66

neatly built of grass and reeds, the streets are regular, and the Government offices are built of sunburnt bricks; there is a dockyard here for building nuggars;" vegetables of all sorts are plentiful, and the country opposite produces large crops of dhurra. With the exception of the river margin in the neighborhood of Lado and Gondokoro, where the Nile is obstructed by an abundant growth of rank vegetation, the country is generally healthy.

The one thing that is lacking to ensure the future prosperity of the province is a means of communication with the outer world. With the ability to obtain a supply of ammunition, and various other very needful articles not produced there, the Governor could hold his own for any length of time. Cut off from Egypt by the disturbed country ravaged by the late Mahdi and his successors, severed from the Indian Ocean by the unfriendliness of the Uganda potentate and a stretch of absolutely unknown country to the eastward, there yet re

It

mains one entrance by which to approach this isolated spot. It is Mr. Stanley's intention to reach it by way of the Kongo, from which magnificent waterway it is separated by a comparatively small tract of unknown land. On the Albert Nyanza Emin has a steamer, taken up by Gordon, with which he can easily meet an expedition from the Kongo at the south end of the lake. is to the Kongo, then, and to the Kongo Free State that we must look to carry on the traditions of Gordon and of Emin, and to insure the future welfare and progress of these lost territories of Egypt. Egypt. As an advanced outpost of the Kongo Free State the Equatorial Provinces will, it may be hoped, continue to present a barrier to the ravages of the slave-trade, and to form a vantage point, right in the very heart of its huntinggrounds, from which that horrible traffic can be attacked and at last put an end to. to. Then, indeed, will the work of Gordon and of Emin not have been in vain.-Gentleman's Magazine.

THE present paper is less a rehabilitation than a resuscitation. Its subject died doubly years ago, died in frame and fame, gave up the ghost of his glory before his last sigh. True, that as late as the autumn of 1866, the date of his death in the dictionaries, a being walked and talked, and fed and slept, whom stubborn admirers yet pointed out to you as Léon Gozlan. True, his friends yet held him in high esteem, and even his publishers had not yet abandoned him; but as a living literary force and figure he was no more, and he has been continuing to die ever since the real material death recorded by the biographical dictionaries. "Il y a des morts qu'il faut qu'on tue," could never have been said of Gozlan; rather the inverse," Il y a des vivants qu'il faut faire vivre," for his odd celebrity went really too soon before him. To the last he was surrounded by professional sympathies and private friendships, but the outer public had forgotten him.

Jules Claretie, who knew him well, describes him at sixty: a massive figure, square-shouldered; brown as burnt umber, not bronzed nor olive-skinned; his crisp hair yet black; his gait energetic. There seemed a wonderful intensity of life in the little robust frame. Only his eyes were weary and melancholy. It was said of him that he spent his last months in an overwhelming dread of death. Claretie opines that it was rather with him a lassitude of life, more than disappointment, disgust. His last years were precisely those in which the mercantile gangrene was gaining art and literature, the press, the stage. The Romantique dream of Art for art's sake" had disappeared; the cloud had vanished, the counter had come. The measure of success was, What did it fetch"? The elastic firm Dumas Senior and Company was boasting of an income of sixteen thousand pounds a year; the younger Dumas was making his modern romances turn only on

66

golden hinges, describing in detail the lorette's treasures and the lover's expenditure. Emile de Girardin had been surpassed by de Villemessant, the newspapers had become a manufacture of advertisements; Queen Réclame and King Chantage reigned supreme from end to end of the Rue du Croissant. And Gozlan came of a generation which treated manuscript paper as vellum, not as check books; drew its characters with proud care, hung long over the page, and if they were sometimes hardly content with the wage, were scarcely ever content with the work. He came from Marseilles, one of the battalion of the South that invaded Paris in very Falstaffian uniforms somewhere about 1830. But he had lived before this, as many of his comrades had not. He was always said to have journeyed round the world, but in truth he had been round Senegal, and perhaps ventured as far as the Cape, or even Madagascar. Before that he had been usher in a Marseilles school, then sailor, then a species of freebooter; he had had bloody battles with the Senegalians, which he subsequently narrated in the Musée des Familles. This was an exceptional experience for a man who aspired to conquer the Boulevards. But he had besides an education of some depth-and that is useful even on the Boulevards-which he had acquired unaided in night-watches at sea, by lone camp-fires, in settlers' shanties on land. Better than all this, there was the Phocian fire in the brain and veins, the happy dash of the Cannebière.

