Energy and Water Development Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1987: Hearings Before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second SessionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 100
Page 4
... Cost sharing and user fees will uphold the great work done by the subcommittee in the past , and allow it to con- tinue even under ever increasing budgetary pressure . FISCAL YEAR 1985 NEW CONSTRUCTION STARTS An important milestone , Mr ...
... Cost sharing and user fees will uphold the great work done by the subcommittee in the past , and allow it to con- tinue even under ever increasing budgetary pressure . FISCAL YEAR 1985 NEW CONSTRUCTION STARTS An important milestone , Mr ...
Page 7
... cost of implementation , and that skilled resource manage- ment gives us gains other than the planned vendible outputs . FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROGRAM This administration shares in the Corps ' pride and sense of mission . I believe that the ...
... cost of implementation , and that skilled resource manage- ment gives us gains other than the planned vendible outputs . FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROGRAM This administration shares in the Corps ' pride and sense of mission . I believe that the ...
Page 11
... costs . This principle of benefit - based financing is embodied in the 19 new construction starts proposed for FY 1987 with a total project cost of about $ 716 million , 37 percent of which will be funded by non - Federal sponsors . The ...
... costs . This principle of benefit - based financing is embodied in the 19 new construction starts proposed for FY 1987 with a total project cost of about $ 716 million , 37 percent of which will be funded by non - Federal sponsors . The ...
Page 14
... cost sharing and financing agreement with project sponsors . We are making it clear to local sponsors that legislation ultimately will determine the cost sharing formulas . Pending final agreement between Congress and the President , cost ...
... cost sharing and financing agreement with project sponsors . We are making it clear to local sponsors that legislation ultimately will determine the cost sharing formulas . Pending final agreement between Congress and the President , cost ...
Page 15
... cost sharing and financing during construction will necessitate changes in the way sponsors approach water resources development . Accordingly , we have turned to the Interstate Confer- ence on Water Problems , ICWP , the national ...
... cost sharing and financing during construction will necessitate changes in the way sponsors approach water resources development . Accordingly , we have turned to the Interstate Confer- ence on Water Problems , ICWP , the national ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
1987 budget request activities additional Administration agencies agreement analysis Answer applications appropriation assessment budget authority Chairman HATFIELD Commission completed Congress construction continue contract cooperative Corps cost sharing Creek DAWSON efforts electric engineering environmental estimated evaluation facilities Federal fees FERC Fermilab fiscal year 1987 flood control fuel funding fusion FY 1987 budget HARBOR hydropower impact implementation improved increase industry initiated issues Laboratory legislation licensing maintenance million National natural gas non-Federal nuclear power Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office operation percent plant PLASMA PHYSICS Power Marketing Administrations priority problems proposed Question reactor Reclamation reduced regulation regulatory renewable energy research and development research program response result River Basin safety schedule Secretary solar specific storage studies SUB-TOTAL technical Tennessee Valley Authority testing Tevatron thermal-hydraulic TVA's utilities Waddell Dam waste
Fréquemment cités
Page 571 - It is the sense of the Congress that any work, service, publication, report, document, benefit, privilege, authority, use, franchise, license, permit, certificate, registration, or similar thing of value or utility performed, furnished, provided, granted, prepared, or issued...
Page 956 - A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on January 29, 1986. The proposed Criteria modification addresses: (1) items that were questioned in the miners...
Page 572 - Where a service (or privilege) provides special benefits to an identifiable recipient above and beyond those which accrue to the public at large, a charge should be imposed to recover the full cost to the Federal Government of rendering that service.
Page 964 - The purposes of this part are— (1) to establish a schedule for the siting, construction, and operation of repositories that will provide a reasonable assurance that the public and the environment will be adequately protected from the hazards posed by high-level radioactive waste and such spent nuclear fuel as may be disposed of in a repository...
Page 927 - RTG development, DOE is continuing its efforts to improve thermoelectric conversion efficiencies, including silicon germanium optimization, electrical contacting, evaluation of materials properties, degradation mechanisms, and material interactions.
Page 571 - ... taking into consideration direct and indirect cost to the Government, value to the recipient, public policy or interest served, and other pertinent facts.
Page 572 - ... (c) Is performed at the request of the recipient and is above and beyond the services regularly received by other members of the same industry or group, or of the general public (eg, receiving a passport, visa, airman's certificate, or an inspection after regular duty hours).
Page 739 - A part of the recent progress in high energy physics has been the conceptual unification of the weak nuclear and electromagnetic forces into a single "electroweak
Page 782 - BER program is $196.6 million. Within this request, $184.6 million is for Operating Expenses; $8.5 million is for Capital Equipment, and $3.5 million is for Construction (Table 9).
Page 197 - Law 91-575) among the States of Maryland and New York, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Federal Government. The purpose of the Compact is to enable the signatory parties to participate jointly in the conservation, utilization, development, and control of water and related resources in the region of the Susquehanna River Basin.