Department of Energy's Initial Efforts to Implement the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982: Report to the CongressU.S. General Accounting Office, 1985 - 85 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 21
Page i
... material unless the President finds that a separate repository is required for the disposal of such defense wastes . Tear Sheet i GAO / RCED - 85-27 JANUARY 10 , 1985 earlier collection of millions of dollars in user fees ,
... material unless the President finds that a separate repository is required for the disposal of such defense wastes . Tear Sheet i GAO / RCED - 85-27 JANUARY 10 , 1985 earlier collection of millions of dollars in user fees ,
Page ii
Report to the Congress United States. General Accounting Office. earlier collection of millions of dollars in user fees , GAO makes specific recommendations to the Secretary of Energy to reexamine pro- gram financing arrangements ...
Report to the Congress United States. General Accounting Office. earlier collection of millions of dollars in user fees , GAO makes specific recommendations to the Secretary of Energy to reexamine pro- gram financing arrangements ...
Page iv
... collection and payment of fees , under which DOE shall begin to make dis- posal services available for commercial spent fuel by January 31 , 1998 -- the first reposi- tory's scheduled start - up date . In GAO's view , the contracts ...
... collection and payment of fees , under which DOE shall begin to make dis- posal services available for commercial spent fuel by January 31 , 1998 -- the first reposi- tory's scheduled start - up date . In GAO's view , the contracts ...
Page v
... collection procedures and / or plans , GAO found that DOE may be able to accelerate millions of dollars in payments from anticipated users of its waste disposal services . --For utilities generating nuclear electricity , DOE could seek ...
... collection procedures and / or plans , GAO found that DOE may be able to accelerate millions of dollars in payments from anticipated users of its waste disposal services . --For utilities generating nuclear electricity , DOE could seek ...
Page vii
... collection of more detailed cost data on program subactivi- ties . ( See pp . 63 to 66. ) AGENCY COMMENTS DOE believes that the report presents a fair and balanced assessment of its progress in im- plementing the act . DOE commented ...
... collection of more detailed cost data on program subactivi- ties . ( See pp . 63 to 66. ) AGENCY COMMENTS DOE believes that the report presents a fair and balanced assessment of its progress in im- plementing the act . DOE commented ...
Expressions et termes fréquents
accelerate payments addition annual appropriate authority basalt Battelle Memorial Institute budget characterization Civilian Radioactive Waste Congress construction contractor Deaf Smith County defense high-level waste defense waste deferred payments Director disposal fee disposal of defense Division DOE believes DOE's established evaluate facility fee collection procedures financing fiscal year 1985 geologic disposal geologic repositories highly radioactive materials implementing inflation interest rates Interim Storage January 31 July June 30 kilowatt-hour million Nevada nuclear electricity nuclear utilities Nuclear Waste Fund Nuclear Waste Policy NWPA requires OCRWM Office of Civilian one-time fee ongoing fee Operations Office options percent President program costs Project Office Radioactive Waste Management reactors recommend repository development repository siting reprocessed requires DOE responsible revenues second repository Secretary of Energy siting guidelines specific spent fuel spent nuclear fuel staff Swisher County tion Treasury Treasury securities waste disposal Waste Policy Act York Yucca Mountain
Fréquemment cités
Page 70 - The presence of the restricted area or the repository support facilities would conflict irreconcilably with the previously designated resourcepreservation use of a component of the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Wilderness Preservation System, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, or National Forest Lands, or any comparably significant State protected resource that was dedicated to resource preservation at the time of the enactment of the Act.
Page 74 - Act to provide for the development of repositories for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel...
Page 70 - Potential for major disruptions of primary sectors of the economy of the affected area. (d) Disqualifying condition. A site shall be disqualified if repository construction, operation, or closure would significantly degrade the quality, or significantly reduce the quantity, of water from major sources of offsite supplies presently suitable for human consumption or crop irrigation and such impacts cannot be compensated for, or mitigated by, reasonable measures.
Page 71 - ... (d) Disqualifying Condition. A site shall be disqualified if, based on the expected nature and rates of fault movement or other ground motion, it is likely that engineering measures that are beyond reasonably available technology will be required for exploratoryshaft construction or for repository construction, operation, or closure.
Page 7 - State and public participation in the planning and development of repositories is essential in order to promote public confidence in the safety of disposal of such waste and spent fuel...
Page 71 - ... (d) Disqualifying condition. A site shall be disqualified if, based on expected ground-water conditions, it is likely that engineering measures that are beyond reasonably available technology will be required for exploratoryshaft construction or for repository construction, operation, or closure.
Page 70 - During repository siting, construction, operation, closure, or decommissioning the quality of the environment in the affected area could not be adequately protected or projected environmental impacts in the affected area could not be mitigated to an acceptable degree, taking into account programmatic, technical, social, economic, and environmental factors. (2) Any part of the restricted area or repository support facilities would be located within the boundaries of a component of the National Park...
Page 3 - Federal efforts during the past 30 years to devise a permanent solution to the problems of civilian radioactive waste disposal have not been adequate...
Page 71 - ... during repository operation. (5) Existing faults, shear zones, pressurized brine pockets, dissolution effects, or other stratigraphic or structural features that could compromise the safety of repository personnel because of water inflow or construction problems. (d) Disqualifying Condition.
Page 70 - ... Projected major conflict with applicable Federal, State, or local environmental requirements. (2) Projected significant adverse environmental impacts that cannot be avoided or mitigated. (3) Proximity to, or projected significant adverse environmental impacts of the repository or its support facilities on, a component of the National Park System...