« VorigeDoorgaan »
in my good conscience. My frank harsh- disposal.” Clarendon would, no doubt, ness of manner was the cause of all my have liked the Parliament to have greater misfortunes." The slyness which lurks purity and less power. Charles felt that under this sort of roughness is the slyest the Parliament could never again recede to thing in the whole world.
the position which it had occupied in the The general view which the latter part of early part of the century, and that the the Life affords of the state of the country only chance of maintaining his power was at the Restoration is exceedingly interesting. by the use of influence. The honester man When attentively read, it shows what an of the two was less favourable to freedom immense change had been made by the than the other. A remarkable summary civil war in the position of Royalty, not- of Clarendon's own views is given in the withstanding the eagerness with which latter part of the book : Charles was welcomed back in the first inIt has been usual to represent
He did never dissemble from the time of his Clarendon as the grave Mentor, the parti- return with the King, whom he had likewise san of decency and order, who was driven prepared and disposed to the samo sentiments, into exile by the gross ingratitude and whilst His Majesty was abroad, that his opinion wickedness of a King who could not bear was that the late rebellion never could be exhis own vices to be reproved, and of a King's regal and inherent power and preroga.
tirpated and pulled up by the roots till the Court which was the natural enemy of all tive shoulů be fully avowed and vindicated, and decency and gravity. In all this there is a till the usurpations in both Houses of Purliagood deal of truth, but it is not quite the ment, since the year 1640, were disclaimed and whole truth. There are many indications made odious; and many other excesses which which it is impossible to mistake, though it had been affected by both before that time, unwould be difficult to exhibit them at full der the name of Privileges, should be restrained length in a movlerate compass, that, apart
or explained. from and over and above the offence given This was the leading idea of all his policy, by Clarendon's well-deserved rebukes of Charles and his vices, Charles perceived and it is to be traced, in a variety of minuto that he did not enter into the spirit of the ways, in all that he has to say on the subtimes, but belonged to a different age. lle could not forgive Charles for being less
ject of the management of public atiairs. Throughout the whole of his book he speaks of the Presbyterian party in a tone of of a Tory than himself: rancorous moral condemnation. They had, he says in one place, no title to their lives ence or esteem for antiquity and did, in truth,
The King had in his nature so little reverexcept the King's mercy. All his policy so much contemn old orders, forms, and instiwas in the same direction. He never could tutions, that the objections of novelty rather look upon any of the doings of the Long advanced than obstructed any proposition. Parliament with toleration. For instance, the Triennial Act was then as much a part There are a good many incidental reof the law of the land as any other; yet marks in Clarendon's Lite which throw Charles said, in so many words, apparently light on the manners of the age which he with the full concurrence of his Chancellor, describes. He gives an account, for inthat he would never permit a Parliament stance, of his way of spending his time to assemble under its provisions, because when he began to get business at the Bar they were derogatory to the Royal power. - i. e. at some period being between 1630 So Clarendon continually tried to get the and 1640. How he spent his mornings King to dissolve the Parliament elected does not appear; but he saw his friends at after his return the second Long Parlia- dinner, in the middle of the day. The ment, as it was called. This seemed, and afternoons “ he dedicated to the business of perhaps in some respects actually was, a his profession,” and be read “ polite learnconstitutional measure, but Charles's rea- ing" at night. “ He never supped for many sons for not doing so show what the real years before the troubles brought in that issue between himself and his Chancellor custom.” His vacation he passed in study, was. He refused to dissolve the Parlia- except two months in the summer, when ment because he thought he could govern he went out of town. He alterwards through it. His other counsellors told him speaks of the House of Commons rising at " that he would never bave such another four as a “disorderly hour,” and refers to Parliament, where he had near one hundred dinners given by the popular leaders atter members of his own menial servants and the House had risen. " Probably this is their near relations, who were all at. his what he means by the troubles bringing in the custom of supping. During the civil the bookseller's calling from its condition war there was a rapid transport of de- in his younger days.
“ Then,” he says, spatches, " when gentlemen undertook the "Little Britain was a plentiful and perpetual service, which they were willing enough to emporium of learned authors, and men do," between London and York. Letters went thither as to a market, where they went out at twelve on Saturday night and seldom failed to meet with a greater conthe answer returned at ten on Monday versation. And the booksellers themselves morning: Clarendon, too, gives us the first were knowing and conversible men, with notice of newspapers :
whom, for the sake of bookish knowledge,
the greatest wits were pleased to converse.' After he (the King) had read his several let- Thomas Guy, with whose memoir Mr. ters of intelligence, he took out the prints of Knight's book opens, was not one of these. diurnals, and speeches, and the like, which His life, however, was well worth telling: were every day printed at London.
