sented to the removal of the objectionable ladies, it would have been impossible for Sir Robert to have insisted, that the ladies imposed upon her should have been received by her Majesty with that grace and favour which had been shown to those who had been dismissed against her will." Now this, we are bold to say, is a dilemma from which there is no escape. In either alternative, the personal character-the simply human-in the Sovereign, would have been the sole point of reliance. But it does not therefore follow, as Lord John supposed, that Sir Robert Peel's better policy would have been to withdraw at once the repugnant condition; for the individual to be depended upon might have stood firm in the one case as in the other, and, indeed, the condition was a test of the degree of confidence to be expected! It is not a question between man and woman, but between sovereign and subject. The whig ministry may have treated, as Lord John seems to recommend his successor, the Queen as a child, but a conservative ministry must assume her competence for her office. That, in his lordship's estimation, her Majesty is of a high and generous spirit, and would have felt the generosity which dictated concession, is a favourable accident. But what then! would the nobleman's sister and the marquess's wife have waited to be turned out? Would they have so much been lacking in generosity, as to put their royal mistress to that unpleasant necessity? No generosity has been wanting on the part of her Majesty, that is clear;but has it not been wanting in other quarters ? Had Sir Robert Peel conceded, would those ladies have resigned? To return again to the humanities of the argument. We are by Lord John Russell reminded--and it behoves the country and the leaders of all parties in it, to recollect constantly, that the Queen is "a Sovereign of no mature age, who was very young when she came to the throne, and of a sex which calls for the peculiar exercise of generosity; but that neither the sex of her Majesty prevents her from being wanting in courage, nor the age of her Majesty prevents her from having a just discrimination and a sound understanding." It is so. Our's is a limited monarchy; and notwithstanding the irresponsibility of the Sovereign, we are yet subject to the influences that flow from the personal character and conduct of the Monarch. The country is now thrown upon that. Her Majesty has for the first time assumed authority. It is a serious crisis both for the Crown and the country. Not a head-not a heart-but should think-but should feel-concerning this great, this important day of transition "Big with the fate of Britain and the Queen." The dawn is overcast, the morning lours-the first gleams of which were so bright and welcome. Nor is the sudden dimness of any politician's raising, nor by the spells of any such can it be banished from the prospect. Man, we repeat, is working. Working? But what is all human working, but being worked? It is He only who works, who has worked hitherto, and who has said that, in the latter days, "the Sun shall be darkened, and the Moon shall not give her light, and the Stars shall fall from Heaven, and the Powers of the Heaven shall be shaken." Already, according to the testimony of the Oxford Divines, the Spirit of God has departed from the Church; at any rate, that neither priest nor people have any certainty of his presence; that nothing but an historical chain of a disputable succession remains as evidence of its authority. Even while we write, news is brought that the barricades are again in the streets of Paris; and that in every quarter of England the Chartists are rising. Both here and in France blood has flowed. The cause of insurrection has been baptised-its votary is red-a cause, according to the opposing views of adverse parties, either sacred or accursed, but none indifferent! "Watch ye, therefore ! for ye know not when the Master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cock-crowing, or in the morning: lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping. And what I say unto you, I say unto all, Watch!" We write as philosophers also, therefore with imperturbable impartiality; esteeming all parties as moral forces, the operation of which it is the point of wisdom to ascertain. Nor let it be supposed, that the democratic power is, in these days, a mere brute power; and composed of a union of ignorant men. We have taken some pains to ascertain the fact, and can declare, on our conscience, that it is guided by intelligence, and is not to be resisted by physical means. By the God of heaven! the Chartist is a man; and the words he uses are facts—or more—that is, truths! That man, indeed, is wronged, who is in a condition to be compelled to call another man, master! "Call no man master!"-that is the Christian principle. But it is a principle for a pure estate of the Church -and for the world, when it shall, if so destined, have become a Church. But we doubt this destiny-we doubt the possibility of perfect Christism on the earth. The principles point to another state; and are given to man as evidences of it. Always over-informed and inspired with such ideas, he is discontented with his temporal condition, however good; if evil, he has still greater reason for his discontent; and the law of his constitution is, that the better his temporal estate shall become, the more evil it shall appear; for the perception of a greater good in any way leads to future anticipations that make the present still meaner in contrast; and thus it is that the appetite for human welfare grows by what it feeds on. We have just received evidence that there is strong genius at work also among the elements of disaffection. An unpublished book in blank verse, with lyrical interpositions, without author's name or envelope has only this morning been left at our domicile. Incorrectly and meanly printed, yet the manner of its transmission and other signs about it, made us look into it at once. We plainly saw that our admiration of Milton had not a little to do with the transmission to us of the volume. Perhaps, because of his head on our cover, it might have been conceived that we held republican sentiments; which is an error. The grounds for our belief consist in the title and dedication of the book which are as follow. N. S. VOL. I. 4 Y "Ernest, or Political Regeneration, in Twelve Books, London; Printed for the Author, by R. Gadsden, Upper St. Martin's Lane, M.DCCC.xxxix. Damit das gute wirke wachse, fromme, Damit der tag des edlen endlich homme. To the Memory of Milton, the Poet, the Divine, and the Republican, this work, written in the light of his Glorious Countenance is dedicated." Rough as sometimes is the versification of this poem, it is always energetic, genial and truthful; erring only in the supposition that the regeneration sought is compatible with temporary conditions. We mention it, to point the attention of ministers and legislators to the fact that the Chartist demonstrations are not unconnected with the noblest feelings and the brightest talents. Let these be reverenced, whatever else is done. It may also be instructive to know the searching views that are taken. Such men as the writers of this poem are no grovelling politicians, we quote the following in the way of caution: "Now then away With saws of ancient use; bury the dead, And let the quick go forth: give heed no more Make level every fence of privilege, But hold! lest thou shouldst say, so high a sound The common throng that do inhabit it: If that the commons have not their free-will, To whirl without all stay; trust me, 'twas s0 Would'st have the people take their stedfast stand, But they, the dolts, wise but in words alone, And shot their chance away; the commons came It touches nought beside: for so to spoil Who first made all of nothing,-such a spoil To be his housemate, and familiar, Homely as the goodwife that sweeps his hearth; Indeed, not to trim here and there a bough, But strike at the root of all; what seems to the eye Of doubt most hard, is easiest to the hand Of stubborn strong determination, For safety dwells not in the shallow sands, Such sentiments let the politician ponder, that he may act advisedly. The superior orders have hitherto maintained themselves by superior intelligence. But this is no longer possible. All classes of men are rising to the same level. The religious sentiments of the work before us, and of the late demonstrations, are deserving of the profoundest consideration. Literature, too, is a general accomplishment. The democratic cause is no longer divorced from either piety or knowledge. We must look to this. Nor should we forget that the influence exerted by literature must, in all cases, be in favour of morals against manners. We mean, that where the conventional has substituted the morality of which it was originally the exponent, there the Man of Letters, the Poet, the Dramatist, the Romancist, the Critic, is called upon to prophesy against the stagnant surface, so that society may be put into healthful motion again. Any system which would reduce the whole moral law to something merely conventional, must be evil. It is given to literature to assert the claims of soul over body; of spirit over matter. Wo! to its professors, if they neglect their duty. 702 SONNETS BY H. L. MANSEL, ESQ. I. We live twin lives together; that without As grateful for their being, are sincere To work our hests. Cast then thine eyes about, And choose thy station. Prince or potentate, II. Seek'st thou Arcadian joys? Thy flocks and herds |