decisions affecting public or private enterprise in the parks.
Page 4 - I thank you again for holding this hearing and I look forward to...
Page 9 - Since 1919, the nonpartisan National Parks Conservation Association has been the leading voice of the American people in protecting and enhancing our National Park System for present and future generations. Today we have 300,000 members nationwide who visit and care deeply about our national parks.
Page 10 - For the NPS professionals, conserving the parks unimpaired for future generations is synonymous with offering park visitors today a high quality experience. Scenic vistas should be clear, natural sounds should dominate over man-made noises, native wildlife should be abundant and visible for visitors, historic sites such as battlefields should look like they did when the historic events occurred, and park visitor facilities should not be located so as to disturb the natural scene or the cultural landscape.
Page 9 - Thank you very much for the opportunity to testify this morning. [The prepared statement of Mr. Kiernan follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF THOMAS C. KIERNAN, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today.
Page 7 - National parks are the best idea we ever had. Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst. WALLACE STEGNER...
Page 10 - Now that the revision process is poised to conclude while doing no harm, what is needed is for the broad constituency of interests that are engaged with the National Park Service— recreation, tourism, gateway communities, conservation, preservation, and regular "good citizens...
Page 10 - NPS is achieving the proper balance between uses of the parks for today, and conserving them unimpaired for future generations. These conflicts usually erupt over day-to-day management of particular parks, and the decisions that the NPS makes as it goes through periodic management planning.
Page 6 - NPS's commitment to the public's appropriate use and enjoyment, including education and interpretation, of park resources, while preventing unacceptable impacts...