...religious metaphor in Genesis, that man and wife are one flesh: ". . . the marital couple," he said, "is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own . . . ."38 Equal, but separate, each person had a constitutional right to procreative privacy. In dissent...

...be prohibited, a ban on distribution to unmarried persons would be equally impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. // the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be...

...be prohibited, a ban on distribution to unmarried persona would be equally impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. // the right of privacy mean» anything, it it the right of the individual, married or tingle, to be...

...405 US 438, another contraceptive case, we expanded the concept of Oriswold by saying : "It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...the marital couple is not an independent entity with & mind and heart of its own, but an association of two individuals each with a separate intellectual...

...thrown around personal intimacy and bodily integrity was not meant to protect only married persons : "If the right of privacy means anything it is the right of the iwiiridital, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion * « *." Ei»enstadt...

...be prohibited, a ban on distribution to unmarried persons would be equally impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, hut an association of two individuals euch with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. If the...

...privacy inhered in a particular relationship. Speaking for the Court, Justice Brennan wrote: "It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the married couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, but an association of...

...intrusion, the state has an interest. Surely it was not necessary for the Court to say, in that case, that "if the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual ... to be free from unwarranted government instrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person...

...clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The heart of the opinion is the following passage:53 It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the married couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, but an association of...

...liberty of the unmarried. For the Court, Justice William Brennan, Jr., wrote, italicizing the key word, "If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of an individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so...