NEW PUBLICATIONS IN THEOLOGY AND GENERAL LITERATURE. The Glory of Regality: an Historical Treatise of the Anointing and Crowning of the Kings and Queens of England. By Arthur Taylor, F. A. S. 8vo. 14s. (Engravings.) The History of the Crusades for the Recovery and Possession of the Holy Land. By Charles Mills, Esq. 2 vols. £1. 48. The Touchstone of Reputed Evangelical Doctrine; or, The Gospel GladTidings from God to Men. By Richard Wright, U. M. 12mo. 3d. Address to those who may be disposed to remove to the United States of America. By George Courtauld. 8vo. A Letter of Remonstrance to Robert Gifford, Knight, His Majesty's Attorney General. 8vo. 2s. 6d. Socinians not Unitarians; or, The Scripture Doctrine of the Name of Christ. 2d. Proceedings in the House of Commons and in the Court of King's Bench, relative to the Author of the Trifling Mistake; together with the Argument against Parliamentary Commitment, and the Decision which the Judges gave without hearing the Case. Prepared for the Press by John C. Hobhouse, Esq. F. R. S. 48. 6d. A Reply to the Rev. Mr. Todd's Vindication of our authorized Translation and Translators of the Bible. By Sir James Bland Burges, Bart. 28. Christian and Civic Economy of Large Towns. By Thomas Chalmers, D. D. Nos. 1. and II. 1s. each. An Attempt to shew that the Education of the Jews will prove beneficial to the Propagation of the Gospel, and be the leading Means of their Restoration. By J. Nicholson, A. M. 8vo. 18. 6d. A Key to the Chronology of the Hindus, in a Series of Letters, in which an Attempt is made to facilitate the Progress of Christianity in Hindostan, by proving that the protracted Numbers of all Oriental Nations, when reduced, agree with the Dates in the Hebrew Text of the Bible. 2 vols. 8vo. 18s. Remarks upon a late Publication by Mr. Belsham, entitled "The Bampton Lecturer Reproved," in a Letter to a Friend. By H. W. Carter, M. D. F. R. S. One of Dr. Radcliffe's Travelling Fellows from the University of Oxford. Song to David. By the late Christopher Smart, A. M. New Ed. 12mo. Sermons. A Second Volume on the most important Duties of the Christian Religion. By J. A. Busfield, D. D. 8vo. 12s. A Second Volume on Various Subjects and Occasions. By G. S. Faber, B. D. Rector of Long Newton. 8vo. 12s. Lectures on Scripture Doctrines. By W. B. Collyer, D. D. F. A. S. &c. 8vo. 14s. Lectures upon the Book of Genesis, delivered in the Chapel of the British Minister at Berlin, in the year 1818. By H. T. Austen, A. M. late Chaplain to the Embassy. 8vo. 68. Single. Religion the Basis of Loyalty, preached on the Anniversary of the Martyrdom of King Charles I. at Sandwich. By W. Wodsworth. 1s. 6d. The Influence of the Gospel in the Anticipation of Death; preached before the Association of Ministers and Churches, at Salters' Hall, Jan. 6, 1820: To which is added, a Brief Memoir of the Succession of Ministers in the Salters' Hall Congregation. By Robert Winter, D.D. 28. The Necessity and Advantages of an Habitual Intercourse with the Deity. By G. H. Law, Bishop of Chester. 8vo. 1s. 6d. Defences of Revealed Religion. The Truth and the Excellence of the Christian Religion, and the Christian Blessings and Duties of the Poor, in Three Discourses, preached in the Parish Church of St. Botolph, Bishopsgate. By R. Mant, D. D. Rector. 9d. or 8s. a dozen. Passing Events Correspondent with Ancient Prophecies; a Sermon preached in the Parish Church of Ashford, in Kent. By John Nance, D. D. 1s. 6d. The Christian Champion, No. I. 8vo. 4d. (To be continued weekly.) Three Sermons on Infidelity. By S. Butler, D. D. F. S. A. Head Master of Shrewsbury School. 2s. 6d. Cheap edition, ls. 6d., or 15s. per dozen, or twentyfive for 28s. A Letter from a Father to a Son on the Principles and Evidences of the Christian Faith. By a Layman. 2s. The Principles of True Christianity vindicated, in an Address to Deists and Nominal Christians. By William Grimshaw, who formerly professed Deism. 6d. A Catechism of the Evidences of Christianity for Schools. 6d. or 5s. per dozen. On the Royal Deaths. Relics of Royalty; or, Remarks, Anecdotes, Amusements and Conversations, of His late Majesty. By Joseph Taylor. 38. Original Anecdotes of the last few years of his late Majesty George the Third; by an Inhabitant of Windsor. 12mo. 18. Anecdotes of George III. with Poetical Effusions. 1s. 6d. Monody on His late R. H. the Duke of Kent. By Miss M. S. Croker. 