Energy and water development appropriations for 1987: hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, Partie 8U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 |
À l'intérieur du livre
Résultats 1-5 sur 100
Page 131
... cost for electrical energy than their urban counter- part due to the cost encountered in providing electrical service to sparsely populated areas versus high density areas . T AEC is of the opinion that the proposed $ 11.9 million for ...
... cost for electrical energy than their urban counter- part due to the cost encountered in providing electrical service to sparsely populated areas versus high density areas . T AEC is of the opinion that the proposed $ 11.9 million for ...
Page 139
... cost per ton of material moved . Continued channel maintenance and replacement of Oliver Lock will allow our company and others to provide cost efficient , reliable transportation of commodities through the Port of Mobile . We actively ...
... cost per ton of material moved . Continued channel maintenance and replacement of Oliver Lock will allow our company and others to provide cost efficient , reliable transportation of commodities through the Port of Mobile . We actively ...
Page 161
... cost of fuel is the single largest operating expense Mississippi Power Company faces . Coal mined in the region served by the Warrior - Tombigbee Waterway provides us with a reliable , competitive source of fuel . deterioration of the ...
... cost of fuel is the single largest operating expense Mississippi Power Company faces . Coal mined in the region served by the Warrior - Tombigbee Waterway provides us with a reliable , competitive source of fuel . deterioration of the ...
Page 213
... cost , and 100 percent of the water supply cost . This means that the State of North Carolina and our partner local gov- ernments have expressed our intent to pay over 69 percent of the total estimated cost of the project , leaving only ...
... cost , and 100 percent of the water supply cost . This means that the State of North Carolina and our partner local gov- ernments have expressed our intent to pay over 69 percent of the total estimated cost of the project , leaving only ...
Page 216
... cost of the project and are working together on cooperative plans for the distribution and treatment of the water . - The State of North Carolina has expressed its intent to pay the non - federal cost share for flood control and ...
... cost of the project and are working together on cooperative plans for the distribution and treatment of the water . - The State of North Carolina has expressed its intent to pay the non - federal cost share for flood control and ...
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
additional Alabama River Animas-La Plata Project appreciate Appropriations for Energy April 14 Arkansas River authorized benefits biofuel biomass budget request channel City coal Colorado River Commerce Committee completed Congress Congressman construction continue Coosa Coosa River Corps of Engineers cost sharing County Creek Director drainage dredging economic Energy and Water facilities Federal fiscal year 1987 flood control fuel funding Gulf Hawaii Honorable Tom Bevill House of Representatives important improvements included Indian industry investment Jersey La Plata County land Levee Lock and Dam Louisiana million tons Navigation Project Ohio River Oklahoma operation and maintenance percent planning Port of Mobile President President's budget proposed Randleman Lake recommended Red River Valley region Representatives Washington River Basin River System statement Subcommittee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy testimony Thank Tom Bevill transportation Tributaries U.S. Army Warrior-Tombigbee Waterway Water Development House water resources water supply