Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism

Voorkant
Duke University Press, 1990 - 181 pagina's
1 Recenseren
The concept sensus communis—a term that means a great deal more than its English translation “common sense”—has served as a key principle in the theory of knowledge from the ancient Greeks through the Enlightenment philosophers. John D. Schaeffer shows how the seventeenth-century Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico synthesized Greek and Roman ideas of what sensus communis and what this synthesis implies for current discussions of rhetoric and hermeneutics. Arguments for ethical relativism emerge from divisions between sensus communis as an ethical judgment (a concept that Richard Rorty, Richard Bernstein, and others have tried to rescue) and as a linguistic consensus, a division against which Vico argued and which his own concept of sensus communis attempted to reconcile.
In extended commentaries on Gadamer, the Gadamer/Habermas debate, and Derrida, Schaeffer shows that Vico offers the possibility of analyzing social phenomena and constellations of power from within the humanist rhetorical tradition. Vico’s achievements have powerful implications for relating ethics and hermeneutics to the world of concrete social practice, particularly in an age in which the electronic media have replaced print as the primary means of communication and in which a “secondary orality” (a cast of mind similar to that of nonliterate peoples) is appearing within our literate civilization.
  

Wat mensen zeggen - Een recensie schrijven

We hebben geen recensies gevonden op de gebruikelijke plaatsen.

Verwante boeken

Inhoudsopgave

Orality and Writing in the History of Rhetoric
6
Oral Arenas in Vicos Naples
35
Orality and Sensus Communis
55
Sensus Communis in the New Science
80
Sensus Communis in Vico and Gadamer
100
Vico and Derrida on Language
127
Ethics Rhetoric and Sensus Communis
150
Copyright

Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen

Verwijzingen naar dit boek

Alle resultaten in Google Boeken »

Verwijzingen uit webpagina's toevoegen

JSTOR: Troping and Arguing
TROPING AND ARGUING* The essays in The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric skillfully engage three of the most important topics in ...
links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=0010-7484(199122)32%3A2%3C285%3ATAA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N

PII: 0191-6599(95)90533-2
The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric , Paul Hernadi, ed.,. (London: Duke University Press, 1989). 228 + xiii pages, Ł10.35 pb ...
linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/ pii/ 0191659995905332

Humanist Archives Vol. 3 : 3.885 Poetics Today (141)
The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric Editor: Paul Hernadi "The volume ... strongly suggests that the principles and ...
lists.village.virginia.edu/ lists_archive/ Humanist/ v03/ 0879.html

HERMENEUTICS
The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric. Durham: Duke UP, 1989. Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt, ed. The Hermeneutics Reader. ...
www.phillwebb.net/ Topics/ Communication/ Interpretation/ InterpretationTheory.htm

An other ethics for Kenneth Burke | Communication Studies | Find ...
In P. Hernadi (Ed.), The rhetoric of interpretation and the interpretation of rhetoric (pp. 143-171). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Heath, rl (1986). ...
findarticles.com/ p/ articles/ mi_qa3669/ is_199804/ ai_n8793546/ pg_24

Bazaar India
... "The Challenge of Poetics to (Normal) Historical Practice," in The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric , ed. ...
content.cdlib.org/ xtf/ view?docId=ft4779n9tq& chunk.id=0& doc.view=print

Bibliografische gegevens