State of the Agricultural Economy: Hearing Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session, July 30, 1998U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998 - 199 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 26
Page 23
... able to participate in the remaining Spanish corn tenders and move a substantial quantity of corn there in the coming weeks . I thought I should mention these breaking developments . Thank you , Mr. Chairman . [ The prepared statement 23.
... able to participate in the remaining Spanish corn tenders and move a substantial quantity of corn there in the coming weeks . I thought I should mention these breaking developments . Thank you , Mr. Chairman . [ The prepared statement 23.
Page 26
... move forward with 2.5 million tons of purchases under the CCC charter , roughly equiva- lent to about $ 250 million without transportation included . The Secretary tendered for 550,000 tons last Friday . Additionally , pur- chases will ...
... move forward with 2.5 million tons of purchases under the CCC charter , roughly equiva- lent to about $ 250 million without transportation included . The Secretary tendered for 550,000 tons last Friday . Additionally , pur- chases will ...
Page 34
... move forward expeditiously with future tenders in the next few months . Mr. BARRETT . So there is an element of truth in that statement ? Mr. SCHUMACHER . We are working very hard and we don't want to buy and remove surplus unless we ...
... move forward expeditiously with future tenders in the next few months . Mr. BARRETT . So there is an element of truth in that statement ? Mr. SCHUMACHER . We are working very hard and we don't want to buy and remove surplus unless we ...
Page 35
... move- ments in markets , and I think it would have provided some addi- tional protection . Mr. MINGE . As I understand it , there is some concern about the cost of the program . Would it be possible to mix both a producer liability ...
... move- ments in markets , and I think it would have provided some addi- tional protection . Mr. MINGE . As I understand it , there is some concern about the cost of the program . Would it be possible to mix both a producer liability ...
Page 38
... move us further and further into the world market , which as you and your colleagues have pointed out is an increasingly aggressive place to play or to work and try to deal . You also made comments earlier about the approximately $ 2 ...
... move us further and further into the world market , which as you and your colleagues have pointed out is an increasingly aggressive place to play or to work and try to deal . You also made comments earlier about the approximately $ 2 ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
State of the Agricultural Economy: Hearing Before the Committee on ... United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture Affichage du livre entier - 1998 |
State of the Agricultural Economy: Hearing Before the Committee on ... United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture Affichage du livre entier - 1998 |
Expressions et termes fréquents
1996 farm bill acreage acres administration agricultural economy AMTA payments Asian Asian financial crisis average bushel Chairman COMBEST committee commodity prices Congress costs cotton crop insurance decline demand disaster assistance EARL POMEROY economic emergency FAIR Act farm income farm program Farm Service Agency farmers and ranchers fast track Federal flexibility Freedom to Farm going grain growers HARL higher impact important increased International Monetary Fund issue July 30 land values legislation livestock loan rates long-term look losses low prices marketing loan ments million MINGE Minnesota National North Dakota oilseeds Oklahoma Pakistan percent planted POMEROY President problems projected regions response risk management sanctions SCHUMACHER Secretary GLICKMAN sector situation SKEES soybeans statement STENHOLM subsidies talking Ted Winter Texas Thank things tion trade U.S. agriculture USDA weather wheat yields
Fréquemment cités
Page 32 - Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I want to thank you for holding this hearing. I...
Page 133 - Thank you for the opportunity to appear before this committee. I will be pleased to answer any questions at this time.
Page 104 - ... can work together to produce beneficial results for all stakeholders. Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, I greatly appreciate your leadership on this issue and look forward to working with you as this crucial piece of legislation moves forward to final passage. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have at the appropriate time. [The prepared statement of Mr. Brooks follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF JOSEPH E. BROOKS, COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF RICHMOND, ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL...
Page 133 - Union (NFU), I want to express my appreciation for having the opportunity to testify before this committee.
Page 148 - We believe it is time to bring these agencies under better control. To achieve that goal, we recommend that: "(1) The Congress lay down specific guidelines and restraints on the agencies that are to administer the laws and are given the power to adopt rules and regulations. Environmental impact statements have become burdensome and costly and should be balanced by consideration of...
Page 154 - It's not surprising, then, that America's farmers and ranchers are twice as reliant on foreign trade as the US economy as a whole, with exports accounting for an estimated 30 percent of gross cash receipts.
Page 41 - Jeff declared that they intended to "fly off the cliff and that they meant to kill themselves. The others were skeptical but the minor affirmed their seriousness, stating "You don't believe us that we are going to do it. We are going to do it. You can read it in the paper tomorrow.
Page 68 - I am firmly convinced that this is one of the most important things that we can do to protect the kind of society and government in which we have prospered and progressed.
Page 45 - There are many things that it looks to me like we are going to have to reconsider.
Page 128 - With no land idled, production increases, crop prices fall, and land values come under pressure until there is less profitability for crop production on the least productive land than for the next most profitable use for that land. The least productive land then transitions out of intertilled crops to a less intensive use, to another crop or to grazing land.