Before writing he began by selling books, like Champfleury, like Hégésippe Moreau, and Emile Zola But he merely passed through the booksellers' shops, as it were, and before thirty was one of the Figaro-the first and most famous Figaro-that of 1829. He came in with Alphonse Karr and de Vaulabelle; he found there Blanqui describing the Chambers, Jal writing on art, Stephen de la Madeleine on music, and Jules Janin, Roqueplan, Rolle, Michel Masson were busy giving the journal that free, fanciful tone, brilliant independence of idea, on which it has lived and traded in its worst, most recent days. There he soon made his way, hewed his niche with sharp truths and sharper paradoxes; he boarded literature

as it were like a buccaneer, and indeed with his swarthy skin, his fierce mustache, and glittering eye he was for many years known on the boulevards as "the Pirate." Journalism sufficed him not. He wrote stories, romances, proverbes, prose and verse; he contributed physiologies-a fashionable form Balzac had originated-to the chief reviews ; he gave the stage every possible form of piece from vaudevilles with couplets to melodramas with prologues. He had that rarest, strongest kind of fancy, a logical fancy, a faculty that is of the earth with the flowers, not in the sky with the clouds. It was the fancy of the South, not that of the North. No French writer has pictured more vividly the inner life of seamen, the sombre dramas of shipboard. To this day, despite its demoded raging Romanticism, the "Histoire de Cent Trente Femmes' remains a model of moving narrative, so brisk as to be almost breathless. It is the story of the mutiny on board an English ship carrying convicts to Botany Bay. It is a flaming picture of almost Neroic brutality; something like the overflowing of a vat of blood and brandy. There is a grinding of teeth, a clenching of fists from beginning to end, a marvel of ferocious hideousness. of ferocious hideousness. The Byronic corsair, the pirates of Walter Scott and Cooper, are false and feeble fribbles beside the ugly splendor of Gozlan's heroes. Eugène Sue himself never attempted anything half as crude and cruel in the famous orgy on board the Salamandre. The Salamandre crew had merely received their wages; the Niagara men have seized the ship, and more than the ship. The superb rebel Ascott stands "his bull's front uncovered, a woman formidably beautiful pressed against his heart,"-launching a far more practical defiance at society than any of the Byronic denunciations.

"Women condemned by England, exiled by England, to go, crawl and die in the deserts of New Holland, Botany Bay, at Hobart Town, in Norfolk and Sydney; women whom adulterous England, impious and thieving England, corrupt and bloody England, homicidal, infanticidal, poisonous, whom thus England punishes for homicide, infanticide, theft, adultery, corruption;-women, you are free, we deliver you, the mutinied crew of the Niagara. His Majesty's magnificent ship Niagara is yours, all she holds is yours, men and things."

Then there is an explosion of hurrahs, curses and kisses; the officers are massacred, it is proposed to eat the purser; casks are staved in, store-rooms are burst open, the men and women eat and drink madly, cream with rum, jellies after ham, salt cod with plum-cake; they are surfeited without hunger, drunk without thirst, just simply for the bestial delight of devouring. And after the orgy comes the carnage: heads are split open, beards torn out by the roots; the crew is divided into two parties, biting and mangling each other in their vitriol madness. It is in truth one of the most powerful scenes of human butchery in modern romance, Homeric in breadth, realistic in detail; the isolated incidents are noticed with minute care, and the throwing of the vanquished by struggling knots into the sea is Dantesque in its broad horror.

