Reading Horizons, Volume 49,Nummer 3College of Education Western Michigan University and the Homer L.J. Carter Reading Council, 2009 |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-3 van 7
Pagina 241
... evaluative versus descriptive , task- oriented versus student - oriented , and improvement - oriented versus achievement - ori- ented ( Tunstall & Gipps , 1996 ) . While students received feedback that was evaluative and descriptive in ...
... evaluative versus descriptive , task- oriented versus student - oriented , and improvement - oriented versus achievement - ori- ented ( Tunstall & Gipps , 1996 ) . While students received feedback that was evaluative and descriptive in ...
Pagina 244
... evaluative . Improvement - oriented feedback refers to feedback that guides a student to improve while evaluative feedback informs stu- dents whether they were right or wrong . Evaluative feedback can be further divided into two ...
... evaluative . Improvement - oriented feedback refers to feedback that guides a student to improve while evaluative feedback informs stu- dents whether they were right or wrong . Evaluative feedback can be further divided into two ...
Pagina 250
... evaluative feedback than weak student writers . This seems reasonable since strong student writers most likely have more positive aspects in their writing than negative aspects , which is why they are considered to be " strong " student ...
... evaluative feedback than weak student writers . This seems reasonable since strong student writers most likely have more positive aspects in their writing than negative aspects , which is why they are considered to be " strong " student ...
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
Adrian College approach of feedback Center changes classroom companion TV websites content categories content feedback curricular curriculum Deborah Sampson developmentally appropriate early literacy Educational Research emergent literacy evaluative feedback expectations explicit explore feedback given formative assessment Gehsmann girls given to strong grade level hypertext ideas improvement-oriented feedback Internet intertextual connections intertextual links ISBN issues Journal kindergarten kindergarten teachers Kristeva learning level band literacy instruction literacy practices London Group Longwood University media studies Michigan multiliteracies multimodal NAEYC negative participants perspective professional development programs questions Rachel raising student achievement readers reading and writing Reading Horizons Reading Research Quarterly respondents Retrieved scaffolding sentence fluency SIX TRAITS standards strong and weak Strong student writers student writers received survey teach television websites texts topic TV-Internet connections University University of Dayton University of Michigan-Flint voice weak student writers weak writers received Western Michigan University York young children