Commission Hearings: Supporting Materials for the Report of the National Commission for the Review of Federal and State Laws Relating to Wiretapping and Electronic SurveillanceNational Commission for the Review of Federal and State Laws Relating to Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance, 1976 - 1664 pages |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
affidavit agencies application approval ARONWALD arrested ATTORNEY GENERAL SAXBE authorized Bronx County Bureau calls CHAIRMAN ERICKSON charged City cocaine Commission COMMISSIONER BLAKEY communications CONGRESSMAN conversations convicted counterfeit County court order criminal defendant Department of Justice devices district attorney's office drug eavesdropping electronic surveillance equipment evidence Federal gambling going GOLDSTOCK Grand Jury Gunningham indicted interception investigation involved jail Jersey judge KASTENMEIER KELLEY Kuranty law enforcement LIPMAN Lopez LORDI ment MEROLA MODESITT narcotics national security obtained operation organized crime percent person PETERSEN Philadelphia probable cause problem procedures PROFESSOR BLAKEY PROFESSOR WESTIN prosecution prosecutors question record REMINGTON request robbery Schebergen SECRETARY MACDONALD SENATOR ABOUREZK SENATOR HRUSKA sentence SHIENTAG special agent statute supervising tape telephone testimony tion Title United States Attorney United States Code vestigation Vincent Papa Vincent Rizzo violations WAMPLER warrant wire wiretap York York City York County
Fréquemment cités
Page vi - Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.
Page 244 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Page vi - Schedule under section 5332 of such title, and (2) procure temporary and intermittent services to the same extent as is authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, but at rates not to exceed $50 a day for individuals.
Page vi - House is in session, has recessed, or has adjourned, to hold such hearings, and to require by subpena or otherwise the attendance and testimony of such witnesses and the production of such books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and.
Page vi - Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon...
Page 319 - Is about to commit a particular offense enumerated in section 2516 of this chapter; (b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications concerning that offense will be obtained through such Interception ; (c) normal Investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous...
Page 216 - As used in this chapter — (1) "wire communication" means any communication made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception furnished or operated by any person engaged as a common carrier in providing or operating such facilities for the transmission of interstate or foreign communications; (2) "oral communication" means any oral communication uttered...
Page vi - (c) The members of the Commission from private life shall each receive $50 per diem when engaged In the actual performance of duties vested In the Commission, plus reimbursement for travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses Incurred by them In the performance of such duties.
Page 95 - If the conduct and revelations of an agent operating without electronic equipment do not invade the defendant's constitutionally justifiable expectations of privacy, neither does a simultaneous recording of the same conversations made by the agent or by others from transmissions received from the agent to whom the defendant is talking and whose trustworthiness the defendant necessarily risks.
Page 95 - For constitutional purposes, no different result is required if the agent instead of immediately reporting and transcribing his conversations with defendant, either ( 1 ) simultaneously records them with electronic equipment which he is carrying on his person, Lopez v. United States, supra; (2) or carries radio equipment which simultaneously transmits the conversations either to recording equipment located elsewhere or to other agents monitoring the transmitting frequency.