Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session November 18, 1986, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - 707 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 90
Page 12
However , NRC and utility documents indicate that in July , 1985 at least one
member of the NRC met with the utility to discuss the SSPSA submittal and " the
regulatory process including the reassessment of emergency preparedness ...
However , NRC and utility documents indicate that in July , 1985 at least one
member of the NRC met with the utility to discuss the SSPSA submittal and " the
regulatory process including the reassessment of emergency preparedness ...
Page 30
... Garrick NRC , PSNH , PL & G meeting to discuss PSA program July 9 , 1986
July 21 , 1986 PSNH submits the Risk Management and Emergency Planning
Study ( RMEPS ) and the Seabrook Station Emergency Planning Sensitivity
Study to ...
... Garrick NRC , PSNH , PL & G meeting to discuss PSA program July 9 , 1986
July 21 , 1986 PSNH submits the Risk Management and Emergency Planning
Study ( RMEPS ) and the Seabrook Station Emergency Planning Sensitivity
Study to ...
Page 34
... gave many public statements about the regulatory process including the
reassessment of emergency preparedness requirements . Mr . Bernero did
discuss such issues with Mr . William Derrickson and others of PSNH on ( two
occasions .
... gave many public statements about the regulatory process including the
reassessment of emergency preparedness requirements . Mr . Bernero did
discuss such issues with Mr . William Derrickson and others of PSNH on ( two
occasions .
Page 35
07 / 09 / 86 Meeting to discuss PSA program at Bethesda akong NRC , PLG , and
PSNH . 07 / 21 / 86 SBN - 1167 , submits SSPSA Update . 07 / 29 / 86 SBN -
1173 , submits SSPSA Update / Review - discussion . 06 / 86 SMA 1589 .
07 / 09 / 86 Meeting to discuss PSA program at Bethesda akong NRC , PLG , and
PSNH . 07 / 21 / 86 SBN - 1167 , submits SSPSA Update . 07 / 29 / 86 SBN -
1173 , submits SSPSA Update / Review - discussion . 06 / 86 SMA 1589 .
Page 42
07 / 09 / 86 Meeting to discuss PSA program at Bethesda among NRC , PLG ,
and PSNH . 07 / 21 / 86 SBN - 1167 , submits SSPSA Update . 07 / 29 / 86 SBN -
1173 , submits SSPSA Update / Review - discussion . 06 / 86 SMA 1589 .
07 / 09 / 86 Meeting to discuss PSA program at Bethesda among NRC , PLG ,
and PSNH . 07 / 21 / 86 SBN - 1167 , submits SSPSA Update . 07 / 29 / 86 SBN -
1173 , submits SSPSA Update / Review - discussion . 06 / 86 SMA 1589 .
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
accident action additional adequate Agency ANSWER applicant appropriate assessment assurance authority basis believe Board BROWN Chairman Chernobyl citizens Commission Committee communities complete concerning conducted Congress considered construction containment continue conversion cost decision discuss documents emergency planning zone Energy estimates evacuation evacuation plan event exercise facility fact failure Federal FEMA finding given going governments Governor Hampshire hearing House indicated involved issues letter licensing Management MARKEY Massachusetts matter meeting memorandum miles notes NRC staff nuclear power plants Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office offsite operating participate population possible prepared preparedness problems protect PSNH Public Service questions reactor reasonable reduce regarding Region regulations release Representatives request result risk safety Seabrook Station specific Subcommittee submitted technical testing Thank towns Unit update utility Washington Yankee
Fréquemment cités
Page 199 - States that : (a) The development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security.
Page 199 - SECTION 1. DECLARATION. — Atomic energy is capable of application for peaceful as well as military purposes. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that— "a. the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security ; and "b.
Page 171 - the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.
Page 11 - Is that, given the present level of safety being achieved by the operating nuclear power plants In this country, we can expect to see a core meltdown accident within the next 20 years and it Is possible that such an accident could result in off-site releases of radiation which are as large as, or larger than, the releases estimated to have occurred at Chernobyl.
Page 173 - REGIONAL OFFICE COORDINATES THE PLANNING REVIEW AND ASSURES THAT AN EXERCISE IS CONDUCTED TO ADEQUATELY TEST THE PLANS- IT ALSO HOLDS A PUBLIC MEETING TO INFORM INTERESTED PARTIES OF THE CONTENT OF THE PLANS AND WHAT WOULD BE EXPECTED OF THE PUBLIC IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY AT THE PLANT. THE PLANS ARE APPROVED BY THE FEMA ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF STATE AND LOCAL PROGRAMS AND SUPPORT.
Page 313 - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges: Ivan W.
Page 70 - ... there exists a State, local, or utility plan which provides reasonable assurance that public health and safety is not endangered by operation of the facility concerned.
Page 392 - ... of the sum of prompt fatality risks resulting from other accidents to which members of the US population are generally exposed.
Page 243 - ... presumes that offslte Individuals may become contaminated with radioactive material or may be exposed to dangerous levels of radiation or perhaps both. Planning for emergencies 1s required as a prudent risk reduction measure for these Individuals. Since a range of accidents with widely differing offslte consequences can be postulated, the regulation does not depend on the assumption that a particular type of accident may or will occur. In fact, no specific accident sequences should be specified...
Page 57 - Commission ensures that the civilian uses of nuclear materials and facilities are conducted in a manner consistent with the public health and safety, environmental quality, national security, and the antitrust laws.
Informations bibliographiques
| Titre | Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session November 18, 1986, Volume 4 Emergency Planning at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session November 18, 1986, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power |
| Auteur | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power |
| Éditeur | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 |
| Longueur | 707 pages |
| Exporter la citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |