« VorigeDoorgaan »
back into England, that " under pretence of privacy, and retirement, he might take occasion of giying notice of the posture of things in this nation."
Soon after his return to London, he was seized by some messengers of the usurping powers, who were sent out in quest of another man; and, being examined, was put into confinement, from which he was not dismissed without the security of a thousand pounds given by Dr. Scarborough.
This year he published his poems, with a pre. face, in which he seems to have inserted something, suppressed in subsequent editions, which was in. terpreted to denote some relaxation of his loyalty. In this preface he declares, that “his desire had been for some days past, and did still very vehe mently continue, to retire himself to some of the American plantations, and to forsake this world for ever.”
From the obliquy which the appearance of submission to the usurpers brought upon him, his biographer has been very diligent to clear him; and indeed it does not seem to have lessened his reputation. His wish for retirement we can easily believe to be undissembled; a man harassed in ons kingdom, and persecuted in another, who, after a course of business that employed all his days and half bis nights, in cyphering and decyphering, comes to his own country, and steps into a prison, will be willing enough to retire to some place of quiet and of safety. Yet let neither our reverence for a genius, nor our pity for a sufferer, dispose us to torget that, if his activity was virtue, his retreat was cowardice. : He then look upon himself the character of phy,
books; and says, that it was used by the pagans, the Jewish Rabbins, and even the early Christians ; the latter taking the New Testament for their oracle.-H.
sician, still, according to Sprat, with intention " to dissemble the main design of his coming over;" and, as Mr. Wood relates, “complying with the men then in power (which was much taken notice of by the royal party,) he obtained an order to be created doctor of physic; which being done to his mind (whereby he gained the ill-will of some of his friends) he went into France again, having made a copy of verses on Oliver's death."
This is no favourable representation, yet even in this not much wrong can be discovered. How far he complied with the men in power, is to be inquired before he can be blamed. It is not said that he told them any secrets, or assisted them by intelligence or any other act. If he only promised to be quiet, that they in whose hands he was, might free him from confinement, he did what no law of society prohibits.
The man whose miscarriage in a just cause has put him in the power of his enemy may, without any violation of his integrity, regain his liberty, or preserve his life, by a promise of neutrality : for, the stipulation gives the enemy nothing which he had not before; the neutrality of a captive mag be always secured by his imprisonment or death. He that is at the disposal of another may not pro mise to aid him in any injurious act, because no power can compel active obedience. He may en. gage to do nothing, but not to do ill.
There is reason to think that Cowley promised little. It does not appear that his compliance gain. ed him confidence enough to be trusted without se curity, for the bond of his bail was never cancelled: nor that it made him think himself.secure; for at that dissolution of government which followed the death of Oliver, he returned into France, where he resumed his former station, and staid till the Res. toration,
“He continued,” says his biographer, “under these bonds till the general deliverance ;" it is
therefore to be supposed, that he did not go to France, and act again for the King, without the consent of his bondsman; that he did not shew his loyalty at the hazard of his friend, but by his friend's permission.
Of the verses on Oliver's death, in which Wood's narrative seems to imply something encomiastic, there has been no appearance. There is a dis course concerning his government, indeed, with verses intermixed, but such as certainly gained its author no friends among the abettors of usurpation.
A doctor of physic however he was made at Oxford in December, 1657; and in the commencement of the Royal Society, of which an account has been given by Dr. Birch, he appears busy among the experimental philosophers with the title of Dr. Cowley.
There is no reason for supposing that he ever at tempted practice; but his preparatory studies have contributed something to the honour of his country. Considering botany as necessary to a physician, he retired into Kent to gather plants; and as the predominance of a favourite study affects all subordinate operations of the intellect, botany in the mind of Cowley turned into poetry. He composed in Latin several books on plants, of which the first and second display the qualities of herbs, in elegiac verse; the third and fourth, the beauties of flowers in various measures; and the fifth and sixth, the uses of trees, in heroic numbers.
At the same time were produced, from the same university, the two great poets, Cowley and Milton, of dissimilar genius, of opposite principles; but concurring in the cultivation of Latin poetry, in which the English, till their works and May's poem appeared,* seemed unable to contest the palm with any other of the lettered nations.
• By May's poem we are here to understand a
If the Latin performances of Cowley and Milton be compared (for May I hold to be superior to both), the advantage seems to lie on the side of Cowley. Milton is generally content to express the thoughts of the ancients in their language; Cowley, without much loss of purity or elegance, accommodates the diction of Rome to his own conceptions.
At the Restoration, after all the diligence of his long service, and with consciousness not only of the merit of fidelity, but of the dignity of great abilities, he naturally expected ample preferments; and, that he might not be forgotten by his own fault, wrote a Song of Triumph. " But this was a . time of such general hope, that great numbers were inevitably disappointed; and Cowley found his re. ward very tediously delayed. He had been promised by both Charles the First and Second, the mastership of the Savoy ; “but he lost it,” says Wood,“ by certain persons, enemies to the muses,"
The neglect of the court was not his only morti fication; having, by such alteration as he thought proper, fitted his old comedy of “The Guardian" for the stage, he produced it* under the title of “The Cutter of Coleman-street." + It was treated
continuation of Lucan's Pharsalia to the death of Julius Cæsar, by Thomas May, an eminent poet and historian, who flourished in the reigns of James and Charles I. and of whom a life is given in the Biographia Britannica.-H.
+ Here is an error in the designation of this comedy, which our author copied from the title page of the latter editions of Cowley's Works: the title of the play itself is without the article, “Cutter of Coleman-street,” and that because a merry shark. ing fellow about the town, named Cutter, is a prine cipal character in it.-H.
on the stage with great severity, and was afterward censured as a satire on the King's party.
Mr. Dryden, who went with Mr. Sprat to the first exhibition, related to Mr. Dennis, “That, when they told Cowley how little favour had been shewn him, he received the news of his ill-success, not with so much firmness as might have been expected from so great a man."
What firmness they expected, or what weakness Cowley discovered, cannot be known. , He that misses his end will never be as much pleased as he that attains it, even when he can impute no part of his failure to himself; and, when the end is to please the multitude, no man, perhaps, has a right, in things admitting of gradation and comparison, to throw the whole blame upon his judges, and totally to exclude diffidence and shame by a haughty consciousness of his own excellence.
For the rejection of this play it is difficult now to find the reason; it certainly has, in a very great degree, the power of fixing attention and exciting merriment. From the charge of dişaffection le exculpates himself in his preface, by observing how uplikely it is that, having followed the royal family through all their distresses," he should chuse the time of their restoration to begin a quarrel with them.”
It appears, however, from the Theatrical Register of Downes, the prompter, to have been popularly considered as a satire on the roy·alists.
That he might shorten this tedious suspense, he published his pretensions and his discontent, in an ode called “The Complaint ;” in which he styles himself the melancholy Cowley. This met with the usual fortune of complaints, and seems to have ex. cited more contempt than pity.
These unlucky incidents are brought, maliciously enough, together in some stanzas, written about that time, on the choice of a laureat; a mode of są. tire, by which, since it was first introduced by