18. Memoir of His late Majesty and the Duke of Kent, as a Companion to Memoirs of the Queen and the Princess Charlotte. By T. Williams. Memoirs of His late Majesty. By John Brown, Esq., Author of the Northern Courts, &c. A Monody on the Death of H. L. M. E. Majesty George III. with Emblematical Vignettes. By James Bissett, Esq. The Public and Private Life of King George III. By Robert Huish, Esq. In 10 Parts, at 3s. each. 4to. The Patriarch's Grave: a Poem to the Memory of H. L. Majesty. By B. Read. 18. Sermons. The Character of George III., and the Character of his Reign, considered separately. Preached at the Octagon Chapel, Norwich. To which is annexed, the Conclusion of a Discourse on the Death of the Princess Charlotte. By Thomas Madge. 8vo. 18. 6d. By H. J. Knapp, A. M., Curate of St. Andrew, Undershaft, London. 18. 6d. By J. R. Pitman, Alternate Evening Preacher at the Foundling and Magdalen Hospitals. Preached before the University of Cambridge, in Great St. Mary's Church, February 16. By John Kaye, D. D., Master of Christ's College, and Regius Professor of Divinity. 4to. 1s. 6d. Delivered in the Chapel, High Street, Windsor, containing Authentic and Original Anecdotes. By A. Redford. 1s. 6d. Patriotic Regrets for the Loss of a Good King; at Trevor Chapel, Brompton. By John Morrison. At the Meeting House in Little Wild Street. By J. Edwards. Britain's Divine Monitor, at the Meeting House, St. Neot's. By T. Morell. 18. 6d. Britain's Song: preached Feb. 6, in York-Street Chapel, Dublin. By Thomas Gilbart. 1s. 6d. National Affliction improved: Three Sermons delivered in the years 1817, 1819, and 1820, on the Royal Deaths. By T. T. Biddulph, A. M., Minister of St. James's, Bristol. 2s. 6d. At St. Stephen's Church, Salford. By N. Gilbert, A. M. M. G. S. 18. By S. Crowther, Vicar of Christ Church, London. National Sympathy, at the Chapel, in Keppel Street, Bedford Square. By George Pritchard. 18. The Retrospect: at the Meeting House, Eagle Street: with Notes. By Joseph Ivimey. The Lamentation of David over Saul and Jonathan: at Ebenezer Chapel, Margate. By George Atkinson. Is. At the Meeting House in Dean Street, Southwark. With an Appendix. By J. M. Cramp. 18. On the Demise of King George III., and the Accession of George IV. at Carter Lane, Southwark. With Supplementary Papers. By John Rippon, D. D. The Voice of Royal Bereavements: at Battersea. 18. 6d. By Joseph Hughes, A. M. The Duties of Christians towards Civil Rulers at the Old Meeting, Norwich; on the Accession of George IV. By William Hull. 1s. 6d. Prayer for the King the Duty and Interest of the People; at Trinity Church, Cambridge. By C. Simeon. Two Sermons at the Episcopal Jews' Chapel, Bethnal Green. By C. S. Hawtrey, M. A. 25. The Retrospect: at New Court, Cary Street. By Robert Winter, D. D. 18. 6d. By John Reynolds, of Romsey, Hants, 18. 6d. A Voice from the Royal Sepulchre: at Thames Ditton. By J. Churchill. Reflections on the Termination of the late Reign and the Commencement of the Present: at Bishop Stortford. By W. Chaplin. 18. By G. Burder. 1s. At the Foundling Hospital. By John Hewlett, B. D. 2s. At Union Chapel, Islington. By T. Lewis. At the Tabernacle. By J. Hyatt. In the Parish Church of Fifehead Magdalen, Dorset. By E. Peacock, Vicar. 18. Britain's Memorial: at the Old Chapel in the Cliff, Lewes. By Joseph Kerby. 1s. REGISTER OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS. Report on the Criminal Laws. [Concluded from p. 124.] Mr. Hobler, clerk to the Lord Mayor, and to the sitting magistrates in London for thirty years, stated the anxiety of prosecutors to lower the value of goods stolen; and has observed many cases of forgery, in which, after the clearest evidence before the magistrate, the grand jury has thrown out the bill for some reason or other, where the magistrate had no doubt. The same solicitude to reduce the value of articles privately stolen in shops and dwelling-houses, has been remarked by Mr. Payne, clerk to the sitting magistrate at Guildhall; by Mr. Yardley, clerk at the office in Worship Street, who has observed a disinclination to prosecute in all capital cases, except murder; and who says, that in larcenies he has often heard prosecutors, especially females, say, "I hope it is not a hanging matter;" and by Mr. Thomson, clerk at the office in Whitechapel, who represents it as common for prosecutors in larcenies to ask, "Cannot this be put under forty shillings?" Mr. Alderman Wood, a member of the House, an active magistrate, and two successive years Lord Mayor of London, has strongly stated the unwillingness of shopkeepers and others to prosecute; the number of offenders who, during his mayoralty, owed their escape to this cause; and his decided