CHAPTER VIII. 1745-1749. "Miscellaneous Observations on Macbeth," and "Proposals for a new Edition of Shaks Feare Prologue, spoken by Garrick, on the opening of Drury Lane Theatre"Prospectus of the Dictionary of the English Language-Progress of the Work-King's Head Club in Ivy Lane-Visit to Tunbridge Wells-"Life of Roscommon "-" Preface to Dodsley's Preceptor"-" Vision of Theodore the Hermit "_"The Vanity of Human Wishes ❞— "Irene" acted at Drury Lane. IN 1745, he published a pamphlet entitled, "Miscellaneous Observations on the Tragedy of Macbeth, with Remarks on Sir T. H.'s (Sir Thomas Hanmer's) Edition of Shakspeare," to which he affixed, Proposals for a new edition of that poet. As we do not trace anything else published by him during the course of this year, we may conjecture that he was occupied entirely with that work. But the little encouragement which was given by the public to his anonymous proposals for the execution of a task which Warburton was known to have undertaken, probably damped his ardour. His pamphlet, however, was highly esteemed, and was fortunate enough to obtain the approbation even of the supercilious Warburton himself, who, in the Preface to his Shakspeare, pubished two years afterwards, thus mentioned it : "As to all those things which have been published under the titles of Essays, Remarks, Observations, etc., on Shakspeare, if you except some Critical Notes on Macbeth, given as a specimen of a projected edition, and written, as appears, by a man of parts and genius, the rest are absolutely below a serious notice." Of this flattering distinction shown to him by Warburton, a very grateful remembrance was ever entertained by Johnson, who said, "He praised me at a time when praise was of value to me." In 1746, it is probable that he was still employed upon his Shakspeare, which perhaps he laid aside for a time, upon account of the high expectations which were formed of Warburton's edition of that great poet. It is somewhat curious, that his literary career appears to have been almost totally suspended in the years 1745 and 1746, those years which were marked by a civil war in Great Britain, when a rash attempt was made to restore the House of Stuart to the throne. That he had a tenderness for that unfortu nate House, is well known; and some may fancifully imagine, that a sympathetic anxiety impeded the exertion of his intellectual powers:' but I am inclined to think that he was, during this time, sketching the outlines of his great philological work. None of his letters during those years, are extant, so far as I can discover. This is much to be regretted. It might afford some entertainment to see how he then expressed himself to his private friends concerning State affairs. Dr. Adams informs me, that "at this time a favourite object which he had in contemplation was 'The Life of Alfred;' in which, from the warmth with which he spoke about it, he would, I believe, had he been master of his own will, engaged himself, rather than on any other subject." In 1747, it is supposed that the Gentleman's Magazine for May was enriched by him with five short poetical pieces, distinguished by three asterisks. The first is a translation, or rather a paraphrase, of a Latin Epitaph on Sir Thomas Hanmer. Whether the Latin was his or not, I have never heard, though I should think it probably was, if it be certain that he wrote the English; as to which my only cause of doubt is, that his slighting the character of Hanmer as an editor, in his "Observations on Macbeth," is very different from that in the Epitaph. It may be said, that there is the same contrariety between the character in the Observations, and that in his own Preface to Shakspeare; but a considerable time elapsed between the one publication and the other, whereas, the Observations and the Epitaph came close together. The others are, "To Miss on her giving the Author a gold and silk network Purse of her own weaving;" "Stella in Mourning;" "The In the Garrick Correspondence, there is a letter from Gilbert Walmesley, dated Nov. 8, 1746, which contains this passage:-" When you see Mr. Johnson, pray give my compliments, and tell him I esteem him as a great genius-quite lost, both to himself and the world.' Upon which the Editor observes, "It is obvious that Walmesley had been anxiously expectng from his friend, performances adequate to his powers, but at length almost despaired, that ae could ever be roused to useful strenuous exertion of his time." Winter's Walk;" "An Ode;" and, "To Lyce, an elderly Lady." I am not positive that all these were his productions;' but as The Winter's Walk" has never been controverted to be his, and all of them have the same mark, it is reasonable to conclude that they are all written by the same hand. Yet to the Ode, in which we find a passage very characteristic of him, being a learned description of the gout, "Unhappy, whom to beds of pain, there is the following note, "The author being ill of the gout :" but Johnson was not attacked with that distemper till a very late period of his life. May not this, however, be a poetical fiction? Why may not a poet suppose himself to have the gout, as well as to suppose himself to be in love, of which we have innumerable instances, and which has been admirably ridiculed by Johnson in his "Life of Cowley?" I have also some difficulty to believe that he could produce such a group of conceits as appear in the verses to Lyce, in which he claims for this ancient personage as good a right to be assimilated to heaven, as nymphs whom other poets have flattered; he therefore ironically ascribes to her the attributes of the sky, in such stanzas as this: 1 In the "Universal Visiter," to which Johnson contributed, the mark which is affixed to some pieces unquestionably his, is also found subjoined to others, of which he certainly was not the author. The mark, therefore, will not ascertain the poems in question to have been written by him. Some of them were probably the productions of Hawkesworth, who, it is believed, was afflicted with the gout. The verses on a Purse were inserted afterwards, in Mrs. Williams's Miscellanies, and are, unquestionably, Johnson's."