National Park Service's Draft Management Policies: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Parks of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Partie 2U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006 - 81 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 7
Page 6
... cooperation with local , state , Tribal , and federal entities , Support pursuit of the best contemporary business ... cooperative conservation and civic en- gagement , · Employ a tone that leaves no room for misunderstanding the NPS's ...
... cooperation with local , state , Tribal , and federal entities , Support pursuit of the best contemporary business ... cooperative conservation and civic en- gagement , · Employ a tone that leaves no room for misunderstanding the NPS's ...
Page 7
... cooperative con- servation at all levels of park management . This revised draft emphasizes to our managers that decisions based on sound public input are better for parks and more supportive of surrounding communities . The management ...
... cooperative con- servation at all levels of park management . This revised draft emphasizes to our managers that decisions based on sound public input are better for parks and more supportive of surrounding communities . The management ...
Page 9
... Cooperative Conservation could be read to say that the Park Service must reach agreement with all communities before taking action . The new draft appropriately leaves cooperative conservation language in there , but includes a ...
... Cooperative Conservation could be read to say that the Park Service must reach agreement with all communities before taking action . The new draft appropriately leaves cooperative conservation language in there , but includes a ...
Page 12
... cooperation in Section 1.6 ( Cooperative Conservation Be- yond Park Boundaries ) the June draft specifies that the Service " will not relinquish any of its authority ” when participating in a park network . In addition , the ability of ...
... cooperation in Section 1.6 ( Cooperative Conservation Be- yond Park Boundaries ) the June draft specifies that the Service " will not relinquish any of its authority ” when participating in a park network . In addition , the ability of ...
Page 13
... cooperation and consultation in water rights negotiations . The June draft includes language that makes it clear ... cooperate with the Federal Aviation Admin- istration on nearby private airports to achieve better opportunities for ...
... cooperation and consultation in water rights negotiations . The June draft includes language that makes it clear ... cooperate with the Federal Aviation Admin- istration on nearby private airports to achieve better opportunities for ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
1916 Organic Act agement policies American appropriate areas avoid harm believe Biscayne National Park changes clean air committee concerns conflict between conserving cooperative conservation CRAIG THOMAS cultural resources decisions document final rule harm to cultural hearing Hoffman and October impairment Intra-Coastal Waterway issue JEFF BINGAMAN June draft restores KEN SALAZAR Kiernan LAMAR ALEXANDER language management policies MEL MARTINEZ ment National Park Service National Park System National Parks Conservation NEPA analysis NPCA NPS employees October drafts park management park resources Park Service employees park superintendent Parks Conservation Association personal watercraft predominant PREPARED STATEMENT previous drafts PWC ban PWIA revised draft policies ROBERT MENENDEZ Secretary Kempthorne Senator Akaka Senator ALEXANDER Senator Salazar Senator THOMAS servation snow machines soundscapes Steve Martin subcommittee testified Thank tion tional Park traditionally associated groups U.S. SENATOR unacceptable impacts unimpaired for future values of traditionally wilderness
Fréquemment cités
Page 7 - The service thus established shall promote and regulate the use of the Federal areas known as national parks, monuments, and reservations hereinafter specified by such means and measures as conform to . the fundamental purpose of the said parks, monuments, and reservations, which purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment...
Page 9 - First, that the national parks must be maintained in absolutely unimpaired form for the use of future generations as well as those of our own time ; second, that they are set apart for the use, observation, health, and pleasure of the people; and third, that the national interest must dictate all decisions affecting public or private enterprise in the parks.
Page 4 - I thank you again for holding this hearing and I look forward to...
Page 9 - Since 1919, the nonpartisan National Parks Conservation Association has been the leading voice of the American people in protecting and enhancing our National Park System for present and future generations. Today we have 300,000 members nationwide who visit and care deeply about our national parks.
Page 10 - For the NPS professionals, conserving the parks unimpaired for future generations is synonymous with offering park visitors today a high quality experience. Scenic vistas should be clear, natural sounds should dominate over man-made noises, native wildlife should be abundant and visible for visitors, historic sites such as battlefields should look like they did when the historic events occurred, and park visitor facilities should not be located so as to disturb the natural scene or the cultural landscape.
Page 9 - Thank you very much for the opportunity to testify this morning. [The prepared statement of Mr. Kiernan follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF THOMAS C. KIERNAN, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today.
Page 7 - National parks are the best idea we ever had. Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst. WALLACE STEGNER...
Page 10 - Now that the revision process is poised to conclude while doing no harm, what is needed is for the broad constituency of interests that are engaged with the National Park Service— recreation, tourism, gateway communities, conservation, preservation, and regular "good citizens...
Page 10 - NPS is achieving the proper balance between uses of the parks for today, and conserving them unimpaired for future generations. These conflicts usually erupt over day-to-day management of particular parks, and the decisions that the NPS makes as it goes through periodic management planning.
Page 6 - NPS's commitment to the public's appropriate use and enjoyment, including education and interpretation, of park resources, while preventing unacceptable impacts...