National Park Service's Draft Management Policies: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Parks of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Partie 2U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006 - 81 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 5
Page 5
... groups like the National Parks Conservation Association and many others . We wanted to assure that the process of comment and evaluation was thorough . We assembled a group of National Park Service employ- ees that included park ...
... groups like the National Parks Conservation Association and many others . We wanted to assure that the process of comment and evaluation was thorough . We assembled a group of National Park Service employ- ees that included park ...
Page 6
... groups , NPS employees , the Department , and other federal and state agencies . The number and content of the ... group of NPS employees that included park superintendents , managers , and pro- gram specialists . This knowledgeable team ...
... groups , NPS employees , the Department , and other federal and state agencies . The number and content of the ... group of NPS employees that included park superintendents , managers , and pro- gram specialists . This knowledgeable team ...
Page 9
... groups as the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees , the Outdoor Industry Associa- tion , the National Council of Churches , and more than 50,000 citizens around our nation , as well as by many members of this subcommittee . We ...
... groups as the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees , the Outdoor Industry Associa- tion , the National Council of Churches , and more than 50,000 citizens around our nation , as well as by many members of this subcommittee . We ...
Page 20
... groups . ” The com- ments in the 2006 draft are that the provision was deleted because it is addressed in section 2 ; however , we have not been able to find a similar statement in that section . This is a very important issue in my ...
... groups . ” The com- ments in the 2006 draft are that the provision was deleted because it is addressed in section 2 ; however , we have not been able to find a similar statement in that section . This is a very important issue in my ...
Page 22
... group under the guise of environmentalism and it de- clared PWC guilty until proven innocent . This is why PWIA consistently stresses the need to balance the competing demands . The PWC rule is a perfect case study be- cause today ...
... group under the guise of environmentalism and it de- clared PWC guilty until proven innocent . This is why PWIA consistently stresses the need to balance the competing demands . The PWC rule is a perfect case study be- cause today ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
1916 Organic Act agement policies American appropriate areas avoid harm believe Biscayne National Park changes clean air committee concerns conflict between conserving cooperative conservation CRAIG THOMAS cultural resources decisions document final rule harm to cultural hearing Hoffman and October impairment Intra-Coastal Waterway issue JEFF BINGAMAN June draft restores KEN SALAZAR Kiernan LAMAR ALEXANDER language management policies MEL MARTINEZ ment National Park Service National Park System National Parks Conservation NEPA analysis NPCA NPS employees October drafts park management park resources Park Service employees park superintendent Parks Conservation Association personal watercraft predominant PREPARED STATEMENT previous drafts PWC ban PWIA revised draft policies ROBERT MENENDEZ Secretary Kempthorne Senator Akaka Senator ALEXANDER Senator Salazar Senator THOMAS servation snow machines soundscapes Steve Martin subcommittee testified Thank tion tional Park traditionally associated groups U.S. SENATOR unacceptable impacts unimpaired for future values of traditionally wilderness
Fréquemment cités
Page 7 - The service thus established shall promote and regulate the use of the Federal areas known as national parks, monuments, and reservations hereinafter specified by such means and measures as conform to . the fundamental purpose of the said parks, monuments, and reservations, which purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment...
Page 9 - First, that the national parks must be maintained in absolutely unimpaired form for the use of future generations as well as those of our own time ; second, that they are set apart for the use, observation, health, and pleasure of the people; and third, that the national interest must dictate all decisions affecting public or private enterprise in the parks.
Page 4 - I thank you again for holding this hearing and I look forward to...
Page 9 - Since 1919, the nonpartisan National Parks Conservation Association has been the leading voice of the American people in protecting and enhancing our National Park System for present and future generations. Today we have 300,000 members nationwide who visit and care deeply about our national parks.
Page 10 - For the NPS professionals, conserving the parks unimpaired for future generations is synonymous with offering park visitors today a high quality experience. Scenic vistas should be clear, natural sounds should dominate over man-made noises, native wildlife should be abundant and visible for visitors, historic sites such as battlefields should look like they did when the historic events occurred, and park visitor facilities should not be located so as to disturb the natural scene or the cultural landscape.
Page 9 - Thank you very much for the opportunity to testify this morning. [The prepared statement of Mr. Kiernan follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF THOMAS C. KIERNAN, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today.
Page 7 - National parks are the best idea we ever had. Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst. WALLACE STEGNER...
Page 10 - Now that the revision process is poised to conclude while doing no harm, what is needed is for the broad constituency of interests that are engaged with the National Park Service— recreation, tourism, gateway communities, conservation, preservation, and regular "good citizens...
Page 10 - NPS is achieving the proper balance between uses of the parks for today, and conserving them unimpaired for future generations. These conflicts usually erupt over day-to-day management of particular parks, and the decisions that the NPS makes as it goes through periodic management planning.
Page 6 - NPS's commitment to the public's appropriate use and enjoyment, including education and interpretation, of park resources, while preventing unacceptable impacts...