Oversight of the Patent and Trademark Office: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, Second Session, on Activities of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), Department of Commerce, Focusing on PTO's Automated Patent System Program, May 12, 1992, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993 - 403 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 100
Page 23
... decision has yet been made regarding the nature of the early patent application publication system that would be adopted should the United States go to such a system . However , if it were decided to have an early publication which ...
... decision has yet been made regarding the nature of the early patent application publication system that would be adopted should the United States go to such a system . However , if it were decided to have an early publication which ...
Page 35
... decision by the Patent and Trademark Office or a Federal court already dealt with the issue ) , ( 2 ) may be inconsistent with other Office decisions , Office practice , and positions currently being taken by the Office before Federal ...
... decision by the Patent and Trademark Office or a Federal court already dealt with the issue ) , ( 2 ) may be inconsistent with other Office decisions , Office practice , and positions currently being taken by the Office before Federal ...
Page 40
... Decision Paper $ 811 million $ 827 million $ 983 million $ 972 million 1992 July PTO Base line $ 1,037 million $ 1,043 million $ 968 million $ 1,056 million $ 972 million $ 1,037 million In its June 1992 report to the Subcommittee , the ...
... Decision Paper $ 811 million $ 827 million $ 983 million $ 972 million 1992 July PTO Base line $ 1,037 million $ 1,043 million $ 968 million $ 1,056 million $ 972 million $ 1,037 million In its June 1992 report to the Subcommittee , the ...
Page 50
... decision on the merits of the patent examiner's rejections . The EIC may have remanded the case to consider matters not previously raised before the patent examiner during prosecution prior to the appeal . Automation Master Plan ( AMP ) ...
... decision on the merits of the patent examiner's rejections . The EIC may have remanded the case to consider matters not previously raised before the patent examiner during prosecution prior to the appeal . Automation Master Plan ( AMP ) ...
Page 68
... decisions . So to the extent there may be specific cases arising out of exam- iners ' actions that he believes have ... decision . Senator DECONCINI . Is there any effort to get around an appeal by appointing a special panel ? Mr. COMER ...
... decisions . So to the extent there may be specific cases arising out of exam- iners ' actions that he believes have ... decision . Senator DECONCINI . Is there any effort to get around an appeal by appointing a special panel ? Mr. COMER ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
Administration advisory committee agency AIPLA American Intellectual Property Appeals and Interferences application management system Assistant Commissioner Automated Patent System benefit Board of Patent budget CD-ROM classified COMER Commissioner of Patents Congress cost Crystal database decision Dennis DeConcini Department of Commerce deployment dissemination documents effective electronic employees evaluation Examiners-in-Chief Federal fiscal foreign patent funding government corporation implementation improve increase independent Intellectual Property Law issues Jerry Shaw million opinion paper files Patent and Trademark patent applications patent information Patent Office patent operation patented product performance appraisal private sector Property Law Association PTO management PTO operations PTO's Question quota recommendations request requirements Senator DECONCINI statutory Strongly Agree Subcommittee Taft Commission text search trademark examining trademark laws Trademark Office trademark operation U.S. patents user fees USPTO Valid responses Vice Chairman workstations
Fréquemment cités
Page 24 - Federal funds shall not participate, directly or indirectly, in payment for any premium or royalty on any patented or proprietary material, specification, or process, specifically set forth in the plans and specifications for a project, unless (1) Such patented or proprietary item is purchased or obtained through competitive bidding with equally suitable...
Page 361 - That the Congress chose to call it a corporation does not alter its characteristics so as to make it something other than what it actually is, an agency selected by government to accomplish purely governmental purposes
Page 252 - Board consisting of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of War, and the Attorney General. The Board members have the power to issue a patent, "if they shall deem the invention or discovery sufficiently useful and important," for a period not to exceed 14 years.
Page 361 - ... enterprises. President Truman prescribed the criteria for the use of government corporations in his 1948 budget message when he stated: Experience indicates that the corporate form of organization is peculiarly adapted to the administration of government programs which are predominantly of a commercial character — those which are revenue producing, are at least potentially self-sustaining, and involve a large number of business-type transactions with the public.
Page 257 - Office, and all that pertains to the same, be, and the same hereby is, transferred from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Commerce and Labor...
Page 16 - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office ASSISTANT SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS Washington, DC 80231 3 1 OCT 1989 Honorable Robert W.
Page 62 - A research physicist at the National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute of Standards and Technology) from 1951-1969, he was its director from 1 969- 1 972.
Page 24 - State highway department certifies either that such patented or proprietary item is essential for synchronization with existing highway facilities, or that no equally suitable alternate exists; or (3) Such patented or proprietary item is used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes.
Page 368 - National Academy of Public Administration, Revitalizing Federal Management: Managers and Their Overburdened Systems (Washington: National Academy of Public Administration, 1983).
Page 102 - Claims; (4) of an appeal from a decision of— (A) the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the Patent and Trademark Office with respect to patent applications and interferences, at the instance of an applicant for a patent or any party to a patent interference, and any such appeal shall waive the right of such applicant or party to proceed under section 145 or 146 of title 35...