the habits of his living existence. Brougham and Sugden will be mummyfied in the guise of the lion laying a paw on the mouse; Buccleuch as a mammoth moth; Long Wellesley as a flying fish. Peel will be represented in the act of a deprecating bow; Newcastle characterized as holding in his hand a loaf made of stone; and his Royal Highness of Kew, as being asked for a fish and rendering a serpent. Names on the pedestals, or labels on the glass cases must be rendered superfluous. Contemporary mummies should be formed into tableaux; and the Bar of every separate Court, in every succeeding age, perpetuated as in process of a suit; Kings and their Courts mummyfied in characteristic groups; and the literary and political worlds in discordant congregation. For our own parts, we look forward with cheerful confidence to a poetical corner in the Cheopsian edifice, in the midst of a little group of oddlooking fishes, reverenced by after ages as the defunct contributors toTAIT'S MAGAZINE. THE VISION OF SIR ROBERT. "Unus Pello Juveni non sufficit orbis. JUVENAL. GONE is the night. . But still her sable pall Pale glow-worm lamps shine dim athwart the gloom Now Somnus opens wide his ivory door, The papered ringlets on the brows of Law How, on Vane's ear, all Plunket's thunders swell Some other strain-some happier hour may tell. Duke Smithson swelters, and Duke Slaughter moans. Slow passed the hours. Our sleepless hero tossed Despairing hummed a tune-essayed to speak- Fair is the chamber. Gems of every dye- In studied litter, quaintly strewed around, Coats, where sartorial Stultze had laboured long, Behold that toilet. O'er its broad expanse Hence vulgar calico! Thou tradesman's son, Say dost thou scorn the stuff thy father spun? Gold-looped, gold-fringed, thy velvet curtain falls. Presumptuous Gobelins veils thy princely walls. For thee rich lamps their tempered light diffuse On floors that glow with Persia's hundred hues! Embossed on gewgaws, and engraved on seals, Blaze out the bought achievements of the Peels: Three arrowy sheaves, with lackered fillets bound— One volant wasp; upon an azure ground, A gilded lion ramped, with gaping jaws, Behold the Church, with all her idle state, The ox is fattening in Cathedral stalls, And Pidcock's beasts are quartered in St. Pauls. And now our statesmen's dreams retrace the time Guy Faux returns-King James revives again...... The mitred Saints eschew their champion now. A brimstone blast-and it has vanished too. With Masham's dame, to gull the drivelling Anne. To prove how kings by heavenly mandates reign- What means that scaffold-the surrounding crowd Say, why to heaven those vengeful murmurs rise? Thus dreams on dreams in quick succession rise- 'Tis time to close our laudatory song. "Farewell a while! We will not leave thee long." THE DEATH-BEDS OF KINGS. THE singular multiplication of revolutions which has occurred within the last two years throughout the kingdoms and dukedoms of Europe, as if reflecting, on a thousand shattered fragments of the vast mirror of politics, the great event of the Three Days, has engendered a new order of beings in the civilized world. Instead of knights-errant, as depicted by Ariosto or Cervantes, we have now sovereigns-errant, as at present undepicted; and it is to be inferred, that prince-errantry, or kingerrantry, will shortly assume a specific meaning among our philological definitions. Now, could there possibly exist such a personage as a dethroned or abdicated sovereign, capable of both learning and forgetting -of acquiring wisdom (like other fools, his fellow creatures) from experience, and renouncing all reminiscence of former greatness, we should conceive him to be the most edifying and enlightened companion in the world. In his regal capacity, he must have beheld the surface of society bright with that unnatural gloss, necessitated by "The ceremony that to great ones 'longs ;" while, in his human, he must have seen the mask stripped off; must have tasted those "apples of the Dead Sea's shore, all ashes to the taste," that shone so brightly on their stalks in the day of his exaltation; and have torn away the sheep's clothing from innumerable rapacious breasts, convicting them that" inwardly they were ravening wolves." Unfortunately, historical experience leaves us no trace of such a man. The same weakness or wilfulness which hurled the monarch from his throne, or urged him, in a fit of waywardness, to fling away his crown and sceptre, (exchanging them, probably, for other baubles, the cowl and rosary,)" seals up his eyes as close as oak" against all lessons of worldly or divine wisdom, and his ears against the voice of the charmer. Charles V., digging in his garden at the monastery of St. Justus, or Christina astonishing the gardes de chasse of Versailles by the excellence of her sportswomanship, were but the same crack-brained egotists who gave audience to foreign envoys on the thrones of Spain or Sweden; and, among the various potentates made and marred during the last thirty years, we have never heard of, nor seen one, who seemed inclined to profit by the harsh schooling of adversity. It is the impulse of most human beings, on reviewing their mortal career, to exclaim, like Joanna Baillie's hero ""Tiз done-'tis numbered with the things o'erpast; Would would it were to come! that I might prove myself a wiser and a better man." But never yet was a king, living in dethronement and exile, who did not burn to be again upon the judgment seat, that he might uphold his former measures by fiercer tyranny and better organized despotism-that he might, in short, draw yet closer the iron chain of human bondage. Nay, "though one rose from the dead," we are persuaded that they would scorn to amend their ignorance. In point of fact, an apparition from the grave is constantly before them. History is a mighty conjuror of phantoms; or rather a dauntless resurrectionist, ever busy with pick-axe and shovel, revealing the secrets of the prison-house, and betraying the mysteries of the worm and the shroud. Yet, in spite of every loathsome lesson, they persist in believing themselves immortal, and fancying that the monstrous farce of the bended knee, the mouth honour, and passive obedience of courtiership, awaits them beyond the grave. Like the " poor Indian, whose untutored mind" conceives that his favourite dog will attend him in his hunting grounds in the sky, they expire, in the belief that the "O king, live for ever!" with which they have so long been saluted, is not a mere form of oriental courtesy ; but that, when the trumpet shall sound, human majesty will become divinely majestic, and mortal sovereignty become engirded with an immortal crown. Let them, for a moment, contemplate the lesson afforded by the dying bed and funeral ceremonies of the three most luxurious princes of modern times. "The king's body," says Bishop Burnet, (after adverting to the death of Charles II., and the strong suspicion of poison which arose during the process of embalming,) "the king's body was indecently neglected. Some parts of his inwards, and some pieces of the fat, were left in the water in which they were washed; all which were so carelessly looked after, that the water being poured out at a scullery hole that went to a drain, in the mouth of which a grate lay, these were seen lying on the grate many days afterwards. His funeral was very mean; no mournings were given; and the expense of it was not equal to what an ordinary nobleman's funeral gave rise to." "The king," says St. Simon, in his Memoirs, speaking of the decease of Louis XIV., "was almost abandoned at the moment of his death. Madame de Maintenon, to whom he had made so many sacrifices, quitted him for St. Cyr four days before; and the dying monarch was repeatedly heard to inquire for her, and deplore her absence; nor was his confessor, Le Tellier, to be found when his presence was required by the king. His son, by Madame de Montespan, the Duc du Maine, was so little |