conviction, that if the capital punishment was taken away, the reluctance to prosecute would be greatly abated. Mr. Wilkinson, a merchant in London, stated a case of property, to the value of one thousand pounds stolen from him, where he was deterred from prosecution by the capital punishment; and expressed his belief that a similar disposition prerailed among persons of the like condition and occupation with himself. Mr. Josiah Conder, bookseller, Mr. Joseph Curtis, currier, Mr. Wendover Fry, type-founder, and Mr. John Gaun, a merchant and shoe manufacturer, stated instances in which they were prevented by the capital punishment from prosecating offenders, whom they would have brought to justice if the punishment had in their opinion been more proportioned to the crime. They also declared, that there is a general disinclination to prosecute among the traders of the city of London, or to convict in thefts without violence, and in forgeries. Sir Richard Phillips, a bookseller in London, and once Sheriff, as well as often a juror, has in these several capacities observed the same facts. Mr. Richard Taylor, a common-council man, prosecuted some men for breaking into his printing-office and stealing some property out of it, for which they were transported, but whom he would not have prosecuted if he had not previously ascertained that the connexion of the printing-office with the dwelling-house was not such as to make the act a capital offence. Mr. Richard Martin, a Member of the House, informed the Committee, that the punishment of death prevented prosecu tions in Ireland for horse, cattle, and sheep stealing, for privately stealing in dwellinghouses and shops, and in general for all larcenies without violence. Though the extensive estate, of which he is proprietor, be almost laid waste by sheep stealing, he has been prevented from prosecuting by the punishment of death. If the punishment were reduced to transportation, he would certainly prosecute the offenders to conviction. He has no doubt that his estate would be better protected if the law were more lenient; and that the reduction of the penalties of the law would promote the security of property throughout the province of Connaught. Mr. James Soaper, of St. Helen's Place, Mr. Ebenezer Johnston, of Bishopsgatestreet, ironmonger, Mr. Baker, of the Tower, Mr. Lewis, a retired merchant, and Mr. Garrett, an insurance broker, bore testimony to the general repugnance to prosecution which arose from capital punishment; some of them mentioned instances in which they had been deterred by that consideration from bringing offenders to justice. Mr. Garrett said, that as far as his observation, there was not one in twenty who did not shudder at the idea of inflicting the capital punishment in cases of forgery. Messrs. Frederic and William Thornhill, hardwaremen, mentioned cases of theft in which they had forborne to prosecute on account of the punishment of death. The former added, that he found it to be an almost universal sentiment among his neighbours and acquaintance, that excessive punishment tends very greatly to the production of crime; that he knows many persons who have been great sufferers by thefts in shops and dwelling-houses, and who declare that if the punishment of such offences had been any thing less than death, they would have regarded it as highly criminal in themselves to have forborne prosecution, which they had felt themselves compelled to abstain from in every instance on account of the punishment, and must continue to act on the same principle of forbearance till there was an amendment in the law. He also informed the Committee, that from his knowledge of a great variety of cases, he was convinced the more lenient punishment would more effectually prevent forgery. Mr. Collins and Mr. Crowther, considerable and very respectable traders in Westminster, gave evidence which the Committee consider as of peculiar value. Mr. Collins has suffered both from larcenies and forgeries, and was restrained by the state of the penal law from bringing the offenders to justice, which he would otherwise have taken the greatest pains to do. He thinks that the laws of God do not permit life to be taken away for mere offences against property; and that among his friends, many of whom are traders in London and Westminster, he does not know a single exception from concurrence in such sentiments. Mr. Crowther stated, that no porter had left their establishment for twenty years for any other cause than theft; that a prosecution had taken place in one instance, and