The son of a Thames lighterman who died
when he was eight years old, he was apAfter the Restoration, he speaks of bank- prenticed in 1660 to a bookseller in Cheapers as —
side. In 1668, just after the Great Fire, A tribe that had risen and grown up in Crom- master of a little shop“ near Stocks Mar
he began business on his own account as well's time, and never were heard of before the late troubles, till when the whole trade of ket,” at the corner of Cornhill and Lommoney had passed through the hands of the bard street. The office of King's printer, scriveners.
carrying with it a monoply in the printing of
Bibles, having continued in one careless He thinks it necessary to explain the word family for more than a century, the volumes ** million ” as often as he uses it, by adding, bad come to be so “very bad, both in letin a parenthesis, “ Ten hundred thousand." ter and in paper,” that they were hardly
In concluding a notice of Clarendon's legible. Guy was the most enterprising of History of the Rebellion, some time ago, we several booksellers who started a profitable
" But gave a specimen of his occasional elo- trade in Bibles, printed in Holland. quence. We will conclude this notice of this trade,” says Maitland, “proving not his Life, which is far from being an eloquent only very detrimental to the pnblic revenue, book, with a specimen of the wonderful but likewise to the King's printer, all ways clumsiness into which he habitually allowed and means were devised to quash the same; himself to slide when he wrote under no which, being vigorously put in execution, the special excitement. As a clue to the laby- booksellers, by frequent seizures and prosrinth, we may observe that Clarendon ecutions, became so great sufferers that meant that Lord Falmouth despised Pen, they judged a further pursuit thereof inconand that Mr. Coventry supported him:
sistent with their interest." Guy found it
his interest to abandon the trade very early. The Earl of Falmouth and Mr. Coventry He made a compromise with the monopolwere rivals who should have most interest in ists and obtained leave to print Bibles in the Duke, who loved the Earl best, but thought London, with types imported from Holland. the other the wiser man, who supported Pen Thereby he soon grew rich. Mr. Knight (who disobliged all the courtiers), even against mistrusis the common stories of his stingthe Earl, who contemned Pen.
iness, and finds him guilty of nothing but Here are five “ whos” in one sentence, and ly denies the other stories to the effect that
"the most scrupulous frugality.” He bolileach refers to a different antecedent namely, 1, Falmouth and Coventry; 2, buying as cheaply as he could the paper
he made a great part of his wealth by The Duke of York; 3, Coventry ; 4, Pen; with which it was the custom to and 5, Falmouth.
рау sailors, and then converting them into money at something like their real value. That, says Mr. Knight, was a practice of Charles the Second's day, but not of Queen
Anne's. Guy doubtless enriched himself From the Examiner,
partly by the sale of Bibles, and yet more Shalows of the Old Booksellers. By Charles by investing the profits of that sale in the Knight. Bell and Daldy.
buying of Government stock and other
lawful ways of making money on 'Change. In his Lives of his three famous brothers, In 1720 he spent 45,5001. in buying South Roger North deplores the degradation of Sea stock at 1201. for the 1001. share. He
in my good conscience. My frank harsh- disposal.” Clarendon would, no doubs, ness of manner was the cause of all my have liked the Parliament to have greater misfortunes." The slyness which lurks purity and less power. Charles felt that under this sort of roughness is the skyest the Parliament could never again recede to thing in the whole world.
