Transforming Process Theism

Voorkant
SUNY Press, 26 mei 2000 - 380 pagina's
Process theism, in a variety of manifestations and modifications stemming from Whitehead's original suggestions, dominates discussions of philosophical and natural theology in Europe and America. In Transforming Process Theism Ford argues that subsequent modifications of Whitehead's original line of thought mask a fundamental and unresolved aporia in that original proposal: since only past or "objectified" determinate events can influence present experiences and since God, as conceived by Whitehead, is never fully determinate or objectifiable as a "past event," it is difficult to see how this divine persuasive power can have any influence on the present as a source of creativity and genuinely new possibilities for enactment.

Ford meticulously reconstructs and evaluates Whitehead's own versions of theism, and he critically appraises the most influential subsequent modifications of these unrecognized variants by other process thinkers. He recovers the original trajectory of Whitehead's continuous revision of his conception of God, and forges an appropriate solution to this central aporia. He concludes that--consistent with Whitehead's overarching metaphysical principles, there is another kind of causal influence that does not require objectification, and is the opposite of past determinateness. The future, conceived as active, offers an account of subjectivity which is both universal and transcendent. God, according to Ford's revisions, must be understood as this particular but indefinite creativity or universal activity of the future, bestowing subjectivity on each present occasion of experience without ever becoming determinate.

 

Geselecteerde pagina's

Inhoudsopgave

The Intelligibility of Future Activity
1
2 Ways in Which God Is Future
3
3 Ways in Which God Is Not Future
4
1 Divine Persuasion Replaces Classical Omnipotence
5
2 God Need Not Be Conceived as Creator Ex Nihilo
7
3 Becoming Is Primary Being Is Derivative
8
III Toward a New Conception of the Future
9
1 Modes of Actuality
10
VI Lewis S Ford
169
The Power of the Past
177
II Hartshorne and the Objectification of God
183
1 The Principle of Prehension
186
Objection 1 Divine Occasions Are Exceptions to the Metaphysical Principles
187
Objection 2 Alternation and Asynchronicity
188
Objection 3 Divine Occasions Are Not Persuasive
189
Objection 4 Divine Occasions Limit Creaturely Freedom
190

2 The Future as Actually Indeterminate
11
3 The Future as the Source of Creativity
12
4 The Future as the Source of Aim
13
5 The Nature of the Future as Actual
14
The Principle of Limitation
21
Criticisms
27
Types of Limitation
38
Deconstructing Theism
41
God as Temporal and Concrescent
46
God as Nontemporal and Concrescent
49
IV The Early Concept
57
Reconstructing Nontemporal Theism
59
I A COMPARISON OF CONCEPTS
60
3 The Middle Concept
65
II Possible Solutions to the Riddle
68
2 The Role of Religion
72
3 Temporalist Implications
74
III A Possible External Influence
78
2 Whiteheads Reaction
80
IV The Initial Concept of God
81
1 Actual Entity
82
2 Transcendence
83
3 SelfCausation
84
4 Instance of Creativity
85
V The 1926 Metaphysical Principles
86
1 The Principle of Solidarity
87
3 The Principle of Efficient Causation
88
VI The 1927 Metaphysical Principles
89
VII The Middle Concept of God
90
1 Preconditions for the Middle Concept
93
2 Precipitating Factors
96
Reconstructing Process Theism
103
1 Exemplifying the Metaphysical Principles
104
2 Nontemporal Subjectivity
106
II Precipitating Factors
114
2 The Locus of Integration
117
3 Is Consciousness the Reason for Process Theism?
120
4 Is Everlastingness the Reason for Process Theism?
122
5 What about the Provision of Subjective Aim?
124
6 The Intensification of Process
125
III Whiteheads Problematic Legacy
130
1 How God Affects the World
131
2 The Fourth Phase
132
3 Apparent Responsiveness and Nontemporal Valuation
134
4 Later Writings
136
The Divine Power in the Present
143
II Marjorie Suchoki
152
III Palmyre Oomen
163
IV Jorge Nobo
164
V Elizabeth M Kraus
167
Objection 5 It Undercuts Nontemporal Subjectivity
193
Objection 7 How Can the Initial Aims Be Selected?
194
Objection 8 Eternal Objects Become Everlasting
195
4 The Objection from Relativity Physics
196
Process Nontemporality
203
III The Metaphysical Principles
212
IV Nontemporal Decision and Determination
215
The Power of the Future
229
1 God and Creativity
230
2 God and Being
231
3 God and Eternity
233
5 God As Becoming
234
II The Identification of God with Future Creativity
236
2 Divine Responsiveness
237
3 Perfect Power
238
4 God as Empty
239
III The Infusion of Creativity
241
1 Modes of Actuality
243
2 Prehension and the Infusion of Creativity
247
3 Aim
251
4 The Interdependence of Creativity and Aim
255
Persistence and the Extensive Continuum
261
1 Diremption
262
2 Emergence of Persistence
263
3 Atrophy
265
4 Inclusive Occasions
269
5 Physical Perception and Prehension
274
6 Future Physical Perception
279
7 Divine Consciousness
281
II The Extensive Continuum
282
1 The Ontological Status of the Extensive Continuum
283
2 The Extensive Continuum and Societies
285
3 Relativity Physics
287
4 In Unison of Becoming
288
5 The Locus of all Locations
289
6 Locus and Passage
292
7 Divine Privacy and Publicity
294
Creativity and Contingency
297
2 Eschatological Actuality
299
II Contingency
302
2 Rationalist and Empiricist Process Theology
306
3 Uniqueness and Primacy
310
4 Divine Satisfaction
315
III Concluding Objections
316
Objection 2 Is My Claim That Creativity Is Derived from God Too Much Biased in the Direction of Western Monotheism?
317
Objection 3 Isnt It Blasphemous to Suppose That Our Own Subjectivity Is Simply a Continuation of Gods? Isnt This Simply a Kind of Temporalistic ...
318
Objection 4 Does Not the Ontotheological Stricture Exclude the Possibility of God as Future Creativity?
320
Notes
323
Index
365
Copyright

Overige edities - Alles bekijken

Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen

Over de auteur (2000)

Lewis S. Ford is Louis I. Jaffe Professor of Philosophy, Emeritus, Old Dominion University. He is the author of The Emergence of Whitehead's Metaphysics, 1925-1929, also published by SUNY Press, The Lure of God: A Biblical Background for Process Theism, and he is coeditor (with George L. Kline) of Explorations in Whitehead's Philosophy. From 1971-1996, he was the editor of the scholarly quarterly, Process Studies.

Bibliografische gegevens