 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1983 - 198 pages
...until now we have increasingly based our strategy of deterrence upon the threat. of retaliation. But what if free people could live secure In the knowledge...their security did not rest upon the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack; that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1983 - 190 pages
...of dollars and deploy it the way some people have suggested, the President, for example, said, but what if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest on the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could intercept and destroy... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1984 - 550 pages
...sum, there was not really anything benign, in arms race terms, about the President's inquiry: "But what if free people could live secure in the knowledge...their security did not rest upon the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack; that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles... | |
 | Douglas P. Lackey - 1984 - 300 pages
...is a sad commentary on the human condition. Wouldn't it be better to save lives than to avenge them? What if free people could live secure in the knowledge...their security did not rest upon the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack; that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1984 - 420 pages
...technology that spawned our great industrial base and that have given us the quality of life we enjoy today. What if free people could live secure in the knowledge...their security did not rest upon the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1984 - 368 pages
...people could live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest upon the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could...strategic ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that of our allies? I know this is a formidable, technical task, one that may not be accomplished... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 1984 - 270 pages
...almost a year ago he stated the challenge thus : "What If free people could live secure in the knowledge that . . . we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that of our allies? Would it not be better to save lives than to avenge them?" This objective... | |
| |
What if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest upon the threat of instant US retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil... 
