Impeachment Inquiry: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to H. Res 128, Impeaching Alcee L. Hastings, Judge of the United States District Court ... May 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, June 1, 9, July 6 and 7, 1988U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988 - 623 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 58
Page 17
... provides " that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida shall procure .. all records , transcripts , minutes , and exhibits of Grand Jury 81-1 - GJ ( MIA ) . " The court ordered that the only place that the ...
... provides " that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida shall procure .. all records , transcripts , minutes , and exhibits of Grand Jury 81-1 - GJ ( MIA ) . " The court ordered that the only place that the ...
Page 23
... provides a model of the kinds of carefully balanced restrictions that district courts have traditionally imposed to restrict disclosure of grand jury material in order to protect the interests of all concerned . • 3. The terms of the ...
... provides a model of the kinds of carefully balanced restrictions that district courts have traditionally imposed to restrict disclosure of grand jury material in order to protect the interests of all concerned . • 3. The terms of the ...
Page 55
... provides for the impeachment of Judge Hastings . This , too , was referred to the Committee . On July 15 , 1987 , the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee , Representative Peter W. Rodino , Jr. , wrote to Chief Judge King of the United ...
... provides for the impeachment of Judge Hastings . This , too , was referred to the Committee . On July 15 , 1987 , the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee , Representative Peter W. Rodino , Jr. , wrote to Chief Judge King of the United ...
Page 57
... provides that the Senate shall have the " sole " power to try all impeachments . Claiborne v . United States Senate , ( D.D.C. , C.A. No. 86-2780 , October 8 , 1986 transcript , attached hereto as Exhibit C , and contained in ...
... provides that the Senate shall have the " sole " power to try all impeachments . Claiborne v . United States Senate , ( D.D.C. , C.A. No. 86-2780 , October 8 , 1986 transcript , attached hereto as Exhibit C , and contained in ...
Page 66
... provides for both disclosure ( Rule 6 ( e ) ( 3 ) ( C ) ) and the procedure to be followed when disclosure is sought " preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceedings . " ( Rule 6 ( e ) ( 3 ) ( D ) ) . Since the Chairman's ...
... provides for both disclosure ( Rule 6 ( e ) ( 3 ) ( C ) ) and the procedure to be followed when disclosure is sought " preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceedings . " ( Rule 6 ( e ) ( 3 ) ( D ) ) . Since the Chairman's ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
11th Cir access to grand August authority Butzner CERTIFICATE Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cleveland State University Committee's request conduct confidentiality constitutional Copy Grand Jury Court of Appeals Debate Clause denied Department of Justice disclosed disclosure of grand District Court District Judge Alcee District of Florida double jeopardy Douglas Oil Eleventh Circuit Emergency Motion Federal filed Grand Jury 81-1 grand jury materials grand jury proceedings grand jury record granted Honorable House of Representatives impeachment inquiry impeachment proceedings indictment Inspect and Copy interests Investigating Committee issues James Lawrence King Judge Butzner Judge Hastings Judge Hastings's Judicial Conference Judicial Council judicial proceeding Judiciary Committee legislative Miami Petition to Inspect procedures Public Integrity Section pursuant Report and Recommendation Rule 6(e rule of secrecy Senate separation of powers September 21 sole power Southern District Special Counsel Subcommittee Supp transcripts U.S. Const United States Attorney United States District United States House University of Miami
Fréquemment cités
Page 548 - Intervene; or (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or Impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's Interest is adequately represented by existing parties.
Page 122 - But we think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion, with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution, which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it, in the manner most beneficial to the people.
Page 708 - ... use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when...
Page 700 - F.2d 617, 628-629, stated that such reasons were : "(1) To prevent the escape of those whose indictment may be contemplated ; (2) to insure the utmost freedom to the grand jury in its deliberations, and to prevent persons subject to indictment or their friends from importuning the grand jurors; (3) to prevent subornation of perjury or tampering with the witnesses who may testify before grand jury and later appear at the trial of those indicted by it...
Page 738 - F. 2d 617, 628-629, those reasons were summarized as follows : "(1) To prevent the escape of those whose Indictment may be contemplated; (2) to Insure the utmost freedom to the grand jury In Its deliberations, and to prevent persons subject to Indictment or their friends from Importuning the grand jurors; (3) to prevent subornation of perjury or tampering with the witnesses who may testify before...
Page 709 - It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire or oral communication where such person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception...
Page 200 - A President's acknowledged need for confidentiality in the communications of his office is general in nature, whereas the constitutional need for production of relevant evidence in a criminal proceeding is specific and central to the fair adjudication of a particular criminal case in the administration of justice. Without access to specific facts a criminal prosecution may be totally frustrated.
Page 386 - Any investigative or law enforcement officer who, by an means authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, may disclose such contents to another investigative or law enforcement officer to the extent that such disclosure is appropriate to the proper performance of the official duties of the officer making or receiving the disclosure.
Page 718 - ... grounds of the motion. If the motion is granted, the contents of the intercepted wire or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, shall be treated as having been obtained in violation of this chapter. The judge, upon the filing of such motion by the aggrieved person, may in his discretion make available to the aggrieved person or his counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted communication or evidence derived therefrom as the judge determines to be in the interests of justice.
Page 714 - ... murder, kidnapping, gambling, robbery, bribery, extortion, or dealing in narcotic drugs, marihuana or other dangerous drugs, or other crime dangerous to life, limb, or property, and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, designated in any applicable State statute authorizing such interception, or any conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing offenses.