Images de page
PDF
ePub

testimony of two identified and available witnesses and related exhibits presented

to a recent grand jury that
jury that returned

indictment;

no

(3) The doctrine of separation of powers and the principles articulated in United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983), 418 (1983), preclude the disclosure of either the electronic surveillance or the grand jury material on the record before the court, a record a record that suggested the possibility of as well as the potential for Justice Department misuse of the grand jury's powers to make an impeachment record rather than to investigate a crime;

and

(4) No disclosure or testimony of the elected official's grand jury testimony could properly be be authorized until the elected official had been given notice

and an opportunity to be heard on the Com

mittee's requests.

5

Statement of Facts

The Justice Department's Initial
Investigation and Disposition

Kevin Gordon was a zoning officer for
in Dade County,

a

small

municipality

Florida. Federal prosecutors in Miami believed that he was involved in criminal activity. In July 1985, they applied for authorization to tap his telephones. The application was approved by Judge Hastings, as duty judge, and he thereafter received progress reports and requests for

extensions.

On September 9, 1985, federal agents intercepted and recorded a telephone conversation between Gordon and attorney Richard Bonehill. In the course of that conversation, Gordon described a conversation that Gordon said he had had with Steven Clark, the elected Mayor of Dade County.

Gordon told Bonehill that the

mayor had told Gordon that Judge Hastings

had warned the mayor to stay away form

Gordon because Gordon was "hot".

The Justice Department promply terminated the investigation into Gordon's conduct and launched one into Judge Hastings's conduct. The Department ultimately persuaded Gordon to cooperate and used him to record a conversation with the

mayor.

reiterated his claim

The mayor reiterated

that the source of his information that

Gordon was "hot" was Judge Hastings, but did not suggest that Judge Hastings had disclosed that Gordon was under surveil

lance.

The Department

thereafter

persuaded Mayor Clark to submit to an interview and thereafter used the powers of Grand Jury 86-3 (Miami) to compel and record his testimony as well as that of an

FBI agent who had participated

investigation.

According to the

in the

Department, the

mayor reported that he

had

attended a

7

public meeting in a Miami hotel at which

Judge Hastings

Hastings spoke on the morning of

September 6, 1985.

The mayor alleged that Judge Hastings had taken him aside after the speech and told him to "stay away from Kevin Gordon, "; "he's hot"; and "he's using your name in Hialeah."

The Department

reported that the FBI had

interviewed

other people who had attended the speech, but had been unable to find anyone who had

observed any conversation

interaction

between Judge Hastings

Hastings and Mayor Clark

following the speech.

Nonetheless, the Department

called

Mayor Clark and FBI agent Chris Mazzella

to testify before the grand jury on March 20, 1986.

No indictment

was returned,

however, and the Justice Department has

not identified any ground upon which one might properly have been sought.1

1

Sources close to the investigation have reportedly indicated that the Justice Department used the grand jury knowing

On September 26, 1986, the Justice Department transmitted the allegations it had developed to the chief judge of the Eleventh Circuit in the form of a letter

complaint pursuant to the Judicial Councils Reform and Judicial Conduct and DisChief Judge

ability Act (the "Act"). 2

Roney

subsequently appointed a special

committee to investigate the complaint and submit its report to the circuit council in accordance with the Act.

3

that there were no criminal matters to be investigated:

When prosecutors decided they could not find a federal criminal statute that applied, they decided to press for Hastings' impeachment rather than a criminal indictment, sources said. Clark was called before a federal grand jury to testify about his role on March 20, 1986. "U.S. Says Hastings Compromised Sting," The Miami Herald, Fri., Nov. 13, 1987, at Al, 1 & 22.

2

Pub. L. No. 96-458, 94 stat. 2035 (1980), codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. §§ 331, 332, 372 (c), 604 (h) (1982 & Supp. 1984).

3 At Judge Hasting request, Chief Judge Roney joined in authorizing the disclosure in the proceedings below of the Justice

9

« PrécédentContinuer »