For Gods, yet able to make Gods of Men: 70 And why not Gods of Men, fince good, the more The author not impair'd, but honor'd more? What life the Gods live there, and fuch live thou, So faying, he drew nigh, and to me held, Ev'n to my mouth of that fame fruit held part Which he had pluck'd; the pleasant savory smell So quicken'd appetite, that I, methought, Could not but tafte, Forthwith Forthwith up to the clouds With him I flew, and underneath beheld 75 80 85 And various: wond'ring at my flight and change My guide was gone, and I, methought, funk down, Beft image of myself and dearer half, dream. Night for the vifions and dreams frequent in it. So Sil. Ital. III. 216. Promiffa evolvit fomni, noctemque retractat. Hume. 94. 90 95 100 105 Our and thus Adam] Adam conformable to his fuperior character for wisdom inftructs and comforts Eve upon this occafion. Addifon. 117. Evil Our knowledge or opinion; then retires Of our last evening's talk, in this thy dream, 115 May come and go, fo unapprov'd, and leave Be not difhearten'd then, nor cloud thofe looks, 117. Evil into the mind of God or Man] God here must fignify Angel, as it frequently does in this poem. For God cannot be tempted with evil, as St. James fays (I. 13.) of the Supreme Being. And Milton had just before (as Mr. Thyer alfo obferves) used the term God in the fame meaning. ver. 59. Nor God nor Man? again ver. 70. Than yet able to make Gods of Men. 129. So chear'd be his fair feaf, and he was cheard] Aman ner of fpeaking that occurs fome times in Scripture, as in Jerem. XX. 7. thou baft deceived me, and I Deigns none to ease thy load and was deceived. tafte thy fweet, 137. But 125 Than when fair morning first smiles on the world; From either eye, and wip'd them with her hair; So all was clear'd, and to the field they haste. But first, from under fhady arborous roof 137. But firft, from under fhady arbo'rous roof Soon as they forth were come &c.] Dr. Bentley proposes arbor's roof: I don't know why: he gives us no reason, and I can think of none. But if the Doctor has made a change, where there was no fault; = he has let a very confiderable fault in this paffage escape without any =change or obfervation. As the comma now ftands after roof, the 130 135 With morning hymn of Adam and Eve is reprefented as faid by them (at one and the fame time) from under the roof, and in the open fight of the fun which is a contradiction. The fenfe plainly requires that the comma fhould be as we hav~ plac'd it; and the conftruction is, But firft they lowly bow'd adoring, ver. 144. as foon as they were come forth from under the roof of the arbor. Pearce. 145.- each With wheels yet hovering o'er the ocean brim, 140 Nor holy rapture wanted they to praise 145 Their Maker, in fit ftrains pronounc'd or fung Flow'd from their lips, in profe or numerous verse, More tuneable than needed lute or harp 845. each morning duly paid In various file;] As it is very well known that our author was no friend to fet forms of prayer, it is no wonder that he afcribes extemporary effufions to our first parents; but even while he attributes ftrains unmeditated to them, he himself imitates the Pfalmift. 153. These are thy glorious works, &c.] The morning hymn is written in imitation of one of thofe Pfalms, where in the overflowings of gratitude and praise the Pfalmift calls not only upon the Angels, but upon the moft confpicuous parts of the inanimate creation, to join with him in extolling their common Maker. Invocations of this nature fill the mind with glorious ideas of 151 To God's works, and awaken that divine enthufiafm, which is fo natural to devotion. But if this calling upon the dead parts of nature is at all times a proper kind of worfhip, it was in a particular manner fuitable to our firft parents, who had the creation fresh upon their minds, and had not feen the various difpenfations of Providence, nor confequently could be acquainted with thofe many topics of praise, which might afford matter to the devotions of their pofterity. I need not remark the beautiful spirit of poetry, which runs thro' this whole hymn, nor the holiness of that refolution with which it concludes. Addi fan. The |