Telephone Privacy Act of 1990: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 4340 ... September 19, 1990U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991 - 162 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 47
Page 5
... important to recognize and encourage these new technologies. It also determined, however, that "privacy cannot be left to depend solely on physical protection or it will gradually erode as technology advances. Additional legal ...
... important to recognize and encourage these new technologies. It also determined, however, that "privacy cannot be left to depend solely on physical protection or it will gradually erode as technology advances. Additional legal ...
Page 6
... important subject. Mr. Kastenmeier. Our first witness today is a good friend and fellow colleague of mine from the State of Wisconsin, Senator Herb Kohl. The Senator is a leading proponent of Caller ID legislation. In fact, he was the ...
... important subject. Mr. Kastenmeier. Our first witness today is a good friend and fellow colleague of mine from the State of Wisconsin, Senator Herb Kohl. The Senator is a leading proponent of Caller ID legislation. In fact, he was the ...
Page 11
... important to recognize that we're not talking 100 percent either way. We're not talking about a clear issue of Caller ID with blocking being perfect and the other way being totally imperfect. There's a balance that we're looking for ...
... important to recognize that we're not talking 100 percent either way. We're not talking about a clear issue of Caller ID with blocking being perfect and the other way being totally imperfect. There's a balance that we're looking for ...
Page 13
... importance of why we have to provide this blocking. As is too often the case, when issues first hit, people seem to ... important that you also point out that people do have the right to privacy when they call their Senate office, when ...
... importance of why we have to provide this blocking. As is too often the case, when issues first hit, people seem to ... important that you also point out that people do have the right to privacy when they call their Senate office, when ...
Page 14
... important right to protect. So I want to thank you for your leadership in this, which is very critical. We appreciate it. Mr. Kohl. I appreciate that. Mr. Kastenmeier. Does the gentlemen from Virginia have a question? Mr. Slaughter. No ...
... important right to protect. So I want to thank you for your leadership in this, which is very critical. We appreciate it. Mr. Kohl. I appreciate that. Mr. Kastenmeier. Does the gentlemen from Virginia have a question? Mr. Slaughter. No ...
Expressions et termes fréquents
ability able abusive activate addition agencies allows anonymous answer Association authorized basis believe Bell Atlantic benefits bill California call blocking Call Privacy Call Trace Caller ID calling number calling party Chairman Commission Committee Communications concerns Congress consumers Court Cullen customers decision device display effective emergency example experience fact Federal give going groups harassing harassing calls hear identification important individual interests issue Jersey Kastenmeier law enforcement legislation limited marketing Moore obscene offer Office operations option passed person phone call phone companies phone number Poat police position problem protect question reasons receiving recently reported require result Return Senate solution statement subscribe telecommunications telephone calls telephone companies telephone number Thank trap and trace undercover unrestricted Caller ID utility victim
Fréquemment cités
Page 84 - What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection.
Page 41 - Advocates that if calling number delivery services are to be permitted to be offered to the public, such services must be offered with a mechanism which allows customers to block the transmission of their phone number at least on a per-call basis and at no additional charge to the caller. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates authorizes its Executive Committee to develop specific positions consistent with the terms of this resolution on a legislative...
Page 79 - Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee: I greatly appreciate the opportunity to testify before you today on behalf of the...
Page 87 - ... trap and trace device" means a device which captures the incoming electronic or other impulses which identify the originating number of an instrument or device from which a wire or electronic communication was transmitted...
Page 58 - Code require the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Other provisions require the Department of Finance to...
Page 41 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that NASUCA authorizes its Executive Committee to develop specific positions and to take appropriate actions consistent with the terms of this resolution. The Executive Committee shall advise the membership of any proposed action prior to taking such action if possible. In any event, the Executive Committee shall notify the membership of any action taken pursuant to this provision.
Page 40 - I want to thank the subcommittee for the opportunity to testify today. 14 1989-15 THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES RESOLUTION Resolving That Calling Number Identification Services Should Only Be Offered If A Caller "ID Blocking Mechanism Is Offered At The Same Time WHEREAS, Telecommunications Companies are offering or are planning to offer services which will display on separately purchased Customer Premises Equipment the telephone number of the calling party before a...
Page 86 - Development of photocopying machines, electronic computers and other sophisticated instruments have accelerated the ability of government to intrude into areas which a person normally chooses to exclude from prying eyes and inquisitive minds. Consequently judicial interpretations of the reach of the constitutional protection of individual privacy must keep pace with the perils created by these new devices.
Page 58 - The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Page 78 - ... provider, or to the protection of users of that service from abuse of service or unlawful use of service; or (2) to record the fact that a wire or electronic communication was initiated or completed in order to protect such...