16 Ere Time to shape and fashion drew

These ductile members one by one,
Into man's image ere they grew,
Thy great prospective work was done.

17 O God! how gracious, how divine,

How dear thy counsels to my foul !
Myriads to myriads cou'd I join,
They'd fail to number up the whole.

18 I might as well go tell the fand,

And count it over grain by grain :
No; in thy presence let me stand,
And waking with my God remain.

19 Wilt thou not, Lord, avenge the good ?

Shall not blafphemers be destroy'd ?
Depart from me, ye men of blood,
Hence murderers, and my fight avoid!

20 Loud are their hoftile voices heard

To take thy sacred name in vain : 21 Am I not griev'd ? Doth not each word

Wring my afflicted heart with pain?

[ocr errors]

Doth not my zealous foul return

Hatred for hatred to thy foes? 32 Yea, Lord ! I feel my bosom burn,

As tho' against my peace they rose.

23 Try me, dread Power! and search my heart;

Lay all its movements in thy view ;
Explore it to its inmost part,
Nor spare it, if 'tis found untrue.

24 If

24 If devious from thy paths I stray,

And wickedness be found with me,
Oh! lead me back the better way
To everlasting life and Thee.

No. LXI.

He deistical writers, who would fain THE

persuade us that the world was in pofsession of as pure a system of morality before the introduction of Christianity as fince, affect to make a great display of the virtues of many eminent heathens, particularly of the philosophers Socrates, Plato, and fome others.

When they set up these characters as examples of perfection, which human nature with the aids of revelation either has not attained to, or not exceeded, they put us upon an invidious talk, which no man would voluntarily engage in, and challenge us to discuss a question, which, if thoroughly agitated, cannot fail to strip the illustrious dead of more than half the honours which the voice of ages has agreed to give them.


It is therefore to be wished that they had held the argument to its general terms, and shewn us where that system of ethics is to be found, which they are prepared to bring into comparison with the moral doctrines of Christ. This I take to be the fair ground whereon the controversy fhould have been decided, and here it would infallibly have been brought to iffue ; but they knew their weapons better than to trust them in so close a conflict.

The maxims of some heathen philosophers, and the moral writings of Plato, Cicero, and Seneca, contain many noble truths, worthy to be held in veneration by pofterity; and if the deist can from these produce a system of morality as pure and perfect as that which claims its origin from divine revelation, he' will prove that God gave to man a faculty of distinguishing between right and wrong with such correctness, that his own immediate revelation added no lights to those, which the powers of reason had already discovered. Let us grant therefore for a moment, that Christ's religion revealed to the world no new truths in morality, nor removed any old errors, and what triumph accrues to the deist by


the admiffion? The most he gains is to bring reason to a level with revelation, as to its moral-doctrines; in so doing he dignifies man's nature, and shews how excellent a faculty God gave his creatures in their original formation, to guide their judgments and controul their actions ; but will this diminish the importance of revealed religion ? Certainly not, unless he can prove one or both of the following positions ; viz.

First, That the moral tenets of Christianity either fall short of, or rụn counter to, the moral tenets of natural religion; or,

Secondly, That Christ's mission was nugatory and superfluous, because the world was already in poffeffion of as good a system of morality as he imparted to mankind. ;

As to the first, I believe it has never been attempted by any heathen or deistical advocate to convict the Gospel system of false morality, or to alledge that it is short and defective in any one particular duty, when compared with that system which the world was pofleft of without its aid. No man, I believe, has controverted its truths, though many have disputed its discoveries : No


man has been hardy enouglı to say of any of its doctrines - This we ought not 10 practife; though many have been vain enough to cry out--All this we knew before.—Let us leave this position therefore for the present, and pass to the next, viz. Whether Christ's miffion was nugatory and superfluous, because the world already knew as much morality as he taught them.

This will at once be answered, if the Gofpel assertion be established, that life and immortality were brought to light. We need not adduce any other of the mysteries of revelation; we may safely rest the question here, and say with the apostle to the Gentile world-Behold! I jew you a myftery : We Mall not all seep, but we Mall all be changed ; in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump (for the trumpet jhall found) and the dead Mall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. Mark to how short an issue the argument is now brought ! Either the apostle is not warranted in calling this a mystery, or the deift is not warranted in calling Christ's mission nugatory and fuperfluous.


« VorigeDoorgaan »