Nomination--Federal Trade Commission: Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, on Daniel Oliver, to be Chairman, and Andrew J. Strenio, Jr., to be a Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission, February 25, 1986U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 33 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 10
Page 1
... consider- ing the nominations of Daniel Oliver and Andrew J. Strenio , Jr. , to the Federal Trade Commission . The President has nominated Daniel Oliver for the remainder of former FTC Chairman Jim Miller's term , which expires in ...
... consider- ing the nominations of Daniel Oliver and Andrew J. Strenio , Jr. , to the Federal Trade Commission . The President has nominated Daniel Oliver for the remainder of former FTC Chairman Jim Miller's term , which expires in ...
Page 2
... considering Daniel Oliver and Andrew J. Strenio , Jr. , as nominees to the Federal Trade Com- mission ( FTC ) . Daniel Oliver has been nominated by the President to serve for the remainder of former FTC Chairman Jim Miller's term ...
... considering Daniel Oliver and Andrew J. Strenio , Jr. , as nominees to the Federal Trade Com- mission ( FTC ) . Daniel Oliver has been nominated by the President to serve for the remainder of former FTC Chairman Jim Miller's term ...
Page 4
... consider . I am not saying there isn't any need but I don't know whether or not there is a need for that kind of legislation . Senator KASTEN . I think it is one of the issues that we may be pursuing and I thank you for your answer ...
... consider . I am not saying there isn't any need but I don't know whether or not there is a need for that kind of legislation . Senator KASTEN . I think it is one of the issues that we may be pursuing and I thank you for your answer ...
Page 12
... consider whether codifying a definition of deception would be useful . Recently a definition was proposed which , it was claimed , only codified existing law . Objections were raised that the proposed definition differed substan- tially ...
... consider whether codifying a definition of deception would be useful . Recently a definition was proposed which , it was claimed , only codified existing law . Objections were raised that the proposed definition differed substan- tially ...
Page 15
... consider the presence and effects of foreign competition , and that they currently do so . Not having seen any studies on this issue , I do not know whether any adjustment in the antitrust laws should be made . Question 6. What ...
... consider the presence and effects of foreign competition , and that they currently do so . Not having seen any studies on this issue , I do not know whether any adjustment in the antitrust laws should be made . Question 6. What ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
agency alcohol advertising amendments Andrew Answer anti-competitive antitrust enforcement antitrust jurisdiction antitrust laws areas authority to ban believe the FTC benefit budget Chairman Clayton Act codifying Commissioner competition Congress Congressional consumer protection DANIEL OLIVER Department of Justice Department's Vertical Restraints efficiency enforcing the law Federal Trade Commission Fordham Law School FTC Act FTC activities FTC rules FTC staff FTC was originally FTC's antitrust function Harvard Law School horizontal mergers industry injury in rulemaking issues Justice Department Justice Merger Guidelines Kennedy School mandate McCarran-Ferguson Act ment mission nominated non-public enforce OLIVER Question opinion POSTHEARING QUESTIONS practices predatory pricing PREHEARING QUESTIONS price discrimination proposed protecting consumers QUESTION OF SENATOR resale price maintenance role School of Government Section Senator FORD Senator KASTEN sion small businesses specific State-regulated professions Statement on Horizontal statutory STRENIO Question Ticor tion U.S. SENATE unfair methods vertical mergers violations Washington York
Fréquemment cités
Page 3 - People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.
Page 3 - It is of serious interest to the country that the people at large should have no lobby and be voiceless in these matters, while great bodies of astute men seek to create an artificial opinion and to overcome the interests of the public for their private profit.
Page 4 - I would be pleased to answer any questions you or any other members of the Committee may have.
Page 31 - ... Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 in order to require that imported woven labels must have woven into them the name of the country where woven.
Page 8 - I would like to thank you very much for this opportunity to appear before you and would like to answer any questions that might be forthcoming.
Page 26 - In sum, we conclude that the appropriate decision is to return to the rule of reason that governed vertical restrictions prior to Schwinn . When anticompetitive effects are shown to result from particular vertical restrictions they can be adequately policed under the rule of reason, the standard traditionally applied for the majority of anticompetitive practices challenged under § 1 of the Act.
Page 26 - Continental TV, Inc., et al. v. GTE Sylvania. Inc., 433 US 36 (1977...
Page 7 - I am practicing at the New York City law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
Page 32 - Sess. 259-378 (1976). justice shall reside in the attorney general." But in extraordinary cases, where the conduct of high ranking Executive Branch officials appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the President is involved, a separate mechanism is needed. The Supreme Court, in Humphrey's Executor v. United States. 295 US 602, 629 (1935), stated that, One who holds his office during the pleasure of another, cannot be depended upon to maintain an attitude of independence against the letter's will.
Page 20 - FTC staff provide a copy of the final version to the relevant committees as soon as filing is authorized by the entire Commission).