And yet this is one of the least known of Gozlan's books. For many a modern romance-reader he is that irritating abortion of literature, that aloe with a blight, the single-book author. "Aristide Froissart' is enough for one man's reputation. It is a book unique in romantic literature. Its origin is said to be the proposition of a newspaper editor who in 1848 asked Léon Gozlan for a novel which should make tabula rasa of everything, which should be the requiem of property, society, family. Gozlan was not a more ferocious tabula rasa-ist than his fellows; indeed if any political principles can be associated with his name, they were rather retrograde than advanced. But it was an age when anarchy was in the air; anybody who chose could breathe or exhale it. "Aristide Froissart" is a book of uproarious raillery, keener than Joseph Prudhomme, livelier than Jérôme Paturot, more ironic even than Balzac's immortal bagman, the illustrious Gaudissart. It is the best example of that reasonable fun which is the most remarkable quality of Gozlan's genius. Aristide Froissart, born in Paris, is twenty-three, florid, tall and without any other distinctive sign. But he has a father who is a good deal more distinctive as an appanage than distinguished. Moreover he possesses three friends. The first is known as the Last Guitar, for the reason that he has undertaken a Quixotic crusade in favor

of that neglected instrument. The second, Beaugency-Beaugency, is an unreformed but used-up rake who has calculated that he has yet five years of life and four thousand pounds remaining, and intends that the last franc shall go with the last day. Lacervoise, the third friend, is "a sculptor who disdains to sculpt.' Their adventures are farces of the most furious type. One of the quietest, most commonplace, is making a lion drunk with champagne in the menagerie of a village fair. Aristide, imprisoned for debt at Sainte-Pélagie, reassures his father as to his future.

"

"Non

Here is a manuscript," he says, "worth thirty thousand francs.' sense!" is the natural answer of the hoary disbeliever in literature. But the book is "Memoirs by Jean Froissart, my Father. And the first chapter opens : "The first family my father ruined was- and the thirty thousand francs are paid. The paymaster subsequently reflects: "If I make a merchant of Aristide, he will never go to the office; if I make a soldier of him, he'll desert. As he is good for nothing, let us marry him.' And the marriage is one of the brightest episodes in the book. His love-gift to his betrothed is Thirty-six manners of making punch, by Aristide Froissart. The presiding mayor is a bootmaker, and while signing the register abuses the tradesman because of the quality of his leather. At the church Aristide ventriloquizes, and a baby being baptized, counsels its mother: Maman, never you marry." The sacramental "I will " comes from a coffin awaiting interment. No cruel jest is spared throughout the romance. It is a work, as it were, born out of the brain of a sick Yorick, whose infinite jest has become infinitely bitter and strikes at everything, creeds and institutions, opinions and hobbies. The nobility, the bourgeoisie, love, marriage, home-life-all men's gods or idols, save perhaps the idea of fatherland-are riddled and ridiculed with a cruel irony which is crueller perhaps for being comic.

The scorn was in some instances, we may believe, something more than a literary expression. In the

Goutte de Lait," a miniature comedy yet unpublished, he attacked the old noblesse, even the principle of any

noblesse, with something like vehemence; and in another of his innumerable little pieces, Notre Fille est Princesse," he has a much-applauded distinction: "We trading people never have any ancestors; all we have is grandfathers."

It is true that one of the chapters of "Aristide Froissart ends with the sublime aspiration : Ah, when shall I be able to eat a bourgeois !" But there is affectation in the cry; it is a mere Murgerism before letters. The author was himself a very bourgeois in the best sense of the term, if it have a best sense, which is never used save in a bad one. One of his latter-day friends describes his first visit, paid in trembling fear of some rude romantic figure like Lacervoise's father, and resulting in an interview with a simple citizen writing out titles for jam-pots in a round hand worthy Henri Monnier's writing-master himself. And he talked of Aristide Froissart, a nightmare for many a good bourgeois soul, with all a bourgeois' simple bonhomie.

