Critical and Historical EssaysLongmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1874 - 855 pagina's |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-5 van 93
Pagina 15
... Charles ven- ture to say that he was a better sove- reign than his son . He was not , in name and profession , a Papist ; we say Charles himself and his creature Laud , while they abjured the innocent badges of Popery , retained all its ...
... Charles ven- ture to say that he was a better sove- reign than his son . He was not , in name and profession , a Papist ; we say Charles himself and his creature Laud , while they abjured the innocent badges of Popery , retained all its ...
Pagina 16
... Charles the First broken the fundamental laws of England ? freedom . These are the parts of the to be tyrants . The ground on which Revolution which the politicians of they , in their famous resolution , de- whom we speak , love to ...
... Charles the First broken the fundamental laws of England ? freedom . These are the parts of the to be tyrants . The ground on which Revolution which the politicians of they , in their famous resolution , de- whom we speak , love to ...
Pagina 17
... Charles to summon parliaments . Why not pursue an end another parliament : another chance confessedly good by peaceable and was given to our fathers : were they to regular means ? We recur again to throw it away as they had thrown away ...
... Charles to summon parliaments . Why not pursue an end another parliament : another chance confessedly good by peaceable and was given to our fathers : were they to regular means ? We recur again to throw it away as they had thrown away ...
Pagina 18
... Charles are fond of dwelling . If , they say , he governed his people ill , he at least governed them after the example of his prede- cessors . If he violated their privileges , it was because those privileges had not been accurately ...
... Charles are fond of dwelling . If , they say , he governed his people ill , he at least governed them after the example of his prede- cessors . If he violated their privileges , it was because those privileges had not been accurately ...
Pagina 20
... Charles could have been . The minister only ought to be responsible for the acts of the Sovereign . If so , why not impeach Jefferies and retain James ? The person of a King is sacred . Was the person of James considered sacred at the ...
... Charles could have been . The minister only ought to be responsible for the acts of the Sovereign . If so , why not impeach Jefferies and retain James ? The person of a King is sacred . Was the person of James considered sacred at the ...
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Critical and Historical Essays, Volume 3 Thomas Babington Macaulay Baron Macaulay Volledige weergave - 1901 |
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
absurd admiration appeared army authority Bacon believe Bengal Catholic century character Charles Church Church of England Church of Rome Clive conduct Council Court Crown defend doctrines Duke Dupleix eminent enemies England English Europe evil favour feeling France French Gladstone Hampden Hastings honour House of Bourbon House of Commons human hundred India James judge King letters liberty lived Long Parliament Lord Lord Byron manner means ment mind ministers moral Nabob nation nature never noble Novum Organum Nuncomar Omichund opinion Parliament party passed persecuted person Pitt poet poetry political Prince principles produced Protestant Protestantism Puritans racter reason reform reign religion religious respect Revolution Rome scarcely seems Southey sovereign Spain spirit statesman strong talents Temple thing thought thousand tion took Tories truth Walpole Whigs whole writer