Military Construction Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1973: Joint Hearings Before the Subcommittees on Military Construction of the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, Ninety-second Congress, Second Session, onU.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - 573 pages |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 100
Page 20
... Command for the preponder- ance of our construction program . The Air Force , however , will handle $ 45 million of its own FY 1973 program , with design responsibilities for $ 23.6 mil- lion and total responsibility for an additional ...
... Command for the preponder- ance of our construction program . The Air Force , however , will handle $ 45 million of its own FY 1973 program , with design responsibilities for $ 23.6 mil- lion and total responsibility for an additional ...
Page 21
... command and control , and other operational facilities necessary to support the combat readiness capability of the Services . Under training facilities we seek to provide the instructional and training facilities necessary to the ...
... command and control , and other operational facilities necessary to support the combat readiness capability of the Services . Under training facilities we seek to provide the instructional and training facilities necessary to the ...
Page 22
... Command Post Facilities , $ 19.3 million ; and miscellaneous facili- ties . $ 2.4 million . Significant items within the training facilities include a Flight Indoctrination Complex at the USAF Academy , $ 2.5 million ; additions and ...
... Command Post Facilities , $ 19.3 million ; and miscellaneous facili- ties . $ 2.4 million . Significant items within the training facilities include a Flight Indoctrination Complex at the USAF Academy , $ 2.5 million ; additions and ...
Page 53
... Command ? That is , what is the difference ? Mr. SHILLITO . The charge systems are the same . The difference is that the Navy flat rate charge includes those costs associated with con- struction management at the headquarters of the ...
... Command ? That is , what is the difference ? Mr. SHILLITO . The charge systems are the same . The difference is that the Navy flat rate charge includes those costs associated with con- struction management at the headquarters of the ...
Page 55
... Command ? Wouldn't this to a large degree eliminate the need for flat rate charges for supervision , inspection , and overhead ? Mr. SHILLITO . There are really two different elements involved in your question , sir . The first is why ...
... Command ? Wouldn't this to a large degree eliminate the need for flat rate charges for supervision , inspection , and overhead ? Mr. SHILLITO . There are really two different elements involved in your question , sir . The first is why ...
Table des matières
529 | |
531 | |
533 | |
539 | |
542 | |
550 | |
552 | |
553 | |
431 | |
453 | |
469 | |
486 | |
493 | |
506 | |
509 | |
511 | |
520 | |
525 | |
528 | |
560 | |
565 | |
566 | |
567 | |
569 | |
570 | |
572 | |
i | |
iii | |
ix | |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
1973 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION activities additional adequate Admiral ENGER Admiral FISHER Agency Air Base Air Force Base Air National Guard aircraft airmen ammunition amount approved assigned authorization barracks building Calif Center Chairman Command Committee complete CONGRESS THE LIBRARY cost Department of Defense Depot ELLENDER engine equipment existing facilities family housing fiscal year 1973 FLIAKAS Fort Hood Fort Rucker funds Guam hospital improvements included increase installation Laboratory Logistics maintenance Marine Corps MCCONNELL ment miles military construction program million Missile mission modernization National Capital region NATO Naval Air Station Naval Station Navy Office operations percent pollution abatement present project will provide proposed quarters REILLY Reserve Sembach Air Base Senator SYMINGTON Senator YOUNG SHERIDAN SHILLITO Souda Bay space Squadron storage structures substandard support facilities Tactical tion U.S. Army units utilities Virginia Beach World War II
Fréquemment cités
Page 75 - The corridor cities concept recommended by the Year 2000 Plan, prepared by the National Capital Planning Commission and the National Capital Regional Planning Council in 1961, shall be supported by agencies of the executive branch as the basic development scheme for the National Capital Region.
Page 62 - This now has been approved by both the Chief of Naval Operations and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and, of course, the resulting interservice support agreement must be signed in the field.
Page 75 - Maryland; Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William Counties in Virginia; and all cities now or hereafter existing in Maryland or Virginia within the geographic area bounded by the outer boundaries of the combined area of said counties; (2) 'environs...
Page 117 - ... Services of the Senate and House of Representatives, immediately upon reaching a final decision to implement, of the cost of construction of any public work undertaken under this section, including those real estate actions pertaining thereto. This authorization will expire as of September 30...
Page 364 - The mission of the Strategic Air Command (SAC) is to organize, train, equip, administer, prepare and maintain a force in a state of readiness capable of conducting intensive and conclusive worldwide aerial bombardment against enemies of the United States. The program requests authorization of $40,522,000 for construction of facilities at 28 locations where SAC is the host command.
Page 145 - The term covers such varied items as air fields, air defense facilities, communications, missile sites, war headquarters, nuclear storage sites, pipelines, and POL depots. It does not normally cover general purpose depots, troop billets, and other...
Page 207 - US obligations during the fiscal year 1972 timeframe as projects in established categories are approved by the NATO Payments and Progress Committee for funding. Such projects are from a backlog of construction requirements previously approved in SACEUR and SACLANT annual programs.
Page 235 - FACT SHEET ON UNITED STATES NAVAL HOME Background and mission The mission of the US Naval Home is to provide an honorable and comfortable home for old and disabled personnel of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard (while operating as a part of the Navy), who are entitled to benefits of the institution.