the position which it had occupied in the The general view which the latter part of early part of the century, and that the the Lite affords of the state of the country only chance of maintaining his power was at the Restoration is exceedingly interesting by the use of influence. The honester man When attentively read, it shows what an of the two was less favourable to freedom innonse change had been made by the than the other. A remarkable summary civil war in the position of Royalty, not- of Clarendon's own views is given in the withstanding the eagerness with which latter part of the book :Charles was welcomed back in the first instange It has been usual to represent He did never dissemble from the time of his Clarendon as the grave Mentor, the parti- return with the King, whom he had likewise an of decency and order, who was driven prepared and disposed to the same sentiments, into exile by the gross ingratitude and whilst His Majesty was abroad, that his opinion wekecuess of a King who could not bear was that the late rebellion never could be exhis own vices to be reproved, and of a King's regal and inherent power and preroga
tirpated and pulled up by the roots till the Cours which was the natural enemy of all tive should be fully avowed and vindicated, and deesuey and greatly. In all this there is a till the usurpations in both
Houses of Parliapood deal of truth, but it is not quite the ment, since the year 1640, were disclaimed and vuole truth. There are many indications made odious; and many other excesses which mihi imposable to mistake, though it had been affected by both before that time, un
l be difficult to exhibit them at full der the name of Privileges, should be restrained length in moderate compass, that, apart
or explained. Free wekever and above the offence given This was the leading idea of all his policy, oy Clavenwelle eserved rebukes of Charles wat his viens Charles perceived and it is to be traced, in a variety of minute that he did the vendeve into the spirit of the ways, in all that he has to say on the subs but belonged to a different age.
ject of the management of public affairs. broughout the whole of his book he speaks He could not forgive Charles for being less tes Presbyterian party in a tone of of a Tory than himself:us moral condemnation. They had,
The King had in his nature so little reverone place, no title to their lives The King's merey. All 'his policy so much contemn old orders ence or esteem for antiquity and truth,
instisame direction. He never could tutions, that the objections
ather w of the doings of the Long advanced than obstructed
i toleration. For instance,
renee of his Chancellor, descri
provisions, because whe
the custom of supping. During the core the books's soie war there was a rapid transpun ade base cam -TE* he sky spatehes, " when gentlemen in te - Linie Ernap: ZVOLE service, which they were 13 Esch so enorme care learbe 358 min do," between London and York. L-ies wicieber as 10 & Liitin #r* LIMI went out at twelve on Saturday ari asl suo imed to Deet voi mele " the answer returned at ten on Molar Terst se. morning: Claren ion, too. gires the s5 wire Dopraai etes u22 notice of newspapers:
200 feibe sue of 500S DV
1 greatest rits were 11: OTT • After he (the Kushad read to her - Toca Gap, w: IN ters of intercepat, be sous uti the present boos opeos vas 3060e diurnals, and speer bes, ad ir kt, H le boetet, was wir te were every day printed si Loodul
Tbe so a Te WC
to be was eibt Tears be After the Restoration, be speaks I tast
pesteel is 18.00 a bote.mi: C1ers as —
de In lees, fast and the Gree TR
be bgan basists on tis own 3*:t as A tribe that had risen 20) TOU) TTD Con rastera de sbp - Se Mas well's time, an] Dere were lichid sunt ce ter at the corner of Coma Luclate trullies, tiwbes the wide truit of
bari treet The + of A::..” ==, money be passed tervezt she hands of the scriveners.
cartzgrib it a pornit
E. barze coetane in ce case He thinks it Deressary to explain the wind farms for more than a eterary, idé toutes * million" as often as be uses it braig bai come to be su -TEIT OS but it in a parenthesis, - Teo toi buus: ir api in paper.* thai iker wiki
In concludib? a Draise of Cardia's mile. Gar vas the DOS History of the Ribeiro Sobe se ass, we several borists who sur. gave a specim-n of his Oratos insti:
Bri: H. quenre. We will evocare this one of its ined" si Marian his Life
, which is far from being an tir.senestery detridestal to the need book, with a spimes of the race but netu se to bosna z wars clumsiness into flicha be bacaan awed ad means were derises to be himself to slide sben be wrue bocer vrata potisse ihre special excitement As a cine to be les bases Dons by the great stirnes 29è pens rinth, we may become that is rutins, trade so great grens tui reant that Lord Falub derrisdi Pesikia anteporzitt! that Mr. Corestry sorrei:
seat with their interest." GoTo
19terest to abandon the trade TETET Earl of Famedai V. CT ile a compromise wil toe B fals wbo sbro Lite Dunsport i and maine leare 10 prst B ke, wbor Boreal ire Ear v1.21.21: Lain wit types portes ou er the uits LLS, #bycoon P: Tbt*tjy ke soon gewrit. N. humi sobliged 3:1 t. III.222.21 Estrusts ibe con un tries of his ft.n. who con mac Pes
Ds, azd fs is limits of Kastri five " wbos in Tess ls der in the aber stories to identi
Ebe DS sropas trupin." Het to a disertai cindest and Coresins; 2. tur og as cb-apls as be coci) the parts
Le mie a test part of Lis
w which it was the C25
et at something ske ibes rea' Tulae
Anne's Guy dodir etrist hins From the ExxLUI.
