ATTACHMENTS CHRONOLOGY OF KEY MEETINGS/DISCUSSIONS INVOLVING July 30, 1985 September 9, 1985 October 10, 1985 October 11, 1985 October 22, 1985 November 26, 1985 NRC/PSNH meeting discussion of SSPSA submittal NRC/PSNH staff and counsel conference call - Discussion that "once technical analysis is done NRC staff notes NRC/PSNH staff conference call " (NRC staff) noted that what he explained to (PSNH in (NRC staff) said Seabrook should not be developing the case that Seabrook ..." (incomplete note) Seabrook coordination meeting with FEMA, NHY, NH and MA state civil defense staffs - Includes discussion of impact of the probabilisitic risk assessment on emergency planning issues FEMA staff notes that Brookhaven is reviewing the containment and time-to-failure aspects of the PRA Discussion of the size of the EPZ and legal analysis work Seabrook coordination meeting with FEMA, NHY, NH December 1985 February 1986 April 1986 July 9, 1986 July 21, 1986 July 25, 1986 July 29, 1986 "Seabrook Station Risk Management and Emergency Planning Study," Pickard, Lowe, and Garrick NUREG/CR-4540, "A Review of the Seabrook Station "Seabrook Station Emergency Planning Sensitivity Study," Pickard, Lowe, and Garrick NRC, PSNH, PL &G meeting to discuss PSA program 11 NRC staff meeting "(PSNH staff) says before they go for it give them a reading by October what are the merits of this piece of work does it provide some basis to go forth with exemption" NRC staff notes "What do we [Emphasis added] have to justify to change EPZ? ... need to consider technical and legal" (emphasis in original) PSNH requests that NRC expedite the technical "A future submittal, depending on the results of the technical review, may request a change to the emergency response plan process for Seabrook Station. We cannot, at this time, specify what action such a future request may seek, but it is important that we address as soon as possible what options are available to us relative to full power licensing. This is important in light of the apparent strategy of the State of Massachusetts to delay the process." (emphasis added) July 18 or 29, 1986 NRC staff meeting "(NHY) wants to know if this could serve as a technical argument. If not, he won't file. Point out which technical arguments are good vs. no" "Seabrook has thrown away containment failure" "Did they include any real data vs. generic - May CHRONOLOGY 3 August 5, 1986 August 6, 1986 August 6, 1986 August 11, 1986 August 13, 1986 August 14, 1986 August 27, 1986 NRC Staff and PSNH meeting "NRC is beginning an expedited review of the study to assess the technical adequacy of PSNH's analysis to support the study's conclusions." Brookhaven National Laboratories (BNL) compiles project description for Review of the Emergency Planning Sensitivity Study for Seabrook NRC Staff, BNL, and PSNH onsite walk through -- - - Internal NRC staff memorandum "It is important to decide what direction NRC is going to take on this issue before a detailed technical review can start. A decision chart set up in the form of three questions is attached for your consideration" Meeting at BNL with NRC staff and PSNH NRC staff notes "Do review in short period of time to get positive response or questions needed to get there" containment "Unique features of Seabrook Let's try to make it more unique show it's better than average" (emphasis added) - NRC staff and PSNH meeting "Review group to (NRC "Shrinking of planning zone vs. evacuation zone may be able to reduce evacuation zone but not planning zone" (emphasis in original) ... August 28, 1986 September 26, 1986 NRC staff memo outlining staff review plan for "Goals of review: 1. To provide a technical assessment of the 2. In the event it is concluded that the Study does ... PSNH: "We started this effort some time ago If ACRS Member: "Can you go ahead by just agreeing So we PSNH: "... the exercise in New Hampshire will come "We are trying to learn from everybody. We want to October 10, 1986 ACRS Member: "How far is the nearest point in ACRS Member: "If you had an emergency zone of 2 PSNH: "I think the answer to that question is ACRS full committee meeting ACRS: "The two reports that we have looked at have ACRS: "I would hope the (NRC) staff develops some ACRS: "But let's face it. They wouldn't be |