Strategic Force Modernization Programs: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Strategic and Theater Nuclear Forces of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, First Session, October 26, 27, 28, 29, 30; November 3, 4, 10, 12, 13, 1981U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981 - 457 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 100
Page 2
... President's decision , coming as it did after the beginning of the new fiscal year , has placed a great burden upon the Congress to consider this program expeditiously . I have before me a very lengthy set of hearings . We will not be ...
... President's decision , coming as it did after the beginning of the new fiscal year , has placed a great burden upon the Congress to consider this program expeditiously . I have before me a very lengthy set of hearings . We will not be ...
Page 11
... President's decision , coming as it did after the beginning of the new fiscal year , has placed a great burden upon the Congress to consider this program expeditiously . I have before me a very lengthy set of hearings . We will not be ...
... President's decision , coming as it did after the beginning of the new fiscal year , has placed a great burden upon the Congress to consider this program expeditiously . I have before me a very lengthy set of hearings . We will not be ...
Page 27
... President's submission of his plan for the moderniza- tion of America's strategic nuclear forces . He described a five - part package which addressed each leg of the strategic Triad , civil and air defense , and the command , control ...
... President's submission of his plan for the moderniza- tion of America's strategic nuclear forces . He described a five - part package which addressed each leg of the strategic Triad , civil and air defense , and the command , control ...
Page 28
... President's strategic package is more con- troversial than his proposals for basing the new MX missile . The President has rejected , to the surprise of many , the multiple protec- tive structure basing concept endorsed by the two ...
... President's strategic package is more con- troversial than his proposals for basing the new MX missile . The President has rejected , to the surprise of many , the multiple protec- tive structure basing concept endorsed by the two ...
Page 29
... President has submitted to the Congress a rather com- prehensive strategic modernization package and it is now up to us , and especially to the members of this subcommittee , to work toward improving America's strategic nuclear forces ...
... President has submitted to the Congress a rather com- prehensive strategic modernization package and it is now up to us , and especially to the members of this subcommittee , to work toward improving America's strategic nuclear forces ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
accuracy Admiral BURKHALTER Admiral KELSO Admiral NAGLER Admiral WILLIAMS air defense Air Force aircraft airplane ALCM ALLEN answer assistant to Senator attack basing mode billion bomber BORSTING budget BURKE capability Chairman closed session committee cost cruise missile DAVIS deceptive basing decision DELAUER deleted deployed deployment deterrent dollars ELLIS enduring estimate fiscal year 1982 funding hard target hardening ICBM ICBM's IKLE improvements interim LATHAM launch military Minuteman MX missile Navy open session operational option PAVE PAWS penetrate Poseidon President President's problem question radar radar cross section Reagan SALT II Secretary of Defense Senator CANNON Senator EXON Senator JACKSON Senator LEVIN Senator NUNN Senator QUAYLE Senator WARNER silos SLBM Soviet Union SSBNs Stealth strategic forces strategic program survivability TACAMO talking tegic Titan Titan II Triad Trident II vulnerability WADE warheads weapon systems
Fréquemment cités
Page 149 - Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee. It is my privilege to appear before you today to...
Page 145 - Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, it is my privilege to appear before you...
Page 159 - I have repeatedly received assurances from the Department of Defense, confirmed by the White House, that Seafarer would not be built In Michigan if I object Mr. Secretary, I object. I object on several grounds, Including those relating to the conditions I set Including my request of veto, at the time of the Navy's Initial consideration of a Michigan site : 1.
Page 103 - I have submitted a written statement for the record, and with your permission, I would like to briefly summarize it.
Page 159 - ... the Department of Defense and the Congress in such matters. You have my every assurance that a Department of Defense decision to add Michigan as a final candidate site along with those in Nevada and New Mexico would be made only with your concurrence. In short, I can confirm, as you requested in your December 12 letter, that I would not recommend a Michigan site to Congress if you object. The installation and operation of a project of this magnitude would not be possible without the support of...
Page 276 - Center supports a strong defense, but opposes excesses and waste in military spending, and programs that increase the danger of nuclear war. CDI believes that strong social, economic, and political structures contribute equally to national security and are essential to the strength of our country.
Page 69 - While we are reviewing our SALT policy, we will take no action that would undercut existing agreements so long as the Soviet Union exercises the same restraint.
Page 159 - You have my every assurance that a Department of Defense decision to add Michigan as a final candidate site along with those in Nevada and New Mexico would be made only with your concurrence. Shortly after President Carter took office, his Administration acknowledged and reaffirmed the commitment of the previous Administration giving Governor Milliken a "veto" authority with respect to Seafarer.
Page 159 - ... to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces", and "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers. ..." On the other hand, the Constitution provides that "the executive power shall be vested in a President," that he "shall be Commander-in-Chief of the army and navy of the United States...
Page 277 - I'm not one that believes it is either right objectively or sound policy to inflate our concerns about our own weakness. ... In a contemporary sense, the United States is very, very strong and very, very capable, especially in the strategic area. Our systems are both more sophisticated and reliable and more technologically sound.