ply by the sale of Bli, ar 1 set my eller. By Charles by invei: z tbe por f1s of that made it ibe
uring of Govert bat sok and other
lawin' ways of makitg mody on'( !.ang ree fason: barber. In 1726 be st 41 m. in bayior South the de 20 of Scatoka: 12 for the lonare He
is worse, received for the most part their infor. | tween the King and the Parliament, and mations and advertisements from clergymen took part emphatically and passionately for who understand the least, and take the worst the King; and this although, in the earlier measure of human affairs of all mankind that
part of his career, he was as well aware as can write and read.
any one of the existence of great abuses
which required a remedy. All study of It is easy to trace in this celebrated pas- that period leads to the conclusion that the sage the inward satisfaction with which real question was the question of sovereignClarendon contrasted his own social advan- ty. Was the King or the Parliament to be tages with the somewhat narrow education the substantive or the adjective? Clarenof Laud. His own temper apparently had don took the Royal side, perhaps, all the something of the same sort of roughness in more warmly because he had sufficient it, for he continually boasts of bis habitual faith in it to wish to reform collateral abusplainness of speech. The following account es, like the Courts of the Earl Marshal and ot' himself is one of the oddest passages that those of the President of the North, and the ever were written:
Council of Wales. He appears really and
honestly to have believed that it was an evHe was in his nature inclined to pride and erlasting divine decree that the King and passion, and to a humour between wrangling the Bishops should direct, substantially and and disputing, very troublesome; which good really, all the temporal and spiritual affairs company in a short tiine so much reformed and of the nation, and that it was in the highest mastered, that no man was more attable and courteous to all kinds of persons ; and they degree morally wicked, and even impious, who knew the great infirmity of his whole to try to alter this arrangement. Nothing family, which abounded in passion, used to say is more difficult for us, at this distance of he had much extinguished the unruliness of time, to realize than the view which in that fire. That which supported and rendered those days a man like Clarendon took of a him generally acceptable was his generosity man like Hampden. What Hampden (for he had too much a contempt of money), thought of Clarendon we do not know, but and the opinion men had of the goodness and Clarendon obviously considered Hampden justice of his nature which was transcendent as a wicked man, a rebel, a traitor, and a in him, in a wonderful tenderness and delight
his in obliging. His integrity was ever without hypocrite. In a curious summary blemish, and believed to be above temptation. life with which the book concludes, he says, He was firm and unshaken in his friendships; in language too ample for quotation, that and though he had great candour towards oth he began by “so great a tenderness and ers in the differences of religion, he was zealous- love towards mankind” that he believed ly and deliberately fixed in the principles both every one to be virtuous, but that his · Parof the doctrine and discipline of the Church. liamentary experience soon taught him that
upon whose ingenuity and probity he Few men have sung their own praises with would willingly have deposited all his consuch calm assurance. A person who says, cernments of this world” totally “Upon mature reflection, I pronounce my- false and disingenuous;" that “
“ religion self to be a man of transcendent goodness was made a cloak to cover the most impious and justice, wonderful tenderness, unblem- designs, and reputation of honesty a strataished integrity, a firm friend, and as candid gem to deceive and cheat others who had as I am strict in my religious views,” must no mind to be wicked.” It is true that he really be a sort of phenomenon. In every adds that the Court was “ as full of murmurpart of his autobiography Clarendon shows ing, ingratitude, and treachery against the à solid, deliberate admiration of himself, best and most bountiful master in the world which it seems hardly fair to call vanity, as the country and the city;” but scores of because it is so calm and grave, but which, passages might easily be quoted from his so far as we know, is unrivalled by any oth- works which show that he was utterly uner writer.
able to believe that the Parliamentary party The great blemish of the early part of could have any conscientious belief at all in the Memoirs is that they throw very little their own principles. This intense zeal is light either upon the logical groundwork of the more difficult to explain because he Clarendon's earlier life or on the nature of stood almost alone in it. "Falkland, for inhis change. Perhaps the most plausible stance, was obviously in great doubt as to guess — for, after all, it is little more that the course which he had taken; but percan be made - as to bis frame of mind, is haps the most curious case was that of Sir that he was one of the very few who clearly Edmund Verney, the standard-bearer. On understood the nature of the struggle be- | the march to Edge Hill he complimented