Federal Housing Administration's Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, May 8, 1991, Volume 4

Couverture

À l'intérieur du livre

Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire

Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.

Autres éditions - Tout afficher

Expressions et termes fréquents

Fréquemment cités

Page 1 - COMMITTEE ON BANKING, FINANCE, AND URBAN AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 2 pm, in room 2128, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon.
Page 18 - I think that what is good for the goose is good for the gander...
Page 19 - This group includes the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Bureau of the Budget, and the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.
Page 46 - Thank you, again, for holding this hearing and I look forward to the testimony.
Page 49 - I would first like to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and the other members of this committee, for giving me this opportunity to appear before you.
Page 38 - Mr. OXLEY. Thank you, and thank the gentleman for his incisive questions. He does raise some excellent points. The gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. MARKEY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to thank you for holding this hearing today. I think it is very important. As I previously indicated, Glass-Steagall reform is truly a Sisyphean endeavor in which the prospect for successful enactment of a bill into law remains somewhat remote, given the competing and conflicting interests and objectives involved....
Page 7 - I also want to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and the other Members of this Subcommittee for the bipartisan support you have given OJP in working toward this mission.
Page 74 - OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION SEPTEMBER 30.
Page 77 - FHA's large number of claims during tha 1980s. This finding is consistent with every serious study of mortgage defaults. The 57 percent limit on closing costs increases homeowner equity. Without the 57 percent limit, the National Affordable Housing Act's loan-to-value caps alone would result in additional defaults on each year's business, which would jeopardize the achievement of the statutory capital targets.
Page 77 - National Affordable Housing Act. In a letter dated March 7, 1991 to Chairman Gonzalez, Secretary Kemp made this point clear. All the conference discussions concerning FHA were based upon the Price Waterhouse analysis of the Fund.

Informations bibliographiques