Pagina-afbeeldingen
PDF
ePub

gentleman, he was not justified in stating, what might possibly be the consequences of a refusal on the part of Denmark, or to advert to any other topics to induce Mr. Rist to make the application to his court. As to what had passed between the courts of Stockholin and Copenhagen, after the capitulation of Zealand, Mr. Sheridan must be aware, that such correspondence could never be produced to that house.-Mr. S. had justly stated, that we had but one ally remaining, and that him we had brought into a situation of great peril. And what was the cure he proposed? what the acknowledgment of his fidelity? That we should lay before the public the whole of his most intimate counsels, not with respect to dangers long past, but to perils actually impending, and which would be greatly aggravated by the production of the correspondence now moved for.

Mr. Canning, in the course of this speech remarked, that there was a very "observable sympathy between the gentlemen in opposition to him and his colleagues, and the French newspaper called the Moniteur. No sooner than they were run dry by a debate, than a number of the Moniteur arrived to supply them with a fresh topic. When their light was quite exhausted on any question, in came a Moniteur, from which a spark fell upon the gloom, and rekindled the heat of their arguments."

This drew a smart reply from Mr. Ponsonby, who, though sensible of the just rebuke of the right honourable secretary upon himself, and those on the same side with him, that they were grown dry in the debate, that they were

quite exhausted in language, and required the promethean fire of the Moniteur to rekindle them into activity, could never admit that any such imputation could be fixed on the right honourable secretary himself. His ideas were not so numerous, but that they could in a moment be put in array. The man who had but few ideas could readily summon them into action, particularly, when by perpetual practice they were drilled in all the evolutions of the disputant. The right honourable secretary was such an economist in his thoughts, and such a prodigal in words, that he could feel no embarrassment in debate. He could upon any occasion bring forward that chain of words which jingles in the ear, rarely affects the understanding, and never approaches the heart; but which some partizans might call eloquence. Mr. Ponsonby proceeded to animadvert on various parts of Mr. Canning's speech.— The conduct of ministers in negotiating with Sweden for the occupation of Zealand after it should be apparently evacuated, in conformity with the capitulation, excited his astonishment. It exactly resembled the conduct of two highwaymen, one of whom should first address a passenger, demanding his money, and threaten his life, and the passenger offer his purse, but beg that his life might be spared; on this, the highwayman accepts his purse, and promises not to injure him; but the moment he walks off, he whistles his companion from the hedge, and says, "Do you dispatch him."

Mr. Windham said, the character of the country had been seriously accused, and to that accusation

Mr.

Mr. Canning had returned a mere assertion in which, as usual, he was confident just in proportion as he was deficient in proof and argument. He had stated, that even were the papers applied for laid before the house, the gentlemen who supported the motion would not find what they wanted. They wanted some proofs to contradict the statements which appeared in the Moniteur, and to vindicate the character of the country: which would be very imperfectly vindicated indeed, if it rested on the mere assertion of the right honourable gentleman. If he thought the papers would support his assertion, was it not natural to infer that he would produce them? And was it not equally natural to infer the contrary from the pertinacity of his refusal? He took a view of the animadversions which had appeared in the Moniteur, and maintained that they were in some parts particularly just, though not expressed in very happy terms.

The earl of Temple thought the matter under consideration might be decided by a single question Was there, or was there not any negotiation with Sweden, or any other foreign power, to occupy Zealand after our troops were bound to evacuate it?

Mr. Canning repeated, that it was the determined purpose of ministers to evacuate Zealand, and li terally according to the capitulation: but when he said literally, he meant not according to the let ter, but the spirit of the capitulation. The doubts entertained by ministers as to the construction of that capitulation, would not be considered as unreasonable by any can did man, who looked back to the

period at which it took place, and who reflected, that it was concluded in the utter ignorance of the declaration of war by the Danish go

vernment.

Lord Temple said, the question was, whether it was proposed to any other power to occupy Zealand, after our troops should have evacuated it?

Mr. Canning asked, if the noble lord meant to enquire, whether after all hopes of a termination of the war with Denmark had ceased, ministers had it in contemplation, or had actually provided to take any hostile steps against that country?