had terminated in conviction and condemnation. "The pain and anxiety," he adds, " occasioned by that event, until we obtained for him the Royal mercy, none can describe but ourselves; which made us resolve never to prosecute again for a similar offence." The general opinion of the traders in London and Westminster is the same with his own. He declared, that if he received a forged bank note, he should be prevented from prosecution by the punishment of death, and that if the Dunishment were less than death, he should undoubtedly consider it as his absolute duty to bring the offender to justice. He believes that nine tradesmen out of ten agree with him. Mr. Stephen Curtis, a leather-factor in London, stated several cases of forgery, fraudulent bankruptcy and larceny, where the persons injured declined to prosecute, from apprehension that the offenders might suffer death: this is the general opinion of the traders of London, though in the opinion of this witness, scarcely a shopkeeper from Cornhill to Charingcross who does not suffer from shoplifting. Mr. Jacob, who has lately travelled through England on business, and Mr. Jennings, for some time a shopkeeper near Bridgewater, gave some evidence tending to shew that the general sentiments of traders in the country were, on capital punishments, the same which the Committee had such ample reason to consider as the prevalent opinion of the same valuable class of persons in the metropolis. Mr. Jennings observed, that these opinions prevailed among farmers as well as shopkeepers, and that the capital punishment prevented prosecutions for horse, cattle and sheep stealing, as well as for privately stealing in shops and dwelling-houses, and in constructive burglaries. Mr. Joseph Harmer, who has practised for twenty years as a solicitor at the Old Bailey, gave a testimony which the Committee cannot but recommend to the most serious consideration of the House. In the course of his practice he had confidential communication with at least 2,000 capital convicts; and may be presumed to have as good means of understanding their temptations, their fears, and their hopes, as any individual in the kingdom. He is now much employed by prosecutors, and from intercourse with them, as well as by former observation of their conduct, has the amplest means of knowing the influence which capital punishment has on their disposition, to aid and enforce the execution of the laws. The Committee must also add, that he appeared to them a man of sagacity, as well as of a conscientious and humane character, whose opinions on this subject are entitled to much consideration. Every part of his evidence is so important, that they find it difficult to select particular facts as worthy of greater notice. He informed the Committee, that he knew many instances of persons injured by larcenies and forgeries, declining to prosecute on account of the punishment; that the same consideration strongly disinclines many persons to serve as jurors at the Old Bailey, and induces them to bribe the summoning officer not to summon them; and that he has seen juries influenced, as he believes, by the severity of the punishment in numerous capital cases, but especially in forgeries, give verdicts of acquittal where the proofs of the prisoners' guilt were perfectly clear. Old professed thieves, aware of the compassionate feelings of juries, are, he says, desirous of being prosecuted on capital indictments rather than otherwise. "The present numerous enactments to take away life appear to me wholly ineffectual; but there are punishments which I am convinced a thief would dread, namely, a course of discipline totally reversing his former habits: idleness is one of the prominent characteristics of a professed thief-put him to labour; debauchery is another quality; abstinence is its opposite-apply it; company they indulge in; they ought, therefore, to experience solitude: they are accustomed to uncontrolled liberty of action-I would impose restraint and decorum. Were these my suggestions adopted, I have no doubt we should find a considerable reduction in the number of offenders." He states, that he has often seen juries reduce the value of things stolen, contrary to clear proof. There is no reluctance to prosecute or convict in his opinion in murder, arson, burglary, in its original sense of nocturnal housebreaking, highway robbery, with violence and murderous attacks on the person. The thieves observe the sympathy of the public; it seems to console them, and they appear less concerned than those who witness their