66

"You mustn't think," he said, "that I found all those pleasantries at once. Every one of them cost me half-a-dozen headaches.' The author's genesis of his works is seldom faithful,-take for example, Edgar Poe's origin of the 'Raven;" but in this case the author was probably sincere. The book has certainly not the air of having been written by a good father of a family working at his hearthstone. But one of his axioms was, Nothing is more immoral than ennui ;" and his bookful of paradoxes was a protestation against the boredom bearing down contemporary literature and society.

He was not only a paradoxist, he was a stickler for truth, "l'apre vérité," as Danton said. No more heroesmen!" he cried long before Jules Vallés. And beside the sentimentalism of Karr, the ladylike prettiness of Sandeau, the clever extravagance of Méry -beside these and others of his famous contemporaries his novels have really a ring of realism that is almost a discordance in the literary chorus of his time. The "Notaire de Chantilly" is at least as severely exact a study of provincial life as any of Claude Vignon's, and the "Médecin du Pecq," that poignant

drama in a suburban boarding-house, is as true as all the "Comédie Humaine,' and, to be true as itself, far more interesting than much of it. Indeed in his day, Gozlan was known as the lesser Balzac he was the great man's most intimate friend; but his friendship did not prevent a spirit of rivalry which to us, seeing Balzac's immortality, may seem ridiculous, but was almost legitimate, at the time when the Titan was struggling against public indifference and private debts. In the two works familiar as gospels to all students of modern French romance, "Balzac en Pantoufles," and Balzac chez lui," Gozlan has expressed his friendship and admiration in a somewhat irreverent, almost a disrespectful fashion. The ludicrous story of the Jardies-the garden walls perpetually sliding down the slopes, the owner's visions of grapegrowing, of Oriental upholstery, etc.is told in a fashion that certainly tends to make the Titan dwindle in the reader's sight. Gozlan had no doubt a real affection for Balzac ; but if he could forgive him his genius he would not excuse the egotism of genius, which certainly led Balzac to use his friends and acquaintances in the interests of his own glory. Gozlan renders him constant and serious services-Balzac amply acknowledges the fact in the preface to the Ressources de Guinola"-and found, or thought he found, that as his "rival" grew great, he became ingrate as well. True, he toasts the great memory in a very loving cup, but there is a suspicion of vinegar at the bottom of the bowl.

He

Gozlan's reputation as a conversationalist of esprit was at least as noisy, if not as solid, as his literary renown. was a man of sallies and impromptus. When Paris was raving about the poetmurderer Lacenaire, Gozlan said: A little more and they'll put up his statue : I'd rather reduce his stature.' He began a speech with, "Lord Byron, whom the English in their culpable ignorance of the French language insist on calling Lord Baïronn." And he had the gift of poetic expression. He wrote: Children are as fruit and flowers in one.' Some of his fantastic stories in the Nuits du Père la Chaise'' and the "Méandres" are veritable poems in

prose. The Little Machiavels" is as living a study to-day as it was thirty years ago a series of bitter portraits of characters described popularly as "too too clever by half.” And there is a certain bitterness in Gozlan's best creation-the bitterness, if it can be explained at all, of a master-mind that missed its masterpiece, of the spirit perpetually within a hairbreadth of achieving an immortal work. For, privately, Gozlan was a happy man, sober and methodical, a café-hater, and a lover of books. He was often at the Théâtre Français on

the nights when Got played, and at Déjazet when the great little Virginie, who had so many Pauls, was on the programme. These and his beloved ocean, which he watched half the year long from his villa windows at Yport, were the chief interests of his life. Or perhaps the very first was as it is in many lives-a dream. Paris a Seaport.' He has sketched the scheme as a species of fairy tale of science, but he believed in it seriously as an imminent reality.Temple Bar.