...no reasonable expectation of privacy in his journey on the public highway, presumably arguing that "[w]hat a person knowingly exposes to the public,...is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." 5 While not equating "the uninvited shadower in this instance with the 'uninvited ear' described in...

...and acoustical dpvicps which are used to improperly intercept private communications, it held that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of constitutional protection . . . the protection of a person's general right to privacy — his right...

...optical and acoustiai devices which are used to improperly intercept private communications, held that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home c office, is not a subject of constitutional protection . . . the protection of i person's general...

...using an otherwise public telephone booth, said : "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. See. Lewis v. United States, 385 US 206, 210 (1966) ; United States v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927)....

...using an otherwise public telephone booth, said : "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. See. 1,1-wi» v. United States, 385 US 206, 210 (1966) ; United State* v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927)....

...argument. In Katz v. United States, supra, we said that the Fourth Amendment provides no protection for what "a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office . . . ." 389 US, at 351. The physical characteristics of a person's voice, its tone and manner, as...

...Katz v. United States, 389 US 347, 351-52 (1967), the fourth amendment: "protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not subject of fourth amendment protection. [Citations omitted.] But what he seeks to preserve as private,...

...Kafz v. United States, 389 FS 347, 351-52 (1967). the fourth amendment: "protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not subject of fourth amendment protection. [Citations omitted.] But what he seeks to preserve as private,...

...close question and one to which there is no simple answer. The Supreme Court pointed out in Katz that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own . . . office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." 389 US at 351. Therefore, a document...

...close question and one to which there is no simple answer. The Supreme Court pointed out in Kate that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own . . . office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." 389 US at 351. Therefore, a document...