 | 1986 - 448 pages
...systems of strategic defense are technically feasible. Second, a new treaty signed now would provide that if, after 1991, either side should decide to deploy...missiles. And this plan would be negotiated over a 2year period. Third, if the two sides can't agree after 2 years of negotiation, either side would be... | |
 | United States. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency - 1986 - 934 pages
...Second, a new treaty, signed now, would provide that if, after l99l, either side should decide to deploy a system, that side would be obliged to offer a plan...and for eliminating offensive ballistic missiles. This plan would be negotiated over a two year period. o Third, if the two sides cannot agree after... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1987 - 1722 pages
...President made in New York in the UN speech when he said a new treaty signed now would provide that if after 1991 either side should decide to deploy...and for eliminating offensive ballistic missiles. This plan would be negotiated over a 2-year period after 1991. That was sort of the general feeling... | |
 | 1987 - 42 pages
...repeated in Reagan's address to the United Nations on September 22, it was similarly vague: "* * * if, after 1991, either side should decide to deploy such a system [strategic defense], that side would be obliged to offer a plan for sharing the benefits of strategic... | |
 | Deborah Welch Larson - 2000 - 348 pages
...was permitted by the ABM Treaty. If either side then decided to deploy strategic defenses, it should offer a plan for sharing "the benefits of strategic defense" and for eliminating all ballistic missiles. If the two superpowers could not agree on how to destroy ballistic missiles... | |
 | Don Oberdorfer - 1998 - 1144 pages
...and (2) if either side wished to deploy strategic defenses after that, it would be required to submit a plan for sharing the benefits of strategic defense and for eliminating all ballistic missiles. There was never a formal meeting of the National Security Council at which... | |
 | James E. Goodby - 2006 - 244 pages
...of strategic defense are technically feasible. Second, a new treaty, signed now, would provide that if, after 1991, either side should decide to deploy...offer a plan for sharing the benefits of strategic defenses and for eliminating offensive ballistic missiles. And this plan would be negotiated over a... | |
 | 1991 - 896 pages
...systems of strategic defense are technically feasible. Second, a new treaty signed now would provide that if, after 1991 , either side should decide to deploy...missiles. And this plan would be negotiated over a 2-year period. Third, if the two sides can't agree after 2 years of negotiation, either side would... | |
| |
Second, a new treaty signed now would provide that if, after 1991, either side should decide to deploy such a system, that side would be obliged to offer a plan for sharing the benefits of strategic defense and for eliminating offensive ballistic missiles. 