rest upon those who may have the hardihood to assume it. His righteous example will be invaluable, and will do more in its operation upon other minds to alleviate the condition of their slaves, than the good he could possibly effect by retaining the legal relation of a master.

I would press upon slaveholders the criminality of continuing the relation they now sustain to those who reap down their fields, and whose rightful hire is kept back by fraud, "for the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth." "My brethren have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons." In holding the poor labourer in slavery, the charge is justly brought against you, that "Ye have despised the poor." "But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin," James ii. 9. Are you not then committing sin, in subjecting men because they are poor, or because they are black, or because their fathers have been ever oppressed, to continued and perpetual slavery? But not only so, will you continue to abuse the Holy Bible

telism?

by making it subserve such an oppressive and soul-crushing system of human chatPeter prophesied about false teachers, who "through covetousness," "with feigned words," would "make merchandize" of the brethren. It is now

literally fulfilled in those who employ the Bible to uphold the traffic in man. But brethren the day will come when Babylon shall fall, and they who have traded with her in "the bodies and souls of men," shall stand "afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas! that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come." Before you fall in her doom, look again at that Bible you are thus in your self-delusion desecrating, and see what it says against all such wrong and oppression.

CHAPTER IX.

THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF SLAVERY WITH

THE LAWS AND PRINCIPLES OF THE OLD
TESTAMENT.

SLAVERY being defined to be a condition in which one is compelled to serve another without the means of redress when wronged, it would seem to be superfluous to attempt to shew that the Bible condemns slavery. Nevertheless it may be profitable to see in what terms the inspired books express God's mind in reference to it.

God, when he created man, enstamped upon him his own image. He endowed him with an intellectual and moral nature, with a capacity for mental and moral progress. To fetter man's mind as slavery does, is therefore rebellion against God. It is man's prerogative to have dominion, because he has an intelligent and a moral mind unlike the rest of God's visible creation. God gives him "dominion over

the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." But slavery takes this dominion from him, and in making him a chattel deposes him from the authority to which nature has entitled him. He subdues the earth, but his master takes the products; he conquers the horse, but he ploughs him for his master; not an ox, not a fowl, not a sparrow, not a reptile, can he call his own but by sufferance of his master. Has God justified this usurpation? Never! for God is no" respecter of persons." If he has endowed the white skined Franklin with a capacity to catch the lightning and enchain it, he has thereby forbid his fellow man to fetter the mind or the limbs of his genius. No less does he command that the dark-skinned Ethiopian be left at liberty to compete with Franklin or with Newton. If governments must be instituted among men, it is for the protection of the individual's liberty, and not for its restraint. It is to prevent his abuse of it, to the injury of others, but never to limit it. This is God's prerogative, not man's.

And what has God taught in his awful judgment against the earth in the days of Noah, but that man must not violate the rights of his fellow man? Is it too much to say, that slavery was the specific cause of the deluge? "The earth was filled with violence." What does this mean, if it be not man's struggles for dominion, the one over the other? This was the great wickedness that brought the waters of the flood to sweep away human life.

And what a lesson did God teach man by the four hundred years captivity of Judah and his brethren and their posterity, in consequence of their laying violent hands upon their brother and selling him into slavery? With the measure they meted, it was more than measured to them again. They said themselves, "Therefore is this distress come upon us." But neither had the Egyptians a right to enslave even those who had been guilty of enslaving their brother. And mark how God visited Pharaoh and his host with his mighty judgments, and how he overwhelmed them in the sea. And when Israel forgat that they were once in the