Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, November 18, 1986U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - 707 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 100
Page 2
... protect the public . The issues before us are not only questions of fact and judgment , but more impor- tantly the integrity of the regulatory process by which such ques- tions must be evaluated and decisions reached . The subcommittee ...
... protect the public . The issues before us are not only questions of fact and judgment , but more impor- tantly the integrity of the regulatory process by which such ques- tions must be evaluated and decisions reached . The subcommittee ...
Page 4
... protect their interest and their health are rendering impartial judgments arrived at through a process that is open and fair and objective . That is the only way that the public's faith in the credi- bility of the regulatory process can ...
... protect their interest and their health are rendering impartial judgments arrived at through a process that is open and fair and objective . That is the only way that the public's faith in the credi- bility of the regulatory process can ...
Page 5
... protect the health and safety of their citizens . Under the NRC's regulations , certain findings regarding the adequacy of emergency planning must be made before a full - power operating license can be issued ( see below ) . The utility ...
... protect the health and safety of their citizens . Under the NRC's regulations , certain findings regarding the adequacy of emergency planning must be made before a full - power operating license can be issued ( see below ) . The utility ...
Page 7
... protect the health and safety of their citizens . NRC staff appears to have had few misgivings about whether or not their participation in these discussions dignify this effort , and seem immune to considerations of whether their ...
... protect the health and safety of their citizens . NRC staff appears to have had few misgivings about whether or not their participation in these discussions dignify this effort , and seem immune to considerations of whether their ...
Page 9
... protect their citizens in the event of a serious reactor accident . In July 1986 , the NRC issued an interlocutory decision which presumed state and local government cooperation in the event of an emergency . Emergency planning issues ...
... protect their citizens in the event of a serious reactor accident . In July 1986 , the NRC issued an interlocutory decision which presumed state and local government cooperation in the event of an emergency . Emergency planning issues ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
adequate Amesbury applicant assessment ATKINS beach Board of Selectmen Chairman Chernobyl Chernobyl accident Civil Defense communities concerning Conservation and Power containment decision Derrickson Dignan Director discuss documents emergency evacuation Emergency Planning Sensitivity emergency planning zone emergency preparedness emergency response plans Energy Conservation evacuation plan event exercise failure FEMA Governor Dukakis Hampshire Yankee health and safety hearing letter LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Licensing Board low-power testing MARKEY Massachusetts meeting Memo memorandum November 18 NRC staff NRC's nuclear plant nuclear power plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office offsite emergency operating participation planning and preparedness probabilistic risk assessment procedures protective action PSNH public health Public Service questions radiation radioactive Radiological Emergency Response reactor regarding regulations release Representative request RERP risk Seabrook nuclear power Seabrook plant Seabrook Station Shoreham source term SSPSA Update Stratham Subcommittee on Energy submitted Sununu technical Three Mile Island town utility VOLLMER WINGO
Fréquemment cités
Page 226 - ... b. the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to promote world peace, improve the general welfare, increase the standard of living, and strengthen free competition in private enterprise.
Page 226 - States that — a. the development, use, the control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security ; and, b.
Page 152 - Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0396 (EPA 520/1-78-016), December 1978.
Page 190 - the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.
Page 21 - Is that, given the present level of safety being achieved by the operating nuclear power plants In this country, we can expect to see a core meltdown accident within the next 20 years and it Is possible that such an accident could result in off-site releases of radiation which are as large as, or larger than, the releases estimated to have occurred at Chernobyl.
Page 281 - Agency (FEMA) findings and determinations as to whether State and local emergency plans are adequate and capable of being implemented...
Page 285 - No single specific accident sequence should be isolated as the one for which to plan because each accident could have different consequences, both in nature and degree. Further, the range of possible selection for a planning basis is very large, starting with a zero point of requiring no planning at all because significant offsite radiological accident consequences are unlikely to occur, to planning for the worst possible accident, regardless of its extremely low likelihood.
Page 704 - ... accidents" situation. This is not the case. Review of Table 1 on page 17 of the Report reveals the EPZ recommendations actually offer no answer to the detailed planning decisions that must be made. The plume exposure pathway EPZ Is given as "about 10 mile radius*" with the asterisked footnote as follows : "Judgment should be used in adopting this distance based upon considerations of local conditions such as demography, topography, land characteristics, access routes, and local jurisdictional...
Page 195 - OF A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY AT THE PLANT. HOWEVER, THE PROCESS DOES NOT END WITH THE INITIAL APPROVAL. THE STATE AND THE AFFECTED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MUST CONTINUE TO KEEP PLANS UPDATED- THEY MUST ALSO PARTICIPATE IN PERIODIC EXERCISES WITH THE UTILITY AS A CONDITION OF CONTINUED FEMA APPROVALFEMA AND NRC HAVE ALSO SIGNED A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU), MOST RECENTLY REVISED IN APRIL 1985.
Page 479 - ... of the sum of prompt fatality risks resulting from other accidents to which members of the US population are generally exposed.