Speak to these people to get background, clecide how to go

Uncaci neview.

Purpose of this meeting, nough program plen from when we
Stented ad. Then: was this arquered made of tech. grands.

EPZ

this could serve

as a lechnical arquement. If not, he won't file. Point out which tact. argument

Cont

Cont. By paus Scencurica

an good rs. No

Are the argument pebuasive agained

0396 benchmark?

Jurden. 0396. byfor TMI / adopted because of TAI
Not having doors causing bidugicel damage
- insicle Prot. Action Guides (1-SR)

рабо

Buol Seabrook has "thrown

awxy cort. failure".

cort asames cont. failures / Soubrook says This is difference between a dowments.

it won't

Seabrook et I mi EPZ is same as

WISH 1400 2+ 10 mi EP2

Not that core mut

look et

is lower, but guen this then reduction is prob. of conscy as of Scabrook design (cont.) But with butter cont. mud look et Event V( Cunt. Bypass)

impror. in

Cont. Failur, Event V, end Cont. Bypass

Prob

%

7 hour limited manay pusutation for Aug 6-nueting

what will they like to want is

• Joelen- duelos Us related to the intep of 0396. then what they diel.

81520

EPZ Study Alecting

MEETING BETWEEN NRC STAFF AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF

NEW HAMPSHIRE, OWNERS OF THE SEABROOK NUCLEAR STATION

.

THE PURPOSE

"WALK-THRU"

OF THE ALEETING IS FOR PSNH TO PROVIDE
OF STUDY FOR NRC STAFF

OFA

SEABROOK STATION EMERGENCY PLANNING
SENSITIVITY STUDY FILED WITH NRC. ON JULY 2
PONH'S TECHNICAL BASIS FOR
REQUIRED FOR FUTURE EMERGENCY PLANNING

PROVIDES

WHAT ALIGHT BE

шовк

STUDY USES THE WASH-1400 SOURCE TERMS
INCLUDE RECENT SOURCE TERAL REDUCTIONS

TERMS;

RESULTS DO NOT

NRC

15 BEGINMNG EXPEDITED REVIEW OF THE STUDY TO ASSESS THE TECHNICAL ADEQUACY OF PONHS ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT THE STUDY'S CONCLUSIONS.

BEFORE TURNING THE MEETING OVER TO PSNH
ADD ANYTHING?

Enclosed is one copy of a proposal to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission entitled, "Review of the Emergency Planning Sensitivity Study for Seabrook," FIN A-3852, being submitted for your review and approval. The proposal is being submitted in response to a verbal request from D. Fioravante of the NRC. Two copies have been sent to Mr. R. W. Barber, Department of Energy, one copy has been sent to Mr. M. Kaltman, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and three copies have been sent to:

The total cost of this program is $245,000. No funds have been obligated to date.

This proposal has been prepared in accordance with discussions held between W. T. Pratt (BNL), C. Hofmayer (BNL) and NRC staff. If there are any questions regarding the document, please call the principal investigator or Mr. A. J. Romano, FTS 666-4024, Department Administrator for the Department of Nuclear Energy.