sentence. Certainly the general feeling does not go along with the infliction of death in the case of crimes unaccompanied by violence; there are very few advocates for the generality of the present punishments; these punishments rather tend to excite the public feeling against the criminal laws." 4. Much of the above evidence sufficiently establishes the general disinclination of traders to prosecute for forgeries on themselves, or to furnish the Bank of England with the means of conviction, in cases where forged notes are uttered. There is no offence in which the infliction of death seems more repugnant to the strong and general and declared sense of the public than forgery; there is no other in which there appears to prevail a greater compassion for the offender, and more horror at capital executions. In addition to the general evidence above stated, to notorious facts, and to obvious conclusions of reason, your Committee have to state the testimony of some witnesses of peculiar weight, on the subject of forgery. Mr. John Smith, a Member of the House, and banker in London, stated, that he knew instances where prosecutions for private forgeries were relinquished on account of the punishment, and had no doubt that if the punishment was less, prosecutions would have taken place. Mr. Barnett, also a Member of the House, and a banker in London, is of opinion, that capital punishment goes extremely to discourage prosecutions in forgery; he knows many instances of this; scarcely a year passes without something of the kind; he is of opinion that the majority of private forgeries pass unpunished, on account of the severity of the punishment. The punishment of death tends, in his opinion, to prevent prosecution, and to increase the crime. Mr. J. F. Forster, a Russia merchant, and Mr. E. Forster, a banker in London, gave some remarkable examples of the repugnance to prosecute in forgery. In one, by the connivance of the prosecutor, a person, who was introduced to the magistrate as a friend of the prisoner's, desired to see the forged check, snatched it away, and threw it into the fire-a mode of avoiding prosecution, which, from other parts of the evidence, does not seem to be uncommon. In another, a forgery to the large amount of fifteen hundred pounds, where the forger and the utterer were both in custody, the prosecution was relinquished merely because the offence was capital. Had the punishment been ever so severe, short of death, no endeavour would have been made to save the offenders. In the opinion of Mr. E. Forster, more than one half of the private forgeries which are committed, escape prosecution on account of the severity of the law: he added an example of the like sentiments, in the offence of stealing in a dwelling-house, which the Committee consider as remarkable, because it occurred in the officers of a public institution, who usually allow themselves to be less influenced by their feelings than individuals: a committee of a public institution, whose house had been robbed, would not engage in the prosecution unless the goods were valued under forty shillings. In this committee were persons of respectable condition in almost all the occupations which are most liable to loss by forgeries and thefts. Mr. Fry, a banker, in London, mentioned four cases of prosecution for forgery which were prevented by the capital punishment, in one of which the party injured swallowed the forged note, that he might not be compelled to prosecute. Mr. Fry explicitly stated, what is indeed implied in the evidence of the preceding witnesses, that, as a banker, he should consider his property as much more secure if the punishment of forgery were mitigated to such a degree that the law against that offence would be generally enforced; in nine cases out of ten of forgery which he has known, there has been an indisposition to prosecute. Dr. Lushington declared that he knew, that in the minds of many persons there is a strong indisposition to prosecute, on account of the severity of the punishment; and that he had heard from the mouths of prosecutors themselves, who have prosecuted for capital offences, where there was a danger of the persons being executed, the greatest regret that they had so done; and many times they have expressed a wish, that had they been able to have foreseen the consequences, they would never have resorted to the laws of their country. He also related the case of a servant who committed a robbery upon him: the man was apprehended, and his guilt was clear; but Dr. Lushington “refused to prosecute for |