March to Armageddon: The United States and the Nuclear Arms Race, 1939 to the Present
Oxford University Press, 1987 - 300 pages
There have been scientific studies of the nuclear arms race, and there have been political exposes -- yet no book until now has given the general reader a complete and accessible history of the events, forces and factors that have brought the world to the brink of a nuclear holocaust. In this revealing account, Ronald Powaski examines two basic questions: What keeps the nuclear arms race going and why is it so difficult to end?
Starting with the opening days of World War II, when Roosevelt gave the go-ahead for the secret development of the atom bomb, the famous Manhattan Project, Powaski traces the unfolding arms race up to the current day. He takes us through Truman's decision to use the bomb against Japan in 1945, the Cold War era and the missile crisis of Kennedy's administration, to the detente years of the seventies and the defense and arms control policies of Ronald Reagan, including "Star Wars" and START (the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks).
As Powaski explains, both the United States and the Soviet Union now have a combined total of almost 50,000 nuclear weapons. Nuclear arms treaties and agreements are threatening to collapse, he argues, while the proliferation of nuclear materials and weapons throughout the world has given many countries the capability to produce nuclear weapons. Emphasizing the role of the United States, Powaski shows how one president after another has promised to do his utmost to end the nuclear weapons competition, yet each one has actually increased the quantity or quality of these weapons in the American arsenal. March to Armageddon reveals this startling discrepancy between presidential words and actions.
Résultats 1-3 sur 44
It was unworkable, they argued, because the Soviets would soon have the
capability to overwhelm any American ABM site with scores of warheads ejected
by MIRVed vehicles. Distinguished scientists, including Hans Bethe, Herbert York
He argued that American willingness to halt MIRV deployments might be the only
way to get the Soviets to halt their ongoing deployments of ICBMs and SLBMs.
More important, he felt that it was not in the long-term interests of either side to ...
All of these organizations were united by a common distrust for the Soviet Union
in general and arms control in particular.62 More specifically, conservative critics
of the treaty argued that it was not equitable. The treaty permitted the Soviets to ...
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
March to Armageddon: the United States and the nuclear arms race, 1939 to the presentAvis d'utilisateur - Not Available - Book Verdict
Rarely will one find such a felicitous combination of books on nuclear weapons strategy and the arms race. Charlton had extensive interview experience with the BBC and in this oral history brings ... Consulter l'avis complet
Roosevelt and the Manhattan Project 19391945
Truman Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945
Truman and International Control of the Atom 19451947
14 autres sections non affichées