The question having been loudly and repeatedly called for, the house divided.-For Mr. Sheridan's motion 85; against it 184.

House of Lords, March 3.-The earl of Darnley, after a suitable preface, moved that an humble address be presented to his majesty,

"That after attentively considering all the public documents before us concerning the late attack on Copenhagen, and the war which it has produced, we have found the information which they afford extremely imperfect and unsatisfactory.

"That in a matter in which both the honour and the interests of our country are so deeply concerned, we had hoped for the fullest explanations. The principles of our constitution, and the uniform practice of his majesty, and the sovereigns of his illustrious house, require that parliament should be distinctly apprized of the true grounds of entering into new wars, especially in a situation of our country wholly unprecedented.

"Had Denmark been a party to

any

any hostile confederacy against the rights or interests of the British empire, our resistance would have been necessary, and our warfare legitimate. Under such circum stances, we should only have had to regret, that the ports and arsenals of that country should so lightly have been abandoned, when advantages so very considerable had been derived from their temporary occupation; and when, by our continuing to hold them during the war, all real danger from that quarter might have been effectually averted.

"But we cannot doubt that Denmark, instead of engaging in hostile leagues, had resolved still to maintain her neutrality. This fact is proved even by the imperfect do. cuments which have been laid before us, and is confirmed by the proclamation issued by his majesty's commanders immediately before the attack.

"Certainly Denmark was no party, nor does it appear that she was privy to any confederacy hostile to this country. We are not even satisfied that such a league did really exist.

"The conclusion of any secret articles at Tilsit, affecting the rights or interests of the British empire, appears to have been uniformly denied both by Russia and France.

"The correspondence of his majesty's secretary of state, and the dates of the transactions them selves, prove that his majesty's ministers could not be in possession of anysuch articles, when the attack was ordered against Copenhagen; and it has been distinctly admitted in this house, that they have not yet obtained a copy of them.

"The king's ambassador at PeVOL. L.

tersburgh, in an official note, rested the defence of the measures not on any hostile purposes either of Denmark or Russia, but solely on the designs, which it was said, the French government had long since been known to entertain.

"His majesty's ministers not on. ly forebore to advise such measures as would have been necessary to repel any real hostility of Russia, but they actually solicited the mediation of that power to extinguish a war, and her guarantee to defeat projects in which it is now pretended they knew her to have been a principal and contracting party.

"Allegations thus inconsistent with each other, and contrary to admitted facts, weaken, instead of supporting, the cause to which they are applied.

With respect to the alleged necessity of the case, we beg leave to assure his majesty, that we cannot think so meanly of the power and resources of his empire, of the spirit of his people, or of the valour and discipline of his fleets and armies, as to admit that such an act could have been required for any purpose of self-preservation.

"Any temporary advantages which the possession of such ships and stores as were taken at Copenhagen can afford, are already much more than counterbalanced by the other consequences of a measure, which appears not less objectionable in policy than in principle. That measure has augmented the number of our enemies; it has countenanced the injurious representations circulated throughout Europe respecting our principles and designs; and has inflamed against us the warmest passions of neutral and of friendly nations. [E]

"But

[ocr errors]

"But it has, above all, shaken our own persuasion of the justice of our cause a sentiment which had hitherto supported us through all our difficulties; commanding the respect of other powers, and encouraging us in an humble but confident reliance on the ultimate protection and blessing of Providence. "Unwilling as we are even yet to pronounce definitively on a subject, the full knowledge of which has been so pertinaciously withheld from us; and reluctant as we must ever be to admit conclusions unfavourable to the justice of those counsels by which his majesty's conduct has been actuated; we are yet compelled, on such an occasion, to speak to his majesty the language of truth. And we must, therefore, with all humility, and with the most unfeigned and heartfelt sorrow, represent, that in a case which, above all others, required the clearest proof, every presumption is against us; and that no partiele of evidence has yet been adduced by which our national character can be vindicated from the guilt of an unprovoked and premeditated violation of that good faith, justice, and humanity, which have hitherto been at once the glory and the safeguard of the British empire."

The address proposed by the earl of Darnley was supported by lord Holland, and opposed by the lords Elliot and Boringdon.-The house divided. For the motion 51-Against it 110.

After this, Lord Elliot moved for an address to his majesty, stating, That this house, considering the declaration laid before them by his majesty's command; the state to which the continent was reduced, in consequence of the negotiation

and peace of Tilsit; the avowed declaration of the French government, to exclude the British flag from every port of Europe, and to combine all the powers of the continent in a general confederacy, against the maritime rights, and political existence of Great Britain, most highly approve the prompt and vigorous measures adopted by his majesty's ministers, for the purpose of removing out of the reach of his enemies, the fleet and naval resources of Denmark,” The house divided. For the motion 125-Against it 57.

House of Lords, March 7.— Viscount Sidmouth called theirlordships' attention to a subject of great importance. He had heard that when a rumour prevailed of an intended attack upon Copenhagen, a representation had been made to government on behalf of the Danish vessels then in our ports, for the purpose of ascertaining, whether they were safe in completing their cargoes. The nature of this representation, or the answer to it, he did not know. But afterwards, intimation having been made by the chamber of commerce at Copenhagen, that there was no expectation of hostilities with this country, those vessels proceeded to complete their cargoes. Previously, however, to the sailing of the expedition, an order was issued, under which all those vessels were detained, and others brought in, the whole of which he had heard were since condemned, and become droits of admiralty. The produce of these vessels and cargoes, he had heard, amounted to nearly 2,000,000l. If these statements were true, he could not help think ing the circumstances unexampled

in the annals of the country. Unless he had farther information, he must ever believe, that our expedition to Copenhagen caused the war with Denmark, and, therefore, that the vessels previously detained, ought to have been considered in a different situation from vessels detained in consequence of the previous hostile power to which they belonged. He wished to ask the noble secretary of state, whether it was true, that the vessels he had alluded to had been condemned in the manner stated, and also, whether the crews were detained as prisoners of war?

Lord Hawkesbury stated, that the same course had been adopted with respect to the Danish vessels, as had been adopted with respect to the vessels of other powers detained in similar circumstances. No assurance of protection had been given either directly or indirectly by government to the Danish vessels in our ports, at the time mentioned by the noble lord. As to the crews, they were as in other cases, detained prisoners of war, with the exception of some individuals, who had been, under particular circumstances, released, A cartel proposed to the Danish government had been hitherto declined. As to the value of the ships and cargoes it had been greatly exaggerated.

House of Commons, March 21. -The Baltic expedition was again brought into discussion by

Mr. Sharp, who considered all that had passed hitherto on this subject, as only preliminary to the sentence which the house would now be called upon to give. In a time of profound peace we bom barded the metropolis of a neutral

power, while all her ships were in port, and all her stores were in her arsenals. An act of this primâ facie injustice called for a frank exposition; and, indeed, in the words of his majesty's speech it was due to Europe and the world. But had it appeared that ministers had not resorted to this act of violence, as long as a doubt of Denmark's hostility, as long as a hope of her neutrality remained The grounds of justification had been threefold: First, the intention of France to seize upon Holstein, and to compel Denmark to depart from her neutrality secondly, the co-operation of Russia with France; and thirdly, the collusion of Denmark with France, and the latent conspiracy of three powers against the maritime rights of Great Britain. Having examined these three grounds, which appeared to him altogether unsatisfactory, he concluded a very animated and ingenious speech with moving,

"That an humble address be presented to his majesty, submitting to his majesty, that we have attentively considered all the information before us respecting the late attack on Copenhagen, and the war in which we have consequently been involved: and that we deeply lament to have found it imperfect, contradictory, and unsatisfactory, in all its parts.

"That respecting a transaction in which both the honour and the interests of our country are so deeply concerned, we had hopedfor the fullest explanation.

"That the principles of our constitution, and the uniform practice of his majesty and the sovereigns of his illustrious house, require that parliament should be distinctly

apprized

« VorigeDoorgaan »