-MALONE. There is no evidence whatever that any of these were Johnson's, and every reason to suppose that they are Hawkesworth's. The ode which Boswell doubts about, on internal evidence, is the ode to Spring, which, with those on Summer, Autumn, and Winter, have been of late published as Johnson's, and are, no doubt, all by the same hand. We see that Spring bears internal marks of being Hawkesworth's. Winter and Summer, Mr. Chalmers asserts to be his also, and the index to the Gent. Mag. for 1748 attributes Summer to Mr. Greville, a name known to have been assumed by Hawkesworth. The verses on the "Purse," and to "Stella in Mourning," are certainly by the same hand as the four odes. The whole must therefore be assigned to Hawkesworth, and should be removed from their place in Johnson's works.-CROKER. But as, at a very advanced age, he could condescend to trifle in namby-pamby rhymes, to please Mrs. Thrale and her daughter, he may have, in his earlier years, composed such a piece as this. It is remarkable, that in this first edition of "The Winter's Walk," the concluding line is much more Johnsonian than it was afterwards printed; for in subsequent editions, after praying Stella to “snatch him to her arms," he says, "And shield me from the ills of life." Whereas in the first edition it is "And hide me from the sight of life.' A horror of life in general is more consonant with Johnson's habitua. gloomy cast of thought.' I have heard him repeat with great energy the following verses, which appeared in the Gentleman's Magazine for April this year; but I have no authority to say they were his own. Indeed, one of the best critics of our age suggests to me, that "the word indifferently being used in the sense of without concern, and being also very unpoetical, renders it improbable that they should have been his composition." ON LORD LOVAT'S EXECUTION. "Pitied by gentle minds KILMARNOCK died; The honest mourn not, knowing him a knave!"1 Johnson's habitual horror was not of life, but of death.-CROKER. These verses are somewhat too severe on the extraordinary person who is the chief This year his old pupil and friend, David Garrick, having become joint patentee and manager of Drury Lane theatre, Johnson hon oured his opening of it with a Prologue,* which, for just and manly dramatic criticism on the whole range of the English stage, as well as for poetical excellence, is unrivalled. Like the celebrated Epilogue to the "Distressed Mother," it was, during the season, often called for by the audience. The most striking and brilliant passages of it have been so often repeated, and are so well recollected by all the lovers. of the drama and of poetry, that it would be superfluous to point them out. In the Gentleman's Magazine for December this year, he inserted an "Ode on Winter," which is, I think, an admirable speci men of his genius for lyric poetry. But the year 1747 is distinguished as the epoch when Johnson's arduous and important work, his "DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE," was announced to the world, by the publication of its Plan or Prospectus. How long this immense undertaking had been the object of his contemplation, I do not know. I once asked him by what means he had attained to that astonishing knowledge of our language, by which he was enabled to realise a design of such extent and accumulated difficulty. He told me, that "it was not the effect of particular study; but that it had grown up in his mind insensibly." I have been informed by Mr. James Dodsley, that several years before this period, when Johnson was one day sitting in his brother Robert's shop, he heard his brother suggest to him, that a Dictionary of the English Language would be a work that would be well received by the public; that Johnson seemed at first to catch at the Sgure in them; for he was, undoubtedly, brave. His pleasantry during his solemn trial (in which, by the way, I have heard Mr. David Hume observe, that we have one of the very few speeches of Mr. Murray, now Earl of Mansfield, authentically given) was very remarkable. When asked if he had any questions to put to Sir Everard Fawkener, who was one of the strongest witnesses against him, he answered, "I only wish him joy of his young wife." And after sentence of death, in the horrible terms in such cases of treason, was pronounced upon him, as he was retiring from the bar, he said, "Fare you well, my lords, we shall not all meet again in one place." He behaved with perfect composure at his execution, and called out, "Dulce et decorum est pro patriâ mori.”—BOSWELL. "There are but two decent prologues in our tongue,-Pope's to Cato-Johnson's Drury Lane. These, with the epilogue to the 'Distressed Mother,' and, I think, one of Goldsmith's, and a prologue of old Colman's to Beaumont and Fletcher's Philaster, are the best things of the kind we have."-BYRON. |