Indian Point and NRC Safety Procedures: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session, on Oversight of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Safety Procedures and Their Application to the Safety Investigation of the Indian Point Nuclear Facility, Buchanan, N.Y., August 16, September 24, and October 1, 1982U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983 - 467 pages |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
accident at Indian agency ASLB Asselstine Atomic Safety believe Chairman Commis Con Edison consequences consider Consolidated Edison contentions core melt Croton-on-Hudson decision discussion Edison emergency planning evacuation plan Federal FEMA going groups guidance health and safety Indian Point hearings Indian Point nuclear Indian Point plants Indian Point proceeding Indian Point Unit intervenors investigation investigatory Judge CARTER July 27 order Licensing Board matter NRC staff NRC's nuclear plants nuclear power plants Nuclear Regulatory Commission NYPIRG O'TOOLE operation OTTINGER PALLADINO parties PASNY petition population preparedness probabilistic risk assessment probability problems procedures public confidence public participation questions radiological emergency reactor regulations response result risk assessment risks posed Rockland County role rules Safety and Licensing September 17 specific sponte statement sua sponte subcommittee testify testimony Three Mile Island tion Union of Concerned Westchester witnesses York City Zimmer
Fréquemment cités
Page 312 - ... a serious safety, environmental, or common defense and security matter was not raised by the parties, the board will determine such matter as being among the issues to be decided. Those issues will be specified in the notice of a hearing issued by the Commission, or in a prehearing conference order issued by the board in the exercise of its discretion during the hearing.
Page 216 - ... law on the matters put into controversy by the parties to the proceeding and on matters which have been determined to be the issues in the proceeding by the Commission or the presiding officer. Matters not put into controversy by the parties will be examined and decided by the presiding- officer only where he or she determines that a serious safety, environmental, or common defense and security matter exists.
Page 352 - Mr. Chairman. I would like to submit my written testimony for the record and will briefly summarize it here.
Page 4 - STATEMENT OF HON. HAMILTON FISH, JR., A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK Mr. FISH. Mr. Chairman, and gentlemen of the committee, I will be very brief.
Page 248 - shall include a reasoned consideration of the environmental risks (impacts) attributable to accidents at the particular facility or facilities . . . ."; "Approximately equal attention should be given to the probability of occurrence of releases and to the probability of occurrence of the environmental consequences . . . ."; and Such studies "will take into account significant site and plant-specific features . . . ." Thus, a description of a release scenario must include a discussion of the probability...
Page 15 - FEMA position should be taken as a rebuttable presumption for this estimate. 4. What improvements in the level of emergency planning can be expected in the near future, and on what time schedule, and are there other specific offsite emergency procedures that are feasible and should be taken to protect the public?
Page 32 - Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, December 1978.
Page 119 - In the Matter of CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC (Indian Point, Unit No. 2) POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF .NEW YORK (Indian Point, Unit No.
Page 268 - Report said, ii true in part because there is in many cases an inadequate data base, in part because of an inability to quantify common cause failures, and in part because of some questionable methodological and statistical procedures.
Page 119 - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges: Ivan W.