Department of Energy's Initial Efforts to Implement the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982: Report to the CongressU.S. General Accounting Office, 1985 - 85 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 15
Page ii
... testing Repository siting statutory deadlines First repository Second repository 4/7/83 Not spec- ified Not spec- ified 7/1/89 1/1/85 7/1/89 President recommends 3/31/87 3/31/90 1 site for reposi- tory development The Secretary of ...
... testing Repository siting statutory deadlines First repository Second repository 4/7/83 Not spec- ified Not spec- ified 7/1/89 1/1/85 7/1/89 President recommends 3/31/87 3/31/90 1 site for reposi- tory development The Secretary of ...
Page iii
... tests and more recent estimates of the time needed for this testing , DOE estimates that the President would not be in a position to recommend the first repository site until after June 1990. ( See pp . 21 to 22. ) FINANCING THE PROGRAM ...
... tests and more recent estimates of the time needed for this testing , DOE estimates that the President would not be in a position to recommend the first repository site until after June 1990. ( See pp . 21 to 22. ) FINANCING THE PROGRAM ...
Page 10
... tests . The three sites are : Yucca Mountain in Nevada ; Deaf Smith in Texas ; and the Cold Creek Syncline ( Hanford ) in Washington . The evaluations which form the basis for DOE's preliminary deter- mination are subject to a 90 - day ...
... tests . The three sites are : Yucca Mountain in Nevada ; Deaf Smith in Texas ; and the Cold Creek Syncline ( Hanford ) in Washington . The evaluations which form the basis for DOE's preliminary deter- mination are subject to a 90 - day ...
Page 11
... testing . Given the prepara- tory work done on these evaluations , DOE had expected to meet the January 1 , 1985 , statutory deadline for recommending three sites . However , OCRWM officials told us early in October 1984 that , due ...
... testing . Given the prepara- tory work done on these evaluations , DOE had expected to meet the January 1 , 1985 , statutory deadline for recommending three sites . However , OCRWM officials told us early in October 1984 that , due ...
Page 12
... testing program . Moreover , we noted several additional matters that could further affect DOE's ability to timely complete repository siting activities . These relate to concerns by DOE and others about the effects on DOE's schedule of ...
... testing program . Moreover , we noted several additional matters that could further affect DOE's ability to timely complete repository siting activities . These relate to concerns by DOE and others about the effects on DOE's schedule of ...
Expressions et termes fréquents
accelerate payments addition annual appropriate authority basalt Battelle Memorial Institute budget characterization Civilian Radioactive Waste Congress construction contractor Deaf Smith County defense high-level waste defense waste deferred payments Director disposal fee disposal of defense Division DOE believes DOE's established evaluate facility fee collection procedures financing fiscal year 1985 geologic disposal geologic repositories highly radioactive materials implementing inflation interest rates Interim Storage January 31 July June 30 kilowatt-hour million Nevada nuclear electricity nuclear utilities Nuclear Waste Fund Nuclear Waste Policy NWPA requires OCRWM Office of Civilian one-time fee ongoing fee Operations Office options percent President program costs Project Office Radioactive Waste Management reactors recommend repository development repository siting reprocessed requires DOE responsible revenues second repository Secretary of Energy siting guidelines specific spent fuel spent nuclear fuel staff Swisher County tion Treasury Treasury securities waste disposal Waste Policy Act York Yucca Mountain
Fréquemment cités
Page 70 - The presence of the restricted area or the repository support facilities would conflict irreconcilably with the previously designated resourcepreservation use of a component of the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Wilderness Preservation System, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, or National Forest Lands, or any comparably significant State protected resource that was dedicated to resource preservation at the time of the enactment of the Act.
Page 74 - Act to provide for the development of repositories for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel...
Page 70 - Potential for major disruptions of primary sectors of the economy of the affected area. (d) Disqualifying condition. A site shall be disqualified if repository construction, operation, or closure would significantly degrade the quality, or significantly reduce the quantity, of water from major sources of offsite supplies presently suitable for human consumption or crop irrigation and such impacts cannot be compensated for, or mitigated by, reasonable measures.
Page 71 - ... (d) Disqualifying Condition. A site shall be disqualified if, based on the expected nature and rates of fault movement or other ground motion, it is likely that engineering measures that are beyond reasonably available technology will be required for exploratoryshaft construction or for repository construction, operation, or closure.
Page 7 - State and public participation in the planning and development of repositories is essential in order to promote public confidence in the safety of disposal of such waste and spent fuel...
Page 71 - ... (d) Disqualifying condition. A site shall be disqualified if, based on expected ground-water conditions, it is likely that engineering measures that are beyond reasonably available technology will be required for exploratoryshaft construction or for repository construction, operation, or closure.
Page 70 - During repository siting, construction, operation, closure, or decommissioning the quality of the environment in the affected area could not be adequately protected or projected environmental impacts in the affected area could not be mitigated to an acceptable degree, taking into account programmatic, technical, social, economic, and environmental factors. (2) Any part of the restricted area or repository support facilities would be located within the boundaries of a component of the National Park...
Page 3 - Federal efforts during the past 30 years to devise a permanent solution to the problems of civilian radioactive waste disposal have not been adequate...
Page 71 - ... during repository operation. (5) Existing faults, shear zones, pressurized brine pockets, dissolution effects, or other stratigraphic or structural features that could compromise the safety of repository personnel because of water inflow or construction problems. (d) Disqualifying Condition.
Page 70 - ... Projected major conflict with applicable Federal, State, or local environmental requirements. (2) Projected significant adverse environmental impacts that cannot be avoided or mitigated. (3) Proximity to, or projected significant adverse environmental impacts of the repository or its support facilities